On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 07:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Elizabeth Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > When researching my BRIDGEMANs in the Newtown P/R > fiche I remembered seeing some BEYMAN/BAYMANs. > I have extracted the following from the Newtown P/Rs:- > Checked from 1666-1837(as much as I was able to > decipher) > There do not appear to be any entries for the name > before 1758. > Baptisms > 05 Feb 1758-Mary d John & Mary of Itchingswell > > 20 May 1774-Ann d John & Pheobe > 11 Apr 1784-Anne d John & Pheobe > > 19 Jan 1780-Catherine d John & Sarah > 04 Mar 1781-John s " > -- May 1782-Ann d " > 18 Jan 1784-Sarah d " > -- Sep 1785-James s " > 06 May 1787-Robert s " > 05 Apr 1789-Maria d " > 26 Dec 1794-Elizabeth d " > 16 Aug 1795-Mary d " > > 27 Sep 1812-George s John & Amey > 19 Feb 1815-Caroline d John & Amey That confirms what I suspected about George being a sibling and gives a more accurate birth date for him than the census records. The baptism of John in 1781 possibly gives us the John who fathered these two and John. > Buriels > 26 May 1769-Mary wife of John BAYMAN The Mary of Itchingswell? The early St. Mary Kingsclere records on the IGI do not have any Baymans so we have to look for their origins elsewhere. I don't have the early Ecchinswell fiche which from 1610-1744 were separate from Kingsclere > 04 Jul 1776-Ann BAYMAN 2yrs Ann bapt 1774, dau of John & Phoebe > 08 Jun 1781-Catherine BAYMAN 17 mnths Catherine bapt 1780 to John & Sarah > 16 Jun 1790-John BAYMAN 63 yrs John, husband of Mary, of Itchenwell?? > 14 Aug 1791-Ann BAYMAN 9 yrs Ann bapt 1782 to John & Sarah > 20 Mar 1802-Maria BAYMAN d John & Sarah 13 yrs Maria bapt 1789 to John & Sarah > 13 May 1824-John BAYMAN 72 yrs > 27 Aug 1824-Sarah BAYMAN 74 yrs The John & Sarah above which would make them born ca1752 and 1750 respectively so married, assuming Catherine is firstborn child, in their late 20s. > I have not found any BAYMAN marriages! The IGI doesn't have much to offer in Hants/Berks either but there is quite a cluster in Ramsbury, Wilts which is not far away. The first group I found were 'member submitted' data, then I found the 'extracted' batches at C058211/M058211but no entries fit the Newtown families above. I have put a Bayman tree on the Kingsclere Families website at http://startx.co.uk:2317/Kingsclere?m=NG&n=Bayman&t=N and any comments will be welcome -- John Lewis Debian (Sid) with the GeneWeb genealogy package