Vicki/List, Results from 1851 census search Price Family in Kilpeck Ref 1978/ Folio 536a and b John Price 44 Elizabeth 38 John 13 Daniel 12 Mary 9 Can i just ask if anyone else has done the look-up for Vicki, that the results be copied to the list. Not wanting to a moaning old git, but it does save the search being done 2 or 3 times by different people, also as this index has been available for some years now, surely someone must has also done the look-up. Phil Bufton Vice Chairman Herefordshire FHS www.rootsweb.com/~ukhfhs ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael & Vicky Harding" <mharding@ihug.co.nz> To: <ENG-HEREFORD-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 12:57 AM Subject: [HEF] Look up PRICE in Kilpeck census 1851 > Could SKS please look up this family in 1851 census > John PRICE Head 44 Innkeeper maybe at Bagylydiart in Kilpeck > Elizabeth PRICE wife 48 > Daniel son 12 > Mary daur 9 > Just found out that John in this family is very likely a brother to my > Elizabeth PRICE who married a KNIGHT who lived at Pigeon House Orcop, and > Mary Ann PRICE who married James PALMER of Dymock Glos and went to Utah. > Thank you very much > Vicky in new Zealand. > > > ==== ENG-HEREFORD Mailing List ==== > . > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > >

Phil wrote:- > Can i just ask if anyone else has done the look-up for >Vicki, that the > results be copied to the list. > Not wanting to a moaning old git, but it does save the >search being done >2 > or 3 times by different people. Nothing to do with being a moaning old git, Phil - it's only common sense and common courtesy that look-up results should be posted to the list. I know from personal experience how exasperating it can be to spend time researching something only to be told by the recipient that they've already had the information from someone else off-list. Hope you don't mind if I take this opportunity to point out to fellow-listers that it's simply a matter of clicking on the "REPLY ALL" button rather than just the "reply" one. Gordon (another moaning old git)