The marriage certificate for George White and Ann Hunt has just arrived in the post, as I anticipated it took place at St. Lawrence, Ecchinswell. Entry no 46 in the register of Marriages, in the Registration District of Kingsclere 1856 Nov 15th George White full bachelor labourer Ecchinswell James White labourer Ann Hunt 19 spinster -- Ecchinswell John Salter Hunt labourer Married after banns by Lewis Rigg Vicar both George and Ann made their mark as did witnesses Thomas Haynes & Eliza Vince -- John Lewis Debian & the GeneWeb genealogical data server

Thank you for that John, it ties in with your thoughts of James and Ann Povey as the parents. We now have two Daniel HUNTs born Ecchingswell 1854-1856:- 1. Son of Ann 2. Son of George and Ann Maria Lansley You have identified two baptisms but I can only find one entry in Ancestry - Daniel HUNT Dec 1854- Kingsclere - 2c 173 which must relate to George's son. The only other entry that might tie in is Daniel WHITE Dec 1856- Kingsclere - 2c 191. Could Ann have waited until after the marriage before registering the birth even though the child had been baptised? ----- Original Message ----- From: "john lewis" <zen57162@zen.co.uk> To: <eng-hampshire-kingsclere@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:39 PM Subject: Re: [King] Ann HUNT > The marriage certificate for George White and Ann Hunt has just > arrived in the post, as I anticipated it took place at St. Lawrence, > Ecchinswell. > > Entry no 46 in the register of Marriages, in the Registration > District of Kingsclere > 1856 Nov 15th > > George White full bachelor labourer Ecchinswell James White labourer > Ann Hunt 19 spinster -- Ecchinswell John Salter Hunt labourer > > Married after banns by Lewis Rigg Vicar > > both George and Ann made their mark as did witnesses Thomas Haynes & > Eliza Vince > > -- > John Lewis > Debian & the GeneWeb genealogical data server > --------------------------------------- >>From Kingsclere. ALL surnames in CAPITAL letter please. Christian name >>Lawrence surname LAWRENCE. > --------------------------------------- > If you get unsubscribed and did not ask to be unsubscribed, please email > eng-hampshire-kingsclere-admin@rootsweb.com > --------------------------------------- > Make sure your Anti Virus Protection is updated and do a weekly backup of > your files. > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-HAMPSHIRE-KINGSCLERE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:37:34 -0000 "Geoff Hunt" <geoff.t.hunt@btinternet.com> wrote: > Thank you for that John, it ties in with your thoughts of James and > Ann Povey as the parents. > > We now have two Daniel HUNTs born Ecchingswell 1854-1856:- > 1. Son of Ann > 2. Son of George and Ann Maria Lansley > > You have identified two baptisms but I can only find one entry in > Ancestry - Daniel HUNT Dec 1854- Kingsclere - 2c 173 which must > relate to George's son. > > The only other entry that might tie in is Daniel WHITE Dec 1856- > Kingsclere - 2c 191. There were two Daniel Whites in Kingsclere Registration District in 1861 both 4 years old. the first is the son of George and Ann and living in Ecchinswell, the second the grandson of Jonathan & Jane White and living in Woodcot. The 1851 Census shows Jonathan & Jane had 6 children living then, including a 2 year old Daniel. This Daniel is probably the one who died in 1855 Deaths Sep 1855: White Daniel, Kingsclere 2c 118 > Could Ann have waited until after the marriage before registering the > birth even though the child had been baptised? I don't think is very likely, there were penalties for late registration and if delayed that long after birth I think the Registrar would refuse to register the birth 1836 Act. XXII. And be it enacted, That after the Expiration of Forty-two Days following the Day of the Birth of any Child it shall not be lawful for any Registrar to register such Birth, save as herein-after is next mentioned ; provided that, in case the Birth of any Child shall not have been registered according to the Provisions herein-before contained, it shall be lawful for any person present at the Birth of such Child, or for the Father or Guardian thereof, at any Time within Six Calendar Months next after the Birth, to make a solemn Declaration of the Particulars required to be known touching the Birth of such Child, according to the best of his or her Knowledge and Belief, and it thereupon be lawful for the said Registrar then and there, in the Presence of the Superintendent Registrar, to register the Birth of the said Child according to the Information of the Person making the said Declaration ; and in every such Case the Superintendent Registrar before whom the said Declaration is made shall sign the Entry of Birth as well as the registrar, and for every such Registry as last aforesaid the Superintendent Registrar shall be entitled to have a Fee of Two Shillings and Sixpence from the Person requiring the same to be registered ; and the Registrar, over and above the Fee herein-after enacted in respect of every birth registered by him, shall be entitled, unless the Delay shall have been occasioned by his Default, to have a Fee of Five Shillings from the person requiring the same to be registered ; and no Register of Births shall be given in Evidence to prove the Birth of any Child wherein it shall appear that Forty-two Days have intervened between the Day of the Birth and the Day of the Registration of the Birth of such Child, unless the Entry shall be signed by the Superintendent Registrar ; and every person who shall knowingly register or cause to be registered the Birth of any Child, otherwise than herein-before is last mentioned, after the Expiration of Forty-two Days following the Day of Birth of such Child, shall forfeit and pay for every such Offence a Sum not exceeding Fifty Pounds. XXIII. And be it enacted, That aere, in the Presence of the Superintendent Registrar, to register the Birth of the said Child according to the Information of the Person making the said Declaration ; and in every such Case the Superintendent Registrar before whom the said Declaration is made shall sign the Entry of Birth as well as the registrar, and for every such Registry as last aforesaid the Superintendent Registrar shall be entitled to have a Fee of Two Shillings and Sixpence from the Person requiring the same to be registered ; and the Registrar, over and above the Fee herein-after enacted in respect of every birth registered by him, shall be entitled, unless the Delay shall have been occasioned by his Default, to have a Fee of Five Shillings from the person requiring the same to be registered ; and no Register of Births shall be given in Evidence to prove the Birth of any Child wherein it shall appear that Forty-two Days have intervened between the Day of the Birth and the Day of the Registration of the Birth of such Child, unless the Entry shall be signed by the Superintendent Registrar ; and every person who shall knowingly register or cause to be registered the Birth of any Child, otherwise than herein-before is last mentioned, after the Expiration of Forty-two Days following the Day of Birth of such Child, shall forfeit and pay for every such Offence a Sum not exceeding Fifty Pounds. XXIII. And be it enacted, That after the Expiration of Six Calendar Months following the Birth of any Child it shall not be lawful for any Registrar to register the Birth of such Child, and no Register of Births, except in the Case of Children born at Sea, shall be given in Evidence to prove the Birth of any Child wherein it shall appear that Six Calendar Months have intervened between the Day of the Birth and the Day of the Registration of the Birth of such Child ; and every Person who shall knowingly register or cause to be registered the Birth of any Child after the Expiration of Six Calendar Months following the Day of the Birth of such Child shall forfeit and pay for every such Offence a Sum not exceeding Fifty Pounds. -- John Lewis Debian & the GeneWeb genealogical data server