Yes Jon of course he would have been rounded off to 5 I wonder what they have in 1851, I had no response for my lookup request. This family seemed to move between Sussex and Surrey quite often. Bob Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "J P NIXEY" <jpnixey@btinternet.com> To: <ENG-HAMPSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 4:05 PM Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Certificates > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <bob.newell@ntlworld.com> > To: <ENG-HAMPSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 3:42 PM > Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Certificates > > he is listed as Stephen in the 1841 but even then the age was wrong by 2 > years. > > > Hi Bob, don't forget the 1841 was a mish-mash for ages being rounded up or > down. When I've compared my family's aages in 1841 and 1851, it was almost > hard to believe they were the same family. > > regards, Jon > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.13/78 - Release Date: 8/19/05 > > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx >