Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 12:20:47 +0100 > Charani <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Charani, > > >>John, Elizabeth, Eliza, George, Harry, Richard, William and Jane. > > > In '51 they have; John, Elizabeth, Eliza & George. > > In '71 there are; George, Harry, Richard, William and Jane. Richard > snr is listed as widower. > > FreeBMD has; > > Mar 1865 (>99%) > COLE Jane Lymington 2b 44_ > > and > > Mar 1866 (>99%) > COLE Jane 42 Lymington 2b 390 > > as possible deaths. Given that Jane (dau) is listed as 5 yrs old, and > the AaD matches, I think that the latter is probably the right one. I > couldn't find a likely match for birth registration of the daughter. Many thanks. That accounts for why I couldn't find Richard and Jane in the 1881, only Richard jnr. Richard snr seems to have shuffled off by then as well. No, I can't find a good match for Jane jnr either. There's one at Ringwood which may or may not be her. I do have her date of birth though because she's my great grandmother :)) -- Charani (UK)