Hello again, Bob, You say "none of them are related" Don't forget that Jane Hale and Sarah Hale are probably sisters even if married in different places! Sally -----Original Message----- From: bob.newell@ntlworld.com [mailto:bob.newell@ntlworld.com] Sent: 23 May 2005 21:04 To: ENG-HAM-PORTSMOUTH-GOSPORT-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [PORTSMOUTH-GOSPORT] Problem Thank you Jon Brilliant that clears up my problem and tells me that none of them are related Ha! Ha! Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "J P NIXEY" <jpnixey@btinternet.com> To: <ENG-HAM-PORTSMOUTH-GOSPORT-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 8:51 PM Subject: Re: [PORTSMOUTH-GOSPORT] Problem > Bob, I hope this may be of help: > > from www.familysearch.org > > Jane Hale married Charles Love hollis, Aug 15, 1865, at Saint Thomas, > Portsea > > Sarah Hale married Henry Newall, Nov 17, 1875, at Saint Faith, Havant > > > Regards, Jon > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.15 - Release Date: 5/22/05 > > > ==== ENG-HAM-PORTSMOUTH-GOSPORT Mailing List ==== > Visit the knightroots website at www.knightroots.co.uk > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > ==== ENG-HAM-PORTSMOUTH-GOSPORT Mailing List ==== Don't go barking up the wrong tree be like a good chef and ALWAYS check your SOURCES ============================== Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.11.10 - Release Date: 13/05/2005 -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.11.10 - Release Date: 13/05/2005