Sorry if you have already seen this, but their is a petition going to no 10 asking for the BMD records 1837-1908 to be made open access. Details and sign up at http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/OpenBMDrecords/ Sandra _______________________________________ No viruses found in this outgoing message Scanned by iolo AntiVirus 1.5.6.3 http://www.iolo.com

I use a good spam filter, and you probably do the same. I have whitelisted you and that means that I will receive all the emails you send to me. I would appreciate it if you would whitelist my email address: dorothy@crowshaw.wanadoo.co.uk in your spam filter. If you don't have a spam filter, I can recommend SPAMfighter. It is a highly effective free spam filter for Outlook and Outlook Express. You can get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/Pro I hope that you will whitelist me, so we can continue to communicate safely via email in the future. Best regards Dorothy Crowshaw

Many thanx Brad Will give it a try. Everyone on this site is SO helpful. Marion ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brad Rogers" <brad@fineby.me.uk> To: <eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 9:02 AM Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Sidbury, Devon mailing list > On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:50:57 +1100 > "Marion Haynes" <ol56365@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > > Hello Marion, > >> Can anyone help with an address for Sidbury, Devon, similar to this >> one. Have been unable to find one as good as this . Any help would be >> appreciated > > <DEVON@rootsweb.com> is well populated, and has knowledgeable people in > it. > > -- > Regards _ > / ) "The blindingly obvious is > / _)rad never immediately apparent" > > Why do they try to hide our past pulling down houses and build car parks > Bricks & Mortar - The Jam > > ............................................. > Want to contact the local community? > Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings > http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk > ............................................. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Good morning. Can anyone help with an address for Sidbury, Devon, similar to this one. Have been unable to find one as good as this . Any help would be appreciated Thanks Marion Melbourne Australia

Hi Chris How about Drocheneford which is the earlier spelling of Droxford according to the 'Old Hampshire Mapped' website. http://www.envf.port.ac.uk/hantsgaz/hantsgaz/HGANDX_F.HTM Kate -----Original Message----- From: eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Chris & Caroline Sent: 05 February 2009 23:53 To: Hampshire Life; eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com Subject: [ENG-HANTS] Druncheaunts A friend iisn the middle of transcribing a manuscript on the family of Jane Austen. Can you confirm, or correct one unusual name in the following list: 'Lord of the Manors of Chawton, Faringdon, Alton, Eastbrook, Druncheaunts(???) and Neatham' Thanks Chris SOUTHERN LIFE(UK) History of the villages of Hampshire, Dorset and the Isle of Wight http://southernlife.org.uk ............................................. Want to contact the local community? Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk ............................................. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

A friend iisn the middle of transcribing a manuscript on the family of Jane Austen. Can you confirm, or correct one unusual name in the following list: 'Lord of the Manors of Chawton, Faringdon, Alton, Eastbrook, Druncheaunts(???) and Neatham' Thanks Chris SOUTHERN LIFE(UK) History of the villages of Hampshire, Dorset and the Isle of Wight http://southernlife.org.uk

On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:57:34 +1100 "Marion Haynes" <ol56365@bigpond.net.au> wrote: Hello Marion, > Many thanx Brad You're welcome. > Will give it a try. Everyone on this site is SO helpful We aim to please. :-) -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" I'll be the rubbish you'll be the bin Love Song - The Damned

On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:50:57 +1100 "Marion Haynes" <ol56365@bigpond.net.au> wrote: Hello Marion, > Can anyone help with an address for Sidbury, Devon, similar to this > one. Have been unable to find one as good as this . Any help would be > appreciated <DEVON@rootsweb.com> is well populated, and has knowledgeable people in it. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" Why do they try to hide our past pulling down houses and build car parks Bricks & Mortar - The Jam

If you are looking for family members who left England to live in Canada, the Canadian Government has placed the entire 1851, 1871, 1881, 1891, 1901, 1911 census online in searchable databases and it's free. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/census/index-e.html Regards Ed Barbour

Thank you to all the people who replied to my query re the above. I do have a copy of my own so can do look ups but it was for someone else who wanted to buy one. I will pass on all the information you have given me. Jean _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail, Messenger, Photos and more - all with the new Windows Live. Get started! http://www.download.live.com/

Hi! Brad, There is Sidbury, Shropshire, England. Dianne> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:02:58 +0000> From: brad@fineby.me.uk> To: eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com> Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Sidbury, Devon mailing list> > On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:50:57 +1100> "Marion Haynes" <ol56365@bigpond.net.au> wrote:> > Hello Marion,> > > Can anyone help with an address for Sidbury, Devon, similar to this> > one. Have been unable to find one as good as this . Any help would be> > appreciated> > <DEVON@rootsweb.com> is well populated, and has knowledgeable people in> it.> > -- > Regards _> / ) "The blindingly obvious is> / _)rad never immediately apparent"> > Why do they try to hide our past pulling down houses and build car parks> Bricks & Mortar - The Jam> > .............................................> Want to contact the local community?> Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings> http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk> .............................................> > -------------------------------> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Twice the fun—Share photos while you chat with Windows Live Messenger. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx

Hi Ed Thanks for this suggestion, but this doesn't happen on my PC - I just get the list address. Perhaps I've got something set differently from you. It's not a problem, because I can use the other method - as long as I remember to do something different from all the other lists I belong to. Kate -----Original Message----- From: eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Ed Barbour Sent: 04 February 2009 22:37 To: eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Handy tip You can also click on "reply all" and then delete the maillist address. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kate Burhouse" <k.burhouse@btinternet.com> To: <eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com>; "'A. Day'" <ann.day@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:06 AM Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Handy tip > Thank you Ann. It's hard to remember to do that when I'm used to just > clicking <Reply> on other groups. > > -----Original Message----- > From: eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of A. Day > Sent: 04 February 2009 09:21 > To: eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Handy tip > > Click on the name on the top right of the email > Ann > > Kate Burhouse wrote: >> Hi Chris >> >> Could you explain how I can reply off list - when I click either <Reply> > or >> <Reply To All> I just get the list address. There have been a few times > I've >> wanted to reply off list and not been able to on this list. Others I > belong >> to are set up differently so that clicking <Reply> just uses the actual >> person's email address. >> >> Thanks >> >> Kate >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com >> [mailto:eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Chris & Caroline >> Sent: 03 February 2009 14:08 >> To: eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com >> Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Handy tip >> >> Only if you want Spyware on your csomputer Kate. >> All toolbars are prone to this and my way is just one little icon. >> All over comments please reply off list >> Chris >> >> >> >> ............................................. >> Want to contact the local community? >> Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings >> http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk >> ............................................. >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> > > > ............................................. > Want to contact the local community? > Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings > http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk > ............................................. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ............................................. > Want to contact the local community? > Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings > http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk > ............................................. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ............................................. Want to contact the local community? Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk ............................................. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

You can also click on "reply all" and then delete the maillist address. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kate Burhouse" <k.burhouse@btinternet.com> To: <eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com>; "'A. Day'" <ann.day@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:06 AM Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Handy tip > Thank you Ann. It's hard to remember to do that when I'm used to just > clicking <Reply> on other groups. > > -----Original Message----- > From: eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of A. Day > Sent: 04 February 2009 09:21 > To: eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Handy tip > > Click on the name on the top right of the email > Ann > > Kate Burhouse wrote: >> Hi Chris >> >> Could you explain how I can reply off list - when I click either <Reply> > or >> <Reply To All> I just get the list address. There have been a few times > I've >> wanted to reply off list and not been able to on this list. Others I > belong >> to are set up differently so that clicking <Reply> just uses the actual >> person's email address. >> >> Thanks >> >> Kate >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com >> [mailto:eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Chris & Caroline >> Sent: 03 February 2009 14:08 >> To: eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com >> Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Handy tip >> >> Only if you want Spyware on your csomputer Kate. >> All toolbars are prone to this and my way is just one little icon. >> All over comments please reply off list >> Chris >> >> >> >> ............................................. >> Want to contact the local community? >> Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings >> http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk >> ............................................. >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> > > > ............................................. > Want to contact the local community? > Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings > http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk > ............................................. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ............................................. > Want to contact the local community? > Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings > http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk > ............................................. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

On Wednesday 04 February 2009 16:57:06 editor@pyroport.com wrote: > I think you need to make the distinction between malicious spyware, say a > trojan that gathers data and returns it to a company who then sell it on > and software like Google's toolbar which by definition is spyware however > it is far from malicious I thought I had made that distinction, however if it wasn't clear enough then I apologise. I'd be more cautious about throwing in Trojans with spyware, they are similar but distinct categories of applications. I'm willing to acknowledge that there are two ends to the spectrum, from the out and out criminals through to the Googles of the world, who aren't quite whiter than white, but enjoy the lighter shades of grey. Whether any firms intentions can be so easily defined as malicious or not is fairly subjective. What sets apart a firm that merely sells on the data gathered to advertisers from Google who collect the data for their own advertising? Whether you consider the actions to be malicious depends entirely on your perspective - do you trust Google with that information? Is the difference that at least you know _where_ that information is going? Ultimately these are the questions that really matter and if you accept the terms by which the Google and their toolbar operate, then go ahead and use it. All I have tried to do is allow people to make up their own minds, to make informed decisions. On the flipside I'm sure there is much to recommend about Google toolbar or the other Google products. If you'd like an alternative to Google Toolbar, then Firefox or Opera are worth checking out. They do many of the same things, in particular the one which sparked this whole topic, the inline searching and highlighting of search terms. Both browser also have the advantage of being less frequent victims of exploits than IE, though don't be lulled into a false sense of security. I think I've said all I have to say on this subject and I can be quite certain that many list users are sick of the OT chat already, so I'll resist from further replies. -- Stuart Morgan

I think you need to make the distinction between malicious spyware, say a trojan that gathers data and returns it to a company who then sell it on and software like Google's toolbar which by definition is spyware however it is far from malicious On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:46:40 +0000, Stuart Morgan <stuart@tase.co.uk> wrote: > On Wednesday 04 February 2009 13:43:47 Steve Frost wrote: >> I'm sorry but that is absolute total uninformed codswallop. > > Sigh. > >> Pagerank is not spyware, pagerank is a part of the agorithm that Google >> use to rank web page. >> >> The pagerank feature of Google toolbar merely displays the pagerank of >> the current page. > > When page rank display is enabled in Google Toolbar it contacts the server > with your IP address and the URL of the page to establish the ranking. This > > information is stored by Google alongside the other data they collect > linking > the IP address to searches etc. Would you dispute this? > >> Also by definition, if it's a documented feature and it can be disabled, >> it's not spyware. > > That's what the definition has evolved to become, it's not the original > definition by any means. The original usage from the late 90s refered to > any > software or hardware which automatically 'phoned home' information about > your > computer, your computer usage or your web browsing habits. Following an > uproar > from users of such products many firms ceased the behaviour, some asked > explicit permission to obtain this information whilst the rest continued as > > before but tried to hide the behaviour from the end user. It was this last > group that has effectively redefined the wider understanding of what is > meant > by Spyware. Those larger firms still collecting this information, such as > Google, have also tried to redefine the term to distance themselves from > the > attached bad press. > > Collecting such personal information such as browsing habits is still > deeply > unpopular with people if they are aware it is happening. With all that your > > internet usage can say about you: your hobbies and interests; what you buy > (online); who you work for; what you read; your political affiliations; > which > banks you have accounts with and more intimate details (if you catch my > drift). > > Should evidence of this be needed, look to Phorm, an organisation which > last > year signed a deal with major UK ISPs including BT and Virgin Media to > track > your browsing habits. It caused a major storm with questions in Parliament, > > Police investigations into violations of Privacy and Data Protection laws > and > users besieging their ISPs with complaints resulting in a climbdown. People > > were aghast at the idea this information would be collected, even though > Phorms system would have stripped the data of all identifying information > including IP addresses. The irony is that Google et al have been collecting > > exactly this information, without stripping IP address for years, and > continue > to retain every last bit of it in vast digital archives. > > More recently they have begun to make this data available to governments on > > request. Most disturbingly in China where it lead to the arrest of citizens > > showing interest in democracy and other banned topics in their Google > searches, page views and forum postings. > > Now I should be interested to know what, if anything of the above, is not > accurate (or absolute total uninformed codswallop). > -- > Stuart Morgan > > ............................................. > Want to contact the local community? > Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings > http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk > ............................................. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

On Wednesday 04 February 2009 13:43:47 Steve Frost wrote: > I'm sorry but that is absolute total uninformed codswallop. Sigh. > Pagerank is not spyware, pagerank is a part of the agorithm that Google > use to rank web page. > > The pagerank feature of Google toolbar merely displays the pagerank of > the current page. When page rank display is enabled in Google Toolbar it contacts the server with your IP address and the URL of the page to establish the ranking. This information is stored by Google alongside the other data they collect linking the IP address to searches etc. Would you dispute this? > Also by definition, if it's a documented feature and it can be disabled, > it's not spyware. That's what the definition has evolved to become, it's not the original definition by any means. The original usage from the late 90s refered to any software or hardware which automatically 'phoned home' information about your computer, your computer usage or your web browsing habits. Following an uproar from users of such products many firms ceased the behaviour, some asked explicit permission to obtain this information whilst the rest continued as before but tried to hide the behaviour from the end user. It was this last group that has effectively redefined the wider understanding of what is meant by Spyware. Those larger firms still collecting this information, such as Google, have also tried to redefine the term to distance themselves from the attached bad press. Collecting such personal information such as browsing habits is still deeply unpopular with people if they are aware it is happening. With all that your internet usage can say about you: your hobbies and interests; what you buy (online); who you work for; what you read; your political affiliations; which banks you have accounts with and more intimate details (if you catch my drift). Should evidence of this be needed, look to Phorm, an organisation which last year signed a deal with major UK ISPs including BT and Virgin Media to track your browsing habits. It caused a major storm with questions in Parliament, Police investigations into violations of Privacy and Data Protection laws and users besieging their ISPs with complaints resulting in a climbdown. People were aghast at the idea this information would be collected, even though Phorms system would have stripped the data of all identifying information including IP addresses. The irony is that Google et al have been collecting exactly this information, without stripping IP address for years, and continue to retain every last bit of it in vast digital archives. More recently they have begun to make this data available to governments on request. Most disturbingly in China where it lead to the arrest of citizens showing interest in democracy and other banned topics in their Google searches, page views and forum postings. Now I should be interested to know what, if anything of the above, is not accurate (or absolute total uninformed codswallop). -- Stuart Morgan

I think what Stuart's getting at is that if you are concerned about privacy then you need to be aware of what the toolbar will do (track browsing habits and send to google) if you don't disable it. You can always use Firefox if this does bother you, despite what some people say it is generally more stable and secure than IE, plus the search box in the top right provides the functionality of the google toolbar without all the other features. Tony On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:43:47 +0000, Steve Frost <frost.steve@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > I'm sorry but that is absolute total uninformed codswallop. > > Google toolbar is 100% spyware free, period. > > Pagerank is not spyware, pagerank is a part of the agorithm that Google > use to rank web page. > > The pagerank feature of Google toolbar merely displays the pagerank of > the current page. > > Also by definition, if it's a documented feature and it can be disabled, > it's not spyware. > > Steve > > Stuart Morgan wrote: >> On Wednesday 04 February 2009 08:34:45 Steve Frost wrote: >> >>> Hi Chris >>> >>> Google toolbar is 100% spyware free. >>> >> >> Sorry to go off topic folks, but I feel I should correct that impression >> so >> that people can make informed choices. >> >> Google toolbar is spyware if certain advanced features are enabled. It >> reports >> every page you view to Google in order to build up a profile of your >> interests >> for targeted advertising - the very definition of spyware. This 'feature' >> >> called PageRank can be disabled in the settings. >> >> Google has to make money somehow, they wouldn't pay programmers to create >> >> their toolbar software and distribute it free of charge unless there was >> something in it for them. Googles income comes from targeted advertising >> and >> to those ends they are collecting information about you in whatever ways >> they >> can. This includes through your searches, through websites hosting Google >> >> adverts or hit counters, through reading your email in Google Mail, >> through >> Google toolbar, the documents you view or create in their new 'Office' >> software or their new Chrome web browser. Their whole business model is >> built >> upon spying and spyware. >> >> If you feel you can trust Google and the governments to which they impart >> this >> information upon request, then none of this should matter. >> > > > ............................................. > Want to contact the local community? > Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings > http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk > ............................................. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

I'm sorry but that is absolute total uninformed codswallop. Google toolbar is 100% spyware free, period. Pagerank is not spyware, pagerank is a part of the agorithm that Google use to rank web page. The pagerank feature of Google toolbar merely displays the pagerank of the current page. Also by definition, if it's a documented feature and it can be disabled, it's not spyware. Steve Stuart Morgan wrote: > On Wednesday 04 February 2009 08:34:45 Steve Frost wrote: > >> Hi Chris >> >> Google toolbar is 100% spyware free. >> > > Sorry to go off topic folks, but I feel I should correct that impression so > that people can make informed choices. > > Google toolbar is spyware if certain advanced features are enabled. It reports > every page you view to Google in order to build up a profile of your interests > for targeted advertising - the very definition of spyware. This 'feature' > called PageRank can be disabled in the settings. > > Google has to make money somehow, they wouldn't pay programmers to create > their toolbar software and distribute it free of charge unless there was > something in it for them. Googles income comes from targeted advertising and > to those ends they are collecting information about you in whatever ways they > can. This includes through your searches, through websites hosting Google > adverts or hit counters, through reading your email in Google Mail, through > Google toolbar, the documents you view or create in their new 'Office' > software or their new Chrome web browser. Their whole business model is built > upon spying and spyware. > > If you feel you can trust Google and the governments to which they impart this > information upon request, then none of this should matter. >

On Wednesday 04 February 2009 08:34:45 Steve Frost wrote: > Hi Chris > > Google toolbar is 100% spyware free. Sorry to go off topic folks, but I feel I should correct that impression so that people can make informed choices. Google toolbar is spyware if certain advanced features are enabled. It reports every page you view to Google in order to build up a profile of your interests for targeted advertising - the very definition of spyware. This 'feature' called PageRank can be disabled in the settings. Google has to make money somehow, they wouldn't pay programmers to create their toolbar software and distribute it free of charge unless there was something in it for them. Googles income comes from targeted advertising and to those ends they are collecting information about you in whatever ways they can. This includes through your searches, through websites hosting Google adverts or hit counters, through reading your email in Google Mail, through Google toolbar, the documents you view or create in their new 'Office' software or their new Chrome web browser. Their whole business model is built upon spying and spyware. If you feel you can trust Google and the governments to which they impart this information upon request, then none of this should matter. -- Stuart Morgan

Thank you Ann. It's hard to remember to do that when I'm used to just clicking <Reply> on other groups. -----Original Message----- From: eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of A. Day Sent: 04 February 2009 09:21 To: eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Handy tip Click on the name on the top right of the email Ann Kate Burhouse wrote: > Hi Chris > > Could you explain how I can reply off list - when I click either <Reply> or > <Reply To All> I just get the list address. There have been a few times I've > wanted to reply off list and not been able to on this list. Others I belong > to are set up differently so that clicking <Reply> just uses the actual > person's email address. > > Thanks > > Kate > > -----Original Message----- > From: eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:eng-hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Chris & Caroline > Sent: 03 February 2009 14:08 > To: eng-hampshire@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ENG-HANTS] Handy tip > > Only if you want Spyware on your csomputer Kate. > All toolbars are prone to this and my way is just one little icon. > All over comments please reply off list > Chris > > > > ............................................. > Want to contact the local community? > Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings > http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk > ............................................. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ............................................. Want to contact the local community? Please visit Hampshire Parish Jottings http://hants.parishjottings.org.uk ............................................. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-HAMPSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message