Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 3480/10000
    1. Re: [HRT] RC & LDS- Received via another Rootsweb List
    2. cassy
    3. Hi All Has someone whose family where Catholic I find it very hard to get my own families records so I don't think it would matter who wanted to do these records , The Catholic Church would still object If you can travel the distant (if they are not local ) the parish priest will let you check the records but this also depends on the priest These records are our families so to me we should have ever right to see them Cassy Assistant Admin Black Country Potteries, and Wolverhampton Lists ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 9:17 PM Subject: Re: [HRT] RC & LDS- Received via another Rootsweb List > From: "Maggie Perkins" > >> I think some of you will be interested in the following >> Maggie. >> >> "Some Listers might be interested to know that the Catholic Church has >> denied the LDS access to their records. I've posted my thoughts on the >> matter to the Catholic News Service - the source of the following >> account.> > > Thanks for posting that, Maggie, however I am not sure that this news is > entirely surprising! The Catholic Church has always been secretive about > its records to everyone, never mind the LDS. Nor does it come as much > of a surprise that the religious views of the Catholic Church and the LDS > are diametrically opposed. As a non-believer, I am bound to observe that > in my opinion they deserve one another and it is extremely unlikely that > there will ever be much of a dialogue between them. > > Of course, this doesn't help us much as genealogists. The RC Church > should recognise it has responsibilities outside its own faithful to make > its > records available to all, but I tend to doubt it will. > > -- > Roy Stockdill > Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer > Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: > www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html > > "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, > and that is not being talked about." > OSCAR WILDE > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date: > 18/05/2008 09:31 > >

    05/18/2008 12:38:01
    1. [HRT] My mistake, I am sorry
    2. Elizabeth McMillan
    3. Good afternoon Listers, I would lie to apologise for my previous message where I did not delete all the other messages and forwarded them on again. I am sorry about that. Regards Libby McMillan

    05/18/2008 10:45:15
    1. Re: [HRT] Hemel Hempstead
    2. Elaine Saunders
    3. As a complete aside, does anyone remember the excellent detective series "Pie in the Sky" starring Richard Griffiths as the policeman turned chef. It's always being re-run on one cable channel or another. The bow-fronted restaurant from the series was situated in the High Street of Hemel old town backing on to the register office and church. It's in a dip behind some railings and is very easy to pick out if you're familiar with the series. It continued trading as a restaurant for some time after the series ended but, then became a shop. I don't know if it's still open. The odd Hemel location crops up in the series too - if you know what you're looking for. Elaine Saunders Author - A Book About Pub Names www.completetext.com

    05/18/2008 08:28:28
    1. Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire
    2. DAVID JUDD
    3. Roy I probably should have also added or included details that I have for William WELFORD and Margaret JUDD in Banbury, Oxfordshire, both born in North Oxfordshire Banbury & Adderbury respectively. I am primarily undertaking research into my JUDD ancestry in and around Banbury for the 17th century and have details from Manorial Court records that Margaret JUDD was married to one William WELFORD or WELLFORD who was a Gersey Weaver. From Family Search (Marriages) I note that there are entries for "About 1709" in Banbury but also 1710 for Hertford. I have details from the Oxfordshire Marriage Index and also the CD for Banbury PRs, but no marriage for William WELFORD to Margaret JUDD, hence my enquiry in Hertfordshire. I will try the Hertfordshire Records office online to see what further information I may learn. In the meantime should any body be able to offer advice or details this would be much appreciated. David Judd -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roy Stockdill Sent: 17 May 2008 17:39 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> > Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken > place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret JUDD, > these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking for > something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help or > advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd> Where did you get this from at FamilySearch? I can see no such marriage in the IGI, Ancestral File or Pedigree Resource File. I see spurious entries for William Welford but his supposed wife is shown purely as Mrs William Welford. However, these are LDS private submissions with no sources or evidence whatsover. The Allen Marriage Index is at the Herts RO but I'm not sure if the whole thing is online somewhere. You will probably have to hire someone to go to Hertford and look at it. However, if the marriage isn't on the Allen Index and you don't know which parish (if any) the marriage took place in, then it may be a long search. In any case, the details in 1710, or thereabouts, are likely to be fairly scant - probably no more than the names of the parties. -- Roy Stockdill Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about." OSCAR WILDE ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    05/18/2008 05:43:05
    1. [HRT] Andrew Gaddesden and Flamstead
    2. Angela Cox
    3. Hi, Thanks to all who helped solve my messaging problem. I have found the National Archives to be a good source of online info. for Flamstead (I'm after Catlins) and Gaddesden. Just putting the place names into the search gets quite a few results mostly part of the papers of the Sebright estate which throws up a lot of stuff to do with land and property rentals. I've also got a copy of Flamstead MIs on the way so if I can be of any use tracking down burials just ask. Angela __________________________________________________________ Sent from Yahoo! Mail. A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

    05/18/2008 03:54:05
    1. Re: [HRT] John ANDREW of Gaddesden - help locating burial and family
    2. Pat Wade
    3. Hi Donald, I would be interested in you ANDREW/S/ ANDERSON family. I don't have much info at present but I have Thomas ANDREWS and Sarah as parents of Eleanor, Martha, Rebecca, George, Mary, John, Thomas, James and Harriot. Eleanor was bap 1773 in Flamstead, Martha 1778 Trowley Bottom, Flamstead Rebecca, George and Mary also Flamstead, then John 1782 Great Gaddesden through to Harriot 1789 Great Gaddesden. Martha 1778 married Thomas KING in 1801 in Great Gaddesden. Could any of this fit in with what you have. Regards, Pat -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Donald Massey Sent: Sunday, 18 May 2008 6:03 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [HRT] John ANDREW of Gaddesden - help locating burial and family As already noted by another lister, there is no message here, but the subject line caught my attention. I am interested in the surname in both LG and Flamstead 1750-1800: I do not have any record of John, can you give me any other info about his family to see if there is a link. Have you tried under ANDERSON? It is well documented that in and around Hertfordshire, and probably elsewhere, he names are sometimes confused: they come from the same root, i.e son of Andrew.. I can let you have chapter and verse if you wish. Donald Massey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Angela Cox" <[email protected]> To: "hertfordshire rootsweb" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 3:49 PM Subject: [HRT] John ANDREW of Gaddesden - help locating burial and family > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    05/18/2008 03:24:30
    1. [HRT] Visiting Hemel Hempstead and surrounds in early June
    2. Elizabeth McMillan
    3. We are heading to London on 10 June and hope to find time to visit Hemel Hempstead and surrounds to see what sites we can find that were mentioned in the various census documents - Two Waters, etc - relating to our family. Is there a good place to start in the town where we can find our bearings and find maps etc? Regards Libby McMillan Elizabeth McMillan (Working in Samoa until mid May 2009) ail: [email protected] (gets me anytime, any place) On 18/05/2008, at 5:12 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. John ANDREW of Gaddesden - help locating burial and family > (Angela Cox) > 2. Marriage, Hertfordshire (DAVID JUDD) > 3. Re: Marriage, Hertfordshire (Roy Stockdill) > 4. John ANDREW died 1800 Herts. help locating burial please. > Living in Gt Gaddesden at time of death. Thanks (Angela Cox) > 5. Re: Marriage, Hertfordshire (Roy Stockdill) > 6. Re: John ANDREW died 1800 Herts. help locating burial please. > Living in Gt Gaddesden at time of death. Thanks (Roy Stockdill) > 7. Re: Marriage, Hertfordshire (Roy Stockdill) > 8. test (Angela Cox) > 9. RC & LDS- Received via another Rootsweb List (Maggie Perkins) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 14:49:35 +0000 (GMT) > From: Angela Cox <[email protected]> > Subject: [HRT] John ANDREW of Gaddesden - help locating burial and > family > To: hertfordshire rootsweb <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:02:26 +0100 > From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> > Subject: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken > place in > Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret JUDD, these > details > obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking for something more > conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help or advice > appreciated, > many thanks David Judd > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:39:27 +0100 > From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> > >> Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken >> place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret JUDD, >> these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking for >> something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help or >> advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd> > > Where did you get this from at FamilySearch? I can see no such > marriage in the IGI, Ancestral File or Pedigree Resource File. > > I see spurious entries for William Welford but his supposed wife is > shown > purely as Mrs William Welford. However, these are LDS private > submissions with no sources or evidence whatsover. > > The Allen Marriage Index is at the Herts RO but I'm not sure if the > whole > thing is online somewhere. You will probably have to hire someone to > go > to Hertford and look at it. However, if the marriage isn't on the > Allen Index > and you don't know which parish (if any) the marriage took place in, > then > it may be a long search. > > In any case, the details in 1710, or thereabouts, are likely to be > fairly > scant - probably no more than the names of the parties. > > -- > Roy Stockdill > Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer > Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: > www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html > > "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, > and that is not being talked about." > OSCAR WILDE > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 16:43:23 +0000 (GMT) > From: Angela Cox <[email protected]> > Subject: [HRT] John ANDREW died 1800 Herts. help locating burial > please. Living in Gt Gaddesden at time of death. Thanks > To: hertfordshire rootsweb <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:39:27 +0100 > From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> > >> Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken >> place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret JUDD, >> these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking for >> something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help or >> advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd> > > Where did you get this from at FamilySearch? I can see no such > marriage in the IGI, Ancestral File or Pedigree Resource File. > > I see spurious entries for William Welford but his supposed wife is > shown > purely as Mrs William Welford. However, these are LDS private > submissions with no sources or evidence whatsover. > > There is the Allen Marriage Index for Hertfordshire at the Hertford > Record > Office but I'm not if this is online somewhere. You will probably > > -- > Roy Stockdill > Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer > Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: > www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html > > "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, > and that is not being talked about." > OSCAR WILDE > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:59:21 +0100 > From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [HRT] John ANDREW died 1800 Herts. help locating burial > please. Living in Gt Gaddesden at time of death. Thanks > To: hertfordshire rootsweb <[email protected]>, > [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > From: Angela Cox <[email protected]> > > Well, I think that's the first time I've seen a whole message as a > header > and no text at all in the body of the message! > > However, I can tell you that there is a John Andrew on the NBI who was > buried at Great Gaddesden St John the Baptist on 19 Dec 1800. > > The source was the parish register and the data provider was > Hertfordshire Family History Society. > > -- > Roy Stockdill > Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer > Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: > www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html > > "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, > and that is not being talked about." > OSCAR WILDE > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 18:09:01 +0100 > From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date sent: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:39:27 +0100 > Priority: normal > Subject: Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire > Send reply to: [email protected] > >> From: "DAVID JUDD" <davi[email protected]> >> >>> Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken >>> place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret >>> JUDD, these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking >>> for something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help >>> or advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd> >> >> Where did you get this from at FamilySearch? I can see no such >> marriage in the IGI, Ancestral File or Pedigree Resource File. >> >> I see spurious entries for William Welford but his supposed wife is >> shown purely as Mrs William Welford. However, these are LDS private >> submissions with no sources or evidence whatsover. >> >> There is the Allen Marriage Index for Hertfordshire at the Hertford >> Record Office but I'm not if this is online somewhere. You will >> probably > > > I don't know what happened to the last part of the final sentence, > but I > intended to say you may have to go to the Hertford RO, or get someone > to go there for you, to look at it. > > -- > Roy Stockdill > Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer > Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: > www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html > > "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, > and that is not being talked about." > OSCAR WILDE > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 18:33:16 +0000 (GMT) > From: Angela Cox <[email protected]> > Subject: [HRT] test > To: hertfordshire rootsweb <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > > Hope this works > > > > __________________________________________________________ > Sent from Yahoo! Mail. > A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 20:11:25 +0100 > From: "Maggie Perkins" <[email protected]> > Subject: [HRT] RC & LDS- Received via another Rootsweb List > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; > reply-type=original > > I think some of you will be interested in the following > Maggie. > > "Some Listers might be interested to know that the Catholic Church has > denied > the LDS access to their records. I've posted my thoughts on the > matter to > the Catholic News Service - the source of the following account. > > > Vatican letter directs bishops to keep parish records from Mormons > > In an effort to block posthumous rebaptisms by the Church of Jesus > Christ of > Latter-day Saints, Catholic dioceses throughout the world have been > directed > by the Vatican not to give information in parish registers to the > Mormons' > Genealogical Society of Utah. > > An April 5 letter from the Vatican Congregation for Clergy, obtained > by > Catholic News Service in late April, asks episcopal conferences to > direct > all bishops to keep the Latter-day Saints from microfilming and > digitizing > information contained in those registers. > > The order came in light of "grave reservations" expressed in a Jan. 29 > letter from the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, > the > clergy congregation's letter said. > > Father James Massa, executive director of the U.S. bishops' > Secretariat of > Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, said the step was taken to > prevent > the Latter-day Saints from using records ? such as baptismal > documentation ? > to posthumously baptize by proxy the ancestors of church members. > > Posthumous baptisms by proxy have been a common practice for the > Latter-day > Saints ? commonly known as Mormons ? for more than a century, > allowing the > church's faithful to have their ancestors baptized into their faith > so they > may be united in the afterlife, said Mike Otterson, a spokesman in the > church's Salt Lake City headquarters. > > In a telephone interview with CNS May 1, Otterson said he wanted a > chance to > review the contents of the letter before commenting on how it will > affect > the Mormons' relationship with the Catholic Church. > > "This dicastery is bringing this matter to the attention of the > various > conferences of bishops," the letter reads. "The congregation > requests that > the conference notifies each diocesan bishop in order to ensure that > such a > detrimental practice is not permitted in his territory, due to the > confidentiality of the faithful and so as not to cooperate with the > erroneous practices of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day > Saints." > > The letter is dated 10 days before Pope Benedict XVI's April 15-20 > U.S. > visit, during which he presided over an ecumenical prayer service > attended > by two Mormon leaders. It marked the first time Mormons had > participated in > a papal prayer service. > > Father Massa said he could see how the policy stated in the letter > could > strain relations between the Catholic Church and the Latter-day > Saints. > > "It certainly has that potential," he said. "But I would also say > that the > purpose of interreligious dialogue is not to only identify > agreements, but > also to understand our differences. As Catholics, we have to make > very clear > to them their practice of so-called rebaptism is unacceptable from the > standpoint of Catholic truth." > > The Catholic Church will eventually open a dialogue with the Mormons > about > the rebaptism issue, Father Massa said, "but we are at the beginning > of the > beginning of a new relationship with the LDS. The first step in any > dialogue > is to establish trust and to seek friendship." > > The two faiths share intrinsic viewpoints on key issues the United > States is > facing, particularly the pro-life position on abortion and an > opposition to > same-sex marriage. > > However, theological differences have cropped up between Mormons and > Catholics in the past. > > In 2001 the Vatican's doctrinal congregation issued a ruling that > baptism > conferred by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints cannot be > considered a valid Christian baptism, thus requiring converts from > that > religion to Catholicism to receive a Catholic baptism. > > "We don't have an issue with the fact that the Catholic Church doesn't > recognize our baptisms, because we don't recognize theirs," Otterson > said. > "It's a difference of belief." > > When issuing its 2001 ruling, the Vatican said that even though the > Mormon > baptismal rite refers to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, the church's > beliefs about the identity of the three persons are so different from > Catholic and mainline Christian belief that the rite cannot be > regarded as a > Christian baptism. > > Latter-day Saints regard Jesus and the Holy Spirit as children of > the Father > and the Heavenly Mother. They believe that baptism was instituted by > the > Father, not Christ, and that it goes back to Adam and Eve. > > Msgr. J. Terrence Fitzgerald ? vicar general of the Diocese of Salt > Lake > City ? said he didn't understand why the Latter-day Saints church was > singled out in this latest Vatican policy regarding parish records. > > "We have a policy not to give out baptismal records to anyone unless > they > are entitled to have them," Msgr. Fitzgerald said of his diocese. > "That > isn't just for the Church of the Latter-day Saints. That is for all > groups." > > Though he said the Salt Lake City Diocese has enjoyed a long-standing > dialogue with the Latter-day Saints, Msgr. Fitzgerald said the > diocese does > not support giving the Mormons names for the sake of rebaptism. > > Mormons have been criticized by several other faiths ? perhaps most > passionately by the Jews ? for the church's practice of posthumous > baptism. > > Members of the Latter-day Saints believe baptizing their ancestors > by proxy > gives the dead an opportunity to embrace the faith in the afterlife. > The > actual baptism-by-proxy ceremony occurs in a Mormon temple, and is > intended > to wash sins away for the commencement of church membership. > > Jewish leaders have called the practice arrogant and said it is > disrespectful to the dead, especially Holocaust victims. > > "Baptism by proxy is a fundamentally important doctrine of the > Latter-day > Saints," Otterson said. "We have cooperative relationships with > churches, > governments ? both state and national ? going back to the last > century. Our > practice of negotiating for records and making them available for > genealogical research is very well known." > > Father Massa said he is not aware of aggressive attempts to obtain > baptismal > records at Catholic parishes in any of the U.S. dioceses. > > He also said the Catholic Church will continue to reach out to the > Mormons > and carry on the efforts of understanding that have already begun, > especially in Salt Lake City. > > "Profound theological differences are not an excuse for avoiding > dialogue, > but a reason for pursuing dialogue," Father Massa said. > > Source: Catholic News Service" > > > > > ------------------------------ > > To contact the ENG-HERTFORDSHIRE list administrator, send an email to > [email protected] > > To post a message to the ENG-HERTFORDSHIRE mailing list, send an > email to [email protected] > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the > email with no additional text. > > > End of ENG-HERTFORDSHIRE Digest, Vol 3, Issue 138 > ************************************************* > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. >

    05/18/2008 02:56:05
    1. Re: [HRT] Visiting Hemel Hempstead and surrounds in early June
    2. Anne Peat
    3. Hemel Hempstead and much of the surrounding area ( including Two Waters) comes under Dacorum District Council, so their websitemight be a good place to start. http://www.dacorum.gov.uk/ You can get Tourist information in the Civic Centre Tourist Information Point Address: Civic Centre Marlowes Hemel Hempstead Herts HP1 1HH Most of the internet map sites ( Multimap, Google Maps etc) will give you maps of Hemel most of them now linked to satellite photos of the area, to give you some idea of what is there now. HTH Anne On 17 May 2008, at 23:56, Elizabeth McMillan wrote: > We are heading to London on 10 June and hope to find time to visit > Hemel Hempstead and surrounds to see what sites we can find that were > mentioned in the various census documents - Two Waters, etc - relating > to our family. Is there a good place to start in the town where we > can find our bearings and find maps etc? > Regards > Libby McMillan > > Elizabeth McMillan (Working in Samoa until mid May 2009) > ail: [email protected] (gets me anytime, any place) > > > > > > > > > On 18/05/2008, at 5:12 AM, [email protected] > wrote: > >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. John ANDREW of Gaddesden - help locating burial and family >> (Angela Cox) >> 2. Marriage, Hertfordshire (DAVID JUDD) >> 3. Re: Marriage, Hertfordshire (Roy Stockdill) >> 4. John ANDREW died 1800 Herts. help locating burial please. >> Living in Gt Gaddesden at time of death. Thanks (Angela Cox) >> 5. Re: Marriage, Hertfordshire (Roy Stockdill) >> 6. Re: John ANDREW died 1800 Herts. help locating burial please. >> Living in Gt Gaddesden at time of death. Thanks (Roy Stockdill) >> 7. Re: Marriage, Hertfordshire (Roy Stockdill) >> 8. test (Angela Cox) >> 9. RC & LDS- Received via another Rootsweb List (Maggie Perkins) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 14:49:35 +0000 (GMT) >> From: Angela Cox <[email protected]> >> Subject: [HRT] John ANDREW of Gaddesden - help locating burial and >> family >> To: hertfordshire rootsweb <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:02:26 +0100 >> From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> >> Subject: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire >> To: <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken >> place in >> Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret JUDD, these >> details >> obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking for something more >> conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help or advice >> appreciated, >> many thanks David Judd >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:39:27 +0100 >> From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire >> To: <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >> >> From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> >> >>> Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken >>> place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret >>> JUDD, >>> these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking for >>> something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help or >>> advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd> >> >> Where did you get this from at FamilySearch? I can see no such >> marriage in the IGI, Ancestral File or Pedigree Resource File. >> >> I see spurious entries for William Welford but his supposed wife is >> shown >> purely as Mrs William Welford. However, these are LDS private >> submissions with no sources or evidence whatsover. >> >> The Allen Marriage Index is at the Herts RO but I'm not sure if the >> whole >> thing is online somewhere. You will probably have to hire someone to >> go >> to Hertford and look at it. However, if the marriage isn't on the >> Allen Index >> and you don't know which parish (if any) the marriage took place in, >> then >> it may be a long search. >> >> In any case, the details in 1710, or thereabouts, are likely to be >> fairly >> scant - probably no more than the names of the parties. >> >> -- >> Roy Stockdill >> Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer >> Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: >> www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html >> >> "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, >> and that is not being talked about." >> OSCAR WILDE >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 16:43:23 +0000 (GMT) >> From: Angela Cox <[email protected]> >> Subject: [HRT] John ANDREW died 1800 Herts. help locating burial >> please. Living in Gt Gaddesden at time of death. Thanks >> To: hertfordshire rootsweb <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:39:27 +0100 >> From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire >> To: <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >> >> From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> >> >>> Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken >>> place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret >>> JUDD, >>> these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking for >>> something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help or >>> advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd> >> >> Where did you get this from at FamilySearch? I can see no such >> marriage in the IGI, Ancestral File or Pedigree Resource File. >> >> I see spurious entries for William Welford but his supposed wife is >> shown >> purely as Mrs William Welford. However, these are LDS private >> submissions with no sources or evidence whatsover. >> >> There is the Allen Marriage Index for Hertfordshire at the Hertford >> Record >> Office but I'm not if this is online somewhere. You will probably >> >> -- >> Roy Stockdill >> Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer >> Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: >> www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html >> >> "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, >> and that is not being talked about." >> OSCAR WILDE >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:59:21 +0100 >> From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [HRT] John ANDREW died 1800 Herts. help locating burial >> please. Living in Gt Gaddesden at time of death. Thanks >> To: hertfordshire rootsweb <[email protected]>, >> [email protected] >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >> >> From: Angela Cox <[email protected]> >> >> Well, I think that's the first time I've seen a whole message as a >> header >> and no text at all in the body of the message! >> >> However, I can tell you that there is a John Andrew on the NBI who >> was >> buried at Great Gaddesden St John the Baptist on 19 Dec 1800. >> >> The source was the parish register and the data provider was >> Hertfordshire Family History Society. >> >> -- >> Roy Stockdill >> Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer >> Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: >> www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html >> >> "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, >> and that is not being talked about." >> OSCAR WILDE >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 7 >> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 18:09:01 +0100 >> From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire >> To: <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >> >> From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Date sent: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:39:27 +0100 >> Priority: normal >> Subject: Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire >> Send reply to: [email protected] >> >>> From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken >>>> place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret >>>> JUDD, these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking >>>> for something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, >>>> help >>>> or advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd> >>> >>> Where did you get this from at FamilySearch? I can see no such >>> marriage in the IGI, Ancestral File or Pedigree Resource File. >>> >>> I see spurious entries for William Welford but his supposed wife is >>> shown purely as Mrs William Welford. However, these are LDS private >>> submissions with no sources or evidence whatsover. >>> >>> There is the Allen Marriage Index for Hertfordshire at the Hertford >>> Record Office but I'm not if this is online somewhere. You will >>> probably > >> >> I don't know what happened to the last part of the final sentence, >> but I >> intended to say you may have to go to the Hertford RO, or get someone >> to go there for you, to look at it. >> >> -- >> Roy Stockdill >> Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer >> Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: >> www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html >> >> "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, >> and that is not being talked about." >> OSCAR WILDE >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 8 >> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 18:33:16 +0000 (GMT) >> From: Angela Cox <[email protected]> >> Subject: [HRT] test >> To: hertfordshire rootsweb <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> >> >> Hope this works >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> Sent from Yahoo! Mail. >> A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 9 >> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 20:11:25 +0100 >> From: "Maggie Perkins" <[email protected]> >> Subject: [HRT] RC & LDS- Received via another Rootsweb List >> To: <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; >> reply-type=original >> >> I think some of you will be interested in the following >> Maggie. >> >> "Some Listers might be interested to know that the Catholic Church >> has >> denied >> the LDS access to their records. I've posted my thoughts on the >> matter to >> the Catholic News Service - the source of the following account. >> >> >> Vatican letter directs bishops to keep parish records from Mormons >> >> In an effort to block posthumous rebaptisms by the Church of Jesus >> Christ of >> Latter-day Saints, Catholic dioceses throughout the world have been >> directed >> by the Vatican not to give information in parish registers to the >> Mormons' >> Genealogical Society of Utah. >> >> An April 5 letter from the Vatican Congregation for Clergy, obtained >> by >> Catholic News Service in late April, asks episcopal conferences to >> direct >> all bishops to keep the Latter-day Saints from microfilming and >> digitizing >> information contained in those registers. >> >> The order came in light of "grave reservations" expressed in a Jan. >> 29 >> letter from the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, >> the >> clergy congregation's letter said. >> >> Father James Massa, executive director of the U.S. bishops' >> Secretariat of >> Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, said the step was taken to >> prevent >> the Latter-day Saints from using records ? such as baptismal >> documentation ? >> to posthumously baptize by proxy the ancestors of church members. >> >> Posthumous baptisms by proxy have been a common practice for the >> Latter-day >> Saints ? commonly known as Mormons ? for more than a century, >> allowing the >> church's faithful to have their ancestors baptized into their faith >> so they >> may be united in the afterlife, said Mike Otterson, a spokesman in >> the >> church's Salt Lake City headquarters. >> >> In a telephone interview with CNS May 1, Otterson said he wanted a >> chance to >> review the contents of the letter before commenting on how it will >> affect >> the Mormons' relationship with the Catholic Church. >> >> "This dicastery is bringing this matter to the attention of the >> various >> conferences of bishops," the letter reads. "The congregation >> requests that >> the conference notifies each diocesan bishop in order to ensure that >> such a >> detrimental practice is not permitted in his territory, due to the >> confidentiality of the faithful and so as not to cooperate with the >> erroneous practices of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day >> Saints." >> >> The letter is dated 10 days before Pope Benedict XVI's April 15-20 >> U.S. >> visit, during which he presided over an ecumenical prayer service >> attended >> by two Mormon leaders. It marked the first time Mormons had >> participated in >> a papal prayer service. >> >> Father Massa said he could see how the policy stated in the letter >> could >> strain relations between the Catholic Church and the Latter-day >> Saints. >> >> "It certainly has that potential," he said. "But I would also say >> that the >> purpose of interreligious dialogue is not to only identify >> agreements, but >> also to understand our differences. As Catholics, we have to make >> very clear >> to them their practice of so-called rebaptism is unacceptable from >> the >> standpoint of Catholic truth." >> >> The Catholic Church will eventually open a dialogue with the Mormons >> about >> the rebaptism issue, Father Massa said, "but we are at the beginning >> of the >> beginning of a new relationship with the LDS. The first step in any >> dialogue >> is to establish trust and to seek friendship." >> >> The two faiths share intrinsic viewpoints on key issues the United >> States is >> facing, particularly the pro-life position on abortion and an >> opposition to >> same-sex marriage. >> >> However, theological differences have cropped up between Mormons and >> Catholics in the past. >> >> In 2001 the Vatican's doctrinal congregation issued a ruling that >> baptism >> conferred by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints cannot >> be >> considered a valid Christian baptism, thus requiring converts from >> that >> religion to Catholicism to receive a Catholic baptism. >> >> "We don't have an issue with the fact that the Catholic Church >> doesn't >> recognize our baptisms, because we don't recognize theirs," Otterson >> said. >> "It's a difference of belief." >> >> When issuing its 2001 ruling, the Vatican said that even though the >> Mormon >> baptismal rite refers to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, the >> church's >> beliefs about the identity of the three persons are so different from >> Catholic and mainline Christian belief that the rite cannot be >> regarded as a >> Christian baptism. >> >> Latter-day Saints regard Jesus and the Holy Spirit as children of >> the Father >> and the Heavenly Mother. They believe that baptism was instituted by >> the >> Father, not Christ, and that it goes back to Adam and Eve. >> >> Msgr. J. Terrence Fitzgerald ? vicar general of the Diocese of Salt >> Lake >> City ? said he didn't understand why the Latter-day Saints church was >> singled out in this latest Vatican policy regarding parish records. >> >> "We have a policy not to give out baptismal records to anyone unless >> they >> are entitled to have them," Msgr. Fitzgerald said of his diocese. >> "That >> isn't just for the Church of the Latter-day Saints. That is for all >> groups." >> >> Though he said the Salt Lake City Diocese has enjoyed a long-standing >> dialogue with the Latter-day Saints, Msgr. Fitzgerald said the >> diocese does >> not support giving the Mormons names for the sake of rebaptism. >> >> Mormons have been criticized by several other faiths ? perhaps most >> passionately by the Jews ? for the church's practice of posthumous >> baptism. >> >> Members of the Latter-day Saints believe baptizing their ancestors >> by proxy >> gives the dead an opportunity to embrace the faith in the afterlife. >> The >> actual baptism-by-proxy ceremony occurs in a Mormon temple, and is >> intended >> to wash sins away for the commencement of church membership. >> >> Jewish leaders have called the practice arrogant and said it is >> disrespectful to the dead, especially Holocaust victims. >> >> "Baptism by proxy is a fundamentally important doctrine of the >> Latter-day >> Saints," Otterson said. "We have cooperative relationships with >> churches, >> governments ? both state and national ? going back to the last >> century. Our >> practice of negotiating for records and making them available for >> genealogical research is very well known." >> >> Father Massa said he is not aware of aggressive attempts to obtain >> baptismal >> records at Catholic parishes in any of the U.S. dioceses. >> >> He also said the Catholic Church will continue to reach out to the >> Mormons >> and carry on the efforts of understanding that have already begun, >> especially in Salt Lake City. >> >> "Profound theological differences are not an excuse for avoiding >> dialogue, >> but a reason for pursuing dialogue," Father Massa said. >> >> Source: Catholic News Service" >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> To contact the ENG-HERTFORDSHIRE list administrator, send an email to >> [email protected] >> >> To post a message to the ENG-HERTFORDSHIRE mailing list, send an >> email to [email protected] >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] >> with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and >> the body of the >> email with no additional text. >> >> >> End of ENG-HERTFORDSHIRE Digest, Vol 3, Issue 138 >> ************************************************* >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message

    05/18/2008 02:07:39
    1. Re: [HRT] Visiting Hemel Hempstead and surrounds in early June
    2. Peter Jarman
    3. Hi Libby Hemel was selected as a "New Town" after the war and has been considerably enlarged and rebuilt to the point where all the seperate places; Two Waters, Aspley, Hemel, Leverstock Green, Cupid Green all now are really just parts of Hemel Hempstead. You might be lucky and find a few streets in the older parts still existing. More outlying areas; Gaddesden Row, etc you should find better. Peter Jarman ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elizabeth McMillan" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 11:56 PM Subject: [HRT] Visiting Hemel Hempstead and surrounds in early June > We are heading to London on 10 June and hope to find time to visit > Hemel Hempstead and surrounds to see what sites we can find that were > mentioned in the various census documents - Two Waters, etc - relating > to our family. Is there a good place to start in the town where we > can find our bearings and find maps etc? > Regards > Libby McMillan > > Elizabeth McMillan (Working in Samoa until mid May 2009) > ail: [email protected] (gets me anytime, any place) > >

    05/18/2008 02:03:21
    1. Re: [HRT] RC & LDS- Received via another Rootsweb List
    2. Roy Stockdill
    3. From: "Maggie Perkins" > I think some of you will be interested in the following > Maggie. > > "Some Listers might be interested to know that the Catholic Church has > denied the LDS access to their records. I've posted my thoughts on the > matter to the Catholic News Service - the source of the following > account.> Thanks for posting that, Maggie, however I am not sure that this news is entirely surprising! The Catholic Church has always been secretive about its records to everyone, never mind the LDS. Nor does it come as much of a surprise that the religious views of the Catholic Church and the LDS are diametrically opposed. As a non-believer, I am bound to observe that in my opinion they deserve one another and it is extremely unlikely that there will ever be much of a dialogue between them. Of course, this doesn't help us much as genealogists. The RC Church should recognise it has responsibilities outside its own faithful to make its records available to all, but I tend to doubt it will. -- Roy Stockdill Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about." OSCAR WILDE

    05/17/2008 03:17:34
    1. Re: [HRT] John ANDREW of Gaddesden - help locating burial and family
    2. Donald Massey
    3. As already noted by another lister, there is no message here, but the subject line caught my attention. I am interested in the surname in both LG and Flamstead 1750-1800: I do not have any record of John, can you give me any other info about his family to see if there is a link. Have you tried under ANDERSON? It is well documented that in and around Hertfordshire, and probably elsewhere, he names are sometimes confused: they come from the same root, i.e son of Andrew.. I can let you have chapter and verse if you wish. Donald Massey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Angela Cox" <[email protected]> To: "hertfordshire rootsweb" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 3:49 PM Subject: [HRT] John ANDREW of Gaddesden - help locating burial and family > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    05/17/2008 03:02:43
    1. [HRT] RC & LDS- Received via another Rootsweb List
    2. Maggie Perkins
    3. I think some of you will be interested in the following Maggie. "Some Listers might be interested to know that the Catholic Church has denied the LDS access to their records. I've posted my thoughts on the matter to the Catholic News Service - the source of the following account. Vatican letter directs bishops to keep parish records from Mormons In an effort to block posthumous rebaptisms by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Catholic dioceses throughout the world have been directed by the Vatican not to give information in parish registers to the Mormons' Genealogical Society of Utah. An April 5 letter from the Vatican Congregation for Clergy, obtained by Catholic News Service in late April, asks episcopal conferences to direct all bishops to keep the Latter-day Saints from microfilming and digitizing information contained in those registers. The order came in light of "grave reservations" expressed in a Jan. 29 letter from the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the clergy congregation's letter said. Father James Massa, executive director of the U.S. bishops' Secretariat of Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, said the step was taken to prevent the Latter-day Saints from using records — such as baptismal documentation — to posthumously baptize by proxy the ancestors of church members. Posthumous baptisms by proxy have been a common practice for the Latter-day Saints — commonly known as Mormons — for more than a century, allowing the church's faithful to have their ancestors baptized into their faith so they may be united in the afterlife, said Mike Otterson, a spokesman in the church's Salt Lake City headquarters. In a telephone interview with CNS May 1, Otterson said he wanted a chance to review the contents of the letter before commenting on how it will affect the Mormons' relationship with the Catholic Church. "This dicastery is bringing this matter to the attention of the various conferences of bishops," the letter reads. "The congregation requests that the conference notifies each diocesan bishop in order to ensure that such a detrimental practice is not permitted in his territory, due to the confidentiality of the faithful and so as not to cooperate with the erroneous practices of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." The letter is dated 10 days before Pope Benedict XVI's April 15-20 U.S. visit, during which he presided over an ecumenical prayer service attended by two Mormon leaders. It marked the first time Mormons had participated in a papal prayer service. Father Massa said he could see how the policy stated in the letter could strain relations between the Catholic Church and the Latter-day Saints. "It certainly has that potential," he said. "But I would also say that the purpose of interreligious dialogue is not to only identify agreements, but also to understand our differences. As Catholics, we have to make very clear to them their practice of so-called rebaptism is unacceptable from the standpoint of Catholic truth." The Catholic Church will eventually open a dialogue with the Mormons about the rebaptism issue, Father Massa said, "but we are at the beginning of the beginning of a new relationship with the LDS. The first step in any dialogue is to establish trust and to seek friendship." The two faiths share intrinsic viewpoints on key issues the United States is facing, particularly the pro-life position on abortion and an opposition to same-sex marriage. However, theological differences have cropped up between Mormons and Catholics in the past. In 2001 the Vatican's doctrinal congregation issued a ruling that baptism conferred by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints cannot be considered a valid Christian baptism, thus requiring converts from that religion to Catholicism to receive a Catholic baptism. "We don't have an issue with the fact that the Catholic Church doesn't recognize our baptisms, because we don't recognize theirs," Otterson said. "It's a difference of belief." When issuing its 2001 ruling, the Vatican said that even though the Mormon baptismal rite refers to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, the church's beliefs about the identity of the three persons are so different from Catholic and mainline Christian belief that the rite cannot be regarded as a Christian baptism. Latter-day Saints regard Jesus and the Holy Spirit as children of the Father and the Heavenly Mother. They believe that baptism was instituted by the Father, not Christ, and that it goes back to Adam and Eve. Msgr. J. Terrence Fitzgerald — vicar general of the Diocese of Salt Lake City — said he didn't understand why the Latter-day Saints church was singled out in this latest Vatican policy regarding parish records. "We have a policy not to give out baptismal records to anyone unless they are entitled to have them," Msgr. Fitzgerald said of his diocese. "That isn't just for the Church of the Latter-day Saints. That is for all groups." Though he said the Salt Lake City Diocese has enjoyed a long-standing dialogue with the Latter-day Saints, Msgr. Fitzgerald said the diocese does not support giving the Mormons names for the sake of rebaptism. Mormons have been criticized by several other faiths — perhaps most passionately by the Jews — for the church's practice of posthumous baptism. Members of the Latter-day Saints believe baptizing their ancestors by proxy gives the dead an opportunity to embrace the faith in the afterlife. The actual baptism-by-proxy ceremony occurs in a Mormon temple, and is intended to wash sins away for the commencement of church membership. Jewish leaders have called the practice arrogant and said it is disrespectful to the dead, especially Holocaust victims. "Baptism by proxy is a fundamentally important doctrine of the Latter-day Saints," Otterson said. "We have cooperative relationships with churches, governments — both state and national — going back to the last century. Our practice of negotiating for records and making them available for genealogical research is very well known." Father Massa said he is not aware of aggressive attempts to obtain baptismal records at Catholic parishes in any of the U.S. dioceses. He also said the Catholic Church will continue to reach out to the Mormons and carry on the efforts of understanding that have already begun, especially in Salt Lake City. "Profound theological differences are not an excuse for avoiding dialogue, but a reason for pursuing dialogue," Father Massa said. Source: Catholic News Service"

    05/17/2008 02:11:25
    1. [HRT] test
    2. Angela Cox
    3. Hope this works __________________________________________________________ Sent from Yahoo! Mail. A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

    05/17/2008 12:33:16
    1. Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire
    2. Roy Stockdill
    3. From: "Roy Stockdill" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Date sent: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:39:27 +0100 Priority: normal Subject: Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire Send reply to: [email protected] > From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> > > > Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken > > place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret > > JUDD, these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking > > for something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help > > or advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd> > > Where did you get this from at FamilySearch? I can see no such > marriage in the IGI, Ancestral File or Pedigree Resource File. > > I see spurious entries for William Welford but his supposed wife is > shown purely as Mrs William Welford. However, these are LDS private > submissions with no sources or evidence whatsover. > > There is the Allen Marriage Index for Hertfordshire at the Hertford > Record Office but I'm not if this is online somewhere. You will > probably > I don't know what happened to the last part of the final sentence, but I intended to say you may have to go to the Hertford RO, or get someone to go there for you, to look at it. -- Roy Stockdill Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about." OSCAR WILDE

    05/17/2008 12:09:01
    1. Re: [HRT] John ANDREW died 1800 Herts. help locating burial please. Living in Gt Gaddesden at time of death. Thanks
    2. Roy Stockdill
    3. From: Angela Cox <[email protected]> Well, I think that's the first time I've seen a whole message as a header and no text at all in the body of the message! However, I can tell you that there is a John Andrew on the NBI who was buried at Great Gaddesden St John the Baptist on 19 Dec 1800. The source was the parish register and the data provider was Hertfordshire Family History Society. -- Roy Stockdill Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about." OSCAR WILDE

    05/17/2008 11:59:21
    1. Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire
    2. Roy Stockdill
    3. From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> > Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken > place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret JUDD, > these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking for > something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help or > advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd> Where did you get this from at FamilySearch? I can see no such marriage in the IGI, Ancestral File or Pedigree Resource File. I see spurious entries for William Welford but his supposed wife is shown purely as Mrs William Welford. However, these are LDS private submissions with no sources or evidence whatsover. The Allen Marriage Index is at the Herts RO but I'm not sure if the whole thing is online somewhere. You will probably have to hire someone to go to Hertford and look at it. However, if the marriage isn't on the Allen Index and you don't know which parish (if any) the marriage took place in, then it may be a long search. In any case, the details in 1710, or thereabouts, are likely to be fairly scant - probably no more than the names of the parties. -- Roy Stockdill Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about." OSCAR WILDE

    05/17/2008 11:39:27
    1. Re: [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire
    2. Roy Stockdill
    3. From: "DAVID JUDD" <[email protected]> > Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken > place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret JUDD, > these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking for > something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help or > advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd> Where did you get this from at FamilySearch? I can see no such marriage in the IGI, Ancestral File or Pedigree Resource File. I see spurious entries for William Welford but his supposed wife is shown purely as Mrs William Welford. However, these are LDS private submissions with no sources or evidence whatsover. There is the Allen Marriage Index for Hertfordshire at the Hertford Record Office but I'm not if this is online somewhere. You will probably -- Roy Stockdill Professional genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about." OSCAR WILDE

    05/17/2008 11:39:27
    1. [HRT] Marriage, Hertfordshire
    2. DAVID JUDD
    3. Would any one be able to advise on a marriage which may have taken place in Hertford circa 1710 of a William WELFORD to a Margaret JUDD, these details obtained from "Family Search" and I am looking for something more conclusive, dates location etc, any details, help or advice appreciated, many thanks David Judd

    05/17/2008 11:02:26
  1. 05/17/2008 10:43:23
    1. Re: [HRT] Visiting Hemel Hempstead and surrounds in early June
    2. Manaia Alofa
    3. Talofa/Hello Elizabeth: Have we met? Or possibly corresponded? Are you originally from the UK? How long is your stay in Hertford? My rellies reside in Sussex and Cornwall but they can meet with you nearby - grin. Your name is awfully familiar. Manuia/Regards, --Manaia ++++ --- Elizabeth McMillan <[email protected]> wrote: > We are heading to London on 10 June and hope to find > time to visit > Hemel Hempstead and surrounds to see what sites we > can find that were > mentioned in the various census documents - Two > Waters, etc - relating > to our family. Is there a good place to start in > the town where we > can find our bearings and find maps etc? > Regards > Libby McMillan > > Elizabeth McMillan (Working in Samoa until mid May > 2009) > ail: [email protected] (gets me anytime, any > place)

    05/17/2008 10:16:04