Pam, Thanks for that - easy when you know where to look! Regards, Linda. -----Original Message----- From: Pam Downes Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 12:51 PM To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LIN] KIRTON The answer to your problem is easily solved by reference to the wonderful Lincolnshire 1837+ Marriages Index. http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ One of *the* essential bookmarks for everyone on this list. Pam Proud to be a member of Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk/ On 20/03/2012 12:38, Ward Family Tree wrote: > Hello, > > I have been trying on and off sometime to find a birth or > pre-marriage census records for my husbands GG grandmother SARAH JANE > KIRTON b.1853 approx. in NAVENBY. She married WILLIAM SIMPSON in Q1 1877 > in Spilsby registration district and I have been able to track her from > then onwards but have not been able to find her prior to her marriage. I > have tried the Lincs to the Past website but unfortunately the Navenby > parish records are not yet online which assumes place of birth is correct. > > I will at some point in the future buy her marriage listing which > will hopefully give me her fathers name (and perhaps confirmation of her > age/year of birth) but in the meantime any help finding her prior to 1877 > would be really appreciated. > > Thanks and regards, > > Linda > In Bath, UK > > ------------------------------- ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

The answer to your problem is easily solved by reference to the wonderful Lincolnshire 1837+ Marriages Index. http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ One of *the* essential bookmarks for everyone on this list. Pam Proud to be a member of Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk/ On 20/03/2012 12:38, Ward Family Tree wrote: > Hello, > > I have been trying on and off sometime to find a birth or pre-marriage census records for my husbands GG grandmother SARAH JANE KIRTON b.1853 approx. in NAVENBY. She married WILLIAM SIMPSON in Q1 1877 in Spilsby registration district and I have been able to track her from then onwards but have not been able to find her prior to her marriage. I have tried the Lincs to the Past website but unfortunately the Navenby parish records are not yet online which assumes place of birth is correct. > > I will at some point in the future buy her marriage listing which will hopefully give me her fathers name (and perhaps confirmation of her age/year of birth) but in the meantime any help finding her prior to 1877 would be really appreciated. > > Thanks and regards, > > Linda > In Bath, UK > > -------------------------------

Hello, I have been trying on and off sometime to find a birth or pre-marriage census records for my husbands GG grandmother SARAH JANE KIRTON b.1853 approx. in NAVENBY. She married WILLIAM SIMPSON in Q1 1877 in Spilsby registration district and I have been able to track her from then onwards but have not been able to find her prior to her marriage. I have tried the Lincs to the Past website but unfortunately the Navenby parish records are not yet online which assumes place of birth is correct. I will at some point in the future buy her marriage listing which will hopefully give me her fathers name (and perhaps confirmation of her age/year of birth) but in the meantime any help finding her prior to 1877 would be really appreciated. Thanks and regards, Linda In Bath, UK

>From Glentworth Parish Register for 1733: Deborah Daughter of William & Elizabeth ROBSON – bapt: Jan’y: 9th N.B. This Child was born when her Mother was Forty Nine. David Nottingham

Can anyone assist with the marriage of: John HOUSOM and Prudence ? ? ? circa 1725 – 1742 John was bapt. at Glentworth in 1702 and is listed there having issue with Prudence from 1742 onwards. Prudence is possibly the Prudence SMITH bapt. at Caenby in 1707 (Prudence HOUSOM was buried at Glentworth on 1790 aged 83 years.) I have have checked the following: IGI – FamilySearch - No trace. L.F.H.S. Marriage Bonds CD – No trace. Lincstothepast: Caenby & Glentworth online PR’s – No trace. David Nottingham

Hi Pam: Wow - terrific. What a lot of work but very appreciated. Carol On 3/20/12, Pam Downes <pam@five-oaks.co.uk> wrote: > The answer to your problem is easily solved by reference to the > wonderful Lincolnshire 1837+ Marriages Index. > http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/

There are some cases amongst the ones that I have found for fathers being taken to court for not paying up, so yes, they were followed up. Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen- > bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Carol Lylyk > Sent: 20 March 2012 03:44 > To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [LIN] Bastardy Cases in the Newspaper > > Thanks Anne. It doesn't sound like much at todays rates but I guess it > could be > hard enough for these men to make the payments. I wonder if there was any > follow up to make sure that they paid. > > Carol Lylyk > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anne Cole" <duncalf@one-name.org> > To: <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 4:05 AM > Subject: Re: [LIN] Bastardy Cases in the Newspaper > > > > Hello Carol, > > > > I can't answer your question about wages, but as you say the awards were > > made according to ability to pay. The highest amount that could be paid > was > > 2s. 6d. In the workhouse minutes, 1s. 6d. is the amount most quoted as > that > > which someone should pay to support a relative on poor relief. Therefore > it > > must have been an amount affordable by most. > > > >>From 1844 the child had to be supported until it was 13 years of age. > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message

Very possible, Carol. You need to look at a paper local to Barnsley, for the reports from the local Petty Sessions courts. Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen- > bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Ray Forsberg > Sent: 20 March 2012 04:57 > To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [LIN] Bastardy Cases in the Newspaper > > Hi Anne, > > I wondered whether there was any way I could find this sort of report > in the Barnsley, Yorkshire, newspapers. I have a huge brick wall in > that my gg-grandfather was illegitimate - born in 1857 at the Barnsley > Union Workhouse "father unknown" on the birth certificate. He took > his mother's name. > > Cheers, > > Carol > > On 20 March 2012 14:44, Carol Lylyk <clylyk@telus.net> wrote: > > Thanks Anne.  It doesn't sound like much at todays rates but I guess it > could be > > hard enough for these men to make the payments.  I wonder if there was > any > > follow up to make sure that they paid. > > > > Carol Lylyk > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Anne Cole" <duncalf@one-name.org> > > To: <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 4:05 AM > > Subject: Re: [LIN] Bastardy Cases in the Newspaper > > > > > >> Hello Carol, > >> > >> I can't answer your question about wages, but as you say the awards > were > >> made according to ability to pay. The highest amount that could be paid > was > >> 2s. 6d. In the workhouse minutes, 1s. 6d. is the amount most quoted as > that > >> which someone should pay to support a relative on poor relief. > Therefore it > >> must have been an amount affordable by most. > >> > >>>From 1844 the child had to be supported until it was 13 years of age. > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message

In the depths of North Yorkshire, we had a mobile greengrocer right in to the 1970s, Diane. Janet ----- Original Message ----- From: "Diana Robinson" <drobins6@rochester.rr.com> To: <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 12:21 PM Subject: Re: [LIN] Bastardy Cases in the Newspaper > One thing to remember is that in those days many of the merchants, who > would > today have their own "brick and mortar" shops, used to go house to house > delivering. That, of course, could have given ample opportunity for > shenanigans (provided that the horse pulling the card was patient). > > I can remember that during WWII we had a greengrocer who came house to > house > delivering. Just as well since petrol was so strictly rationed it was > difficult to go shopping as people do today. > > Happy hunting! > > Diana Robinson (nee Gardner) > Now in Rochester, NY, USA > -----Original Message----- > From: Carol Lylyk [mailto:clylyk@telus.net] > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 12:03 PM > To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [LIN] Bastardy Cases in the Newspaper > > I love reading all of your postings Anne. I was wondering if the amounts > the > men were ordered to pay would be a hardship for them as I have no idea > what > wages would have been in those days. I see that the one man, a butcher, > was > ordered to pay more so I guess the amounts were set according to their > ability > to pay. Also how long would they have to pay? Now days I believe they > are > required to support the child until they are at least 18. > > Carol Lylyk > Canada > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anne Cole" <duncalf@one-name.org> > To: <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 6:11 AM > Subject: [LIN] Bastardy Cases in the Newspaper > > >> There was only one last week so I saved it for this week. >> >> LRSM = Lincoln, Rutland and Stamford Mercury >> > > > > > >

Hi Pat, Are you a member of the LFHS?  If so, how about asking for some these photos to be posted on the website or in the journal under the Mystery Photos facility. On 17 March 2012 15:40, Pat Cook <paver207@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > I have finally got round to dealing with some of my elderly maiden aunt's photograph albums. > > One of her best friends was Joyce Robinson, the girls were friends when they both lived in Osgodby, Lincs. Joyce was born in 1906 at Sheffield, her father was Arthur Philip Robinson b 1876 Bleasby Moor. I looked them up in 1911 census. Arthur was a farmer at Osgodby. His wife was Annie Mary .........   b Snarford, they had another daughter Constance b  1904 Sheffield. > > Would like to find a home for these lovely photographs, does anybody recognise this family?  They would certainly compliment somebodies family history. > Pat, Grimsby, Lincs -- Richard Brown Bromley, Kent U.K. Member of: - E. Surrey Family History Society          )   And in http://www.eastsurreyfhs.org.uk/           )   very Lincolnshire Family History Society       )  good http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk/          )  company.

Three Fountain brothers, born 1839, 1840 and 1841 in West Barkwith, joined the Royal Marines at Woolwich, Kent in 1860. The eldest, William, was invalided out in 1876, the middle one, George, was invalided out in 1866 and the youngest, Thomas, died in Deal Barracks in 1871 of haematuria (blood in the urine) but the cause of this was not given on his death certificate. I have copies of the attestation papers for William and Thomas. They show that William had a big drink problem and he was discharged as suffering from imbecility. There is nothing in the paperwork about injury or illness. I did not get George's paperwork but I know he married, became a policeman and, I believe, emigrated to Canandaigua, New York with his wife and adult son. So, I think he cannot have been a long term invalid. I am wondering how three young brothers could be either invalids or dead within such a short time. Does anybody know if there were conflicts they could have been injured in during the period between 1860 and 1876? I suppose William's mental problems could have come from a head injury. He received a naval pension according to the 1911 census, so his imbecility is not likely to be alcoholic. I would appreciate any thoughts, as I have tried to Google wars etc without success. With kind regards, Shay

Thanks Anne. It doesn't sound like much at todays rates but I guess it could be hard enough for these men to make the payments. I wonder if there was any follow up to make sure that they paid. Carol Lylyk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anne Cole" <duncalf@one-name.org> To: <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 4:05 AM Subject: Re: [LIN] Bastardy Cases in the Newspaper > Hello Carol, > > I can't answer your question about wages, but as you say the awards were > made according to ability to pay. The highest amount that could be paid was > 2s. 6d. In the workhouse minutes, 1s. 6d. is the amount most quoted as that > which someone should pay to support a relative on poor relief. Therefore it > must have been an amount affordable by most. > >>From 1844 the child had to be supported until it was 13 years of age.

Hello Carol, I just have 1930s. It was moved to the St Giles estate to the north of Lincoln, but still inside the city limits. There should be something about it in one of the Survey of Lincoln books. Probably Uphill Lincoln Part 2, but we don't have it on Genfair, the Survey of Lincoln website doesn't give a very full description, and I don't have one here to look at! Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen- > bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Carol J Markillie > Sent: 19 March 2012 20:25 > To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [LIN] St Peters At The Arches, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, England > > Hi Anne: > > Do you have an approximate year that it was moved to St. Giles? I'm > assuming that's not > Tydd St. Giles - am I wrong? > > Many thanks - > Carol at the end of the Olympic Peninsula Washington USA > where the whales, porpoise and orcas play - hopefully still play > > > On 3/17/12, Anne Cole <duncalf@one-name.org> wrote: > > St Peter at Arches church was dismantled and moved lock, stock and > barrel to > > be the parish church for the St Giles estate where it still remains. > Quite > > true. > > > > Anne > > > > Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message

Thanks Lou -----Original Message----- From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Louis Mills Sent: 19 March 2012 19:13 To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LIN] John WIng of Castle Bytham Hi, Graham,     I see that the Wing family carried on in Castle Bytham into the early 20th century, but my sources don't say who was selected to work on the church restoration in 1857.  That information might be in the parish chest records which are most likely at the Lincoln Archives.     An Internet search shows several references to your John Wing.  One records his birth date, which I suspect is actually his baptism date.  Our Anglo-Saxon ancestors didn't need birth certificates since they judged people by their character and not by the paper they carried.  It is only in recent centuries that we've been fixated on documenting everything.  Still, others have done some research and they may have found sources that could answer your questions.         Lou ________________________________ From: Graham Taylor <gtmt11@ntlworld.com> To: 'Louis Mills' <louis_mills@att.net>; eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [LIN] Admin. note: To-Do list Dear Lou I would like to know more about my 4x great grandfather John Wing 1756 - 1813. He was born and lived in Castle Bytham and apparently was from a family of Stonemasons. Several memorials bear his initials or a W (for Wing) initial. I would like to know if the Wing family had anything to do with refurbishment of St James in Castle Bytham and where they lived in the village. I have Sharpe ancestors and its interesting to see several graves of the Sharpes, right next to  the Church entrance with JW initials on the memorial stones. Why were they given such a prominent position? Did the Wing family always live in Castle Bytham or did they originate from another close by village? Many thanks Margaret (nee Sharpe) -----Original Message----- From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Louis Mills Sent: 19 March 2012 17:09 To: eng-lincsgen-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LIN] Admin. note: To-Do list This is the week to clean your mouse and keyboard.  When you shut down the computer today, put a paper towel over the keyboard to remind you to wipe it down before you use it again.  Tap all the cookie crumbs out of it and clean the mouse and the mouse pad before hitting the "On" button. Now, I want you to prepare for April.  Every village (and most families) had a "memorable" character.  Sometimes they were the nastiest person in town, the sweetest, most caring person, or the village clown.  I want you to collect your thoughts and memories about the character in Lincolnshire that left the strongest memories for you.  Then, starting April 1st, we will share them. Some of you will find this difficult.  But some of you may also have heard stories about "uncle Joe the smuggler"  or "aunt Edith, the candy lady." Share those stories with us.  But don't start until April 1st.  That will give you time to see if you can find some factual family history data about them. Now, clean the cat hair off the computer fan.  In fact, vacuum the cat. It's more fun than backing up your computer data.     Lou (list admin.) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

The church of St Peter at Arches was closed in 1929 and demolished 4 years later. The stones from this church were reused to build a new place of worship at St Giles, which was consecrated on 4 April 1936. The Above is from the Lincolnshire Archives when goggling in St Peters At The Arches, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, England Bill Stratton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Billington" <danny@billingtonuk.com> To: <ENG-LINCSGEN@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 2:46 PM Subject: [LIN] > > > What I am confused about is : > > > > Was it move entirely brick by brick and then rebuilt and renamed St Giles > on the new site or was it simply a case of moving the contents to St > Giles > an then demolishing St Peters? > > > > Either way , was the original site of St Peters - Silver Street ? > > > > Do an photo's/images exist of the original > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Dan > > > > > (This email, and any attachments, contains proprietary information some or > all of which may be confidential and legally privileged. It is for the > intended recipient only. If an addressing or transmission error has > misdirected this email, please notify the author by replying to this email > and then delete the message and any attachments from your system. If you > are > not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy or > print this email. In view of the provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998 > the > Directors do not monitor all the firm's outgoing emails. The Directors > accepts no liability for the contents of emails unconnected with the > affairs > of the firm or its clients. Although this email and any attachments have > been scanned for viruses, the success of scanning products is not > guaranteed. The recipient (s) should therefore carry out any checks that > they believe to be appropriate in this respect.) > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Dear Lou I would like to know more about my 4x great grandfather John Wing 1756 - 1813. He was born and lived in Castle Bytham and apparently was from a family of Stonemasons. Several memorials bear his initials or a W (for Wing) initial. I would like to know if the Wing family had anything to do with refurbishment of St James in Castle Bytham and where they lived in the village. I have Sharpe ancestors and its interesting to see several graves of the Sharpes, right next to the Church entrance with JW initials on the memorial stones. Why were they given such a prominent position? Did the Wing family always live in Castle Bytham or did they originate from another close by village? Many thanks Margaret (nee Sharpe) -----Original Message----- From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Louis Mills Sent: 19 March 2012 17:09 To: eng-lincsgen-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LIN] Admin. note: To-Do list This is the week to clean your mouse and keyboard.  When you shut down the computer today, put a paper towel over the keyboard to remind you to wipe it down before you use it again.  Tap all the cookie crumbs out of it and clean the mouse and the mouse pad before hitting the "On" button. Now, I want you to prepare for April.  Every village (and most families) had a "memorable" character.  Sometimes they were the nastiest person in town, the sweetest, most caring person, or the village clown.  I want you to collect your thoughts and memories about the character in Lincolnshire that left the strongest memories for you.  Then, starting April 1st, we will share them. Some of you will find this difficult.  But some of you may also have heard stories about "uncle Joe the smuggler"  or "aunt Edith, the candy lady."  Share those stories with us.  But don't start until April 1st.  That will give you time to see if you can find some factual family history data about them. Now, clean the cat hair off the computer fan.  In fact, vacuum the cat.  It's more fun than backing up your computer data.     Lou (list admin.) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

An idea of agricultural wages for the period is as http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~alan/family/N-Money.html#1850 It seems to be about 10s per week, exclusive of overtime- so would be more at harvest, for example. Margaret -----Original Message----- From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Carol Lylyk Sent: 18 March 2012 16:03 To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LIN] Bastardy Cases in the Newspaper I love reading all of your postings Anne. I was wondering if the amounts the men were ordered to pay would be a hardship for them as I have no idea what wages would have been in those days. I see that the one man, a butcher, was ordered to pay more so I guess the amounts were set according to their ability to pay. Also how long would they have to pay? Now days I believe they are required to support the child until they are at least 18. Carol Lylyk Canada ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anne Cole" <duncalf@one-name.org> To: <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 6:11 AM Subject: [LIN] Bastardy Cases in the Newspaper > There was only one last week so I saved it for this week. > > LRSM = Lincoln, Rutland and Stamford Mercury > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Right you are, Carol.  I should have told everyone, "Speak kindly" or they will haunt you. And I'm sure there is someone on the list who will loan you a cat.  Where's Fungus the cat when you need him?     Lou ________________________________ From: Carol J Markillie <cjmarkillie@gmail.com> To: Louis Mills <louis_mills@att.net>; eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 2:00 PM Subject: Re: [LIN] Admin. note: To-Do list Hi Lou: That's better than my long to-do list. Think I can borrow the neighbor's cat? He doesn't like me anyway (the cat). Trouble with telling stories about character relatives is that some of them have living descendants who 'do genealogy' and I don't know if they would be on this list or not. Carol

Hi Lou: That's better than my long to-do list. Think I can borrow the neighbor's cat? He doesn't like me anyway (the cat). Trouble with telling stories about character relatives is that some of them have living descendants who 'do genealogy' and I don't know if they would be on this list or not. Carol

Hi Anne: Many thanks - It is something I don't need right now but will keep the email in my file. thanks for taking the time and trouble - Carol On 3/19/12, Anne Cole <anne.cole@ntlworld.com> wrote: > Hello Carol, > > I just have 1930s. It was moved to the St Giles estate to the north of > Lincoln, but still inside the city limits. There should be something about > it in one of the Survey of Lincoln books. Probably Uphill Lincoln Part 2, > but we don't have it on Genfair, the Survey of Lincoln website doesn't give > a very full description, and I don't have one here to look at! > > Anne > > Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society > > Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 > > http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html > > Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index > > http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ > > Lincolnshire Family History Society > > http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen- >> bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Carol J Markillie >> Sent: 19 March 2012 20:25 >> To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com >> Subject: Re: [LIN] St Peters At The Arches, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, England >> >> Hi Anne: >> >> Do you have an approximate year that it was moved to St. Giles? I'm >> assuming that's not >> Tydd St. Giles - am I wrong? >> >> Many thanks - >> Carol at the end of the Olympic Peninsula Washington USA >> where the whales, porpoise and orcas play - hopefully still play >> >> >> On 3/17/12, Anne Cole <duncalf@one-name.org> wrote: >> > St Peter at Arches church was dismantled and moved lock, stock and >> barrel to >> > be the parish church for the St Giles estate where it still remains. >> Quite >> > true. >> > >> > Anne >> > >> > Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN- >> request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the >> subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >