Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. [HWK] Charles BLEAKEN
    2. Robert Millard
    3. Hi Bernice I think the area around Toronto especialy the south west was very popular with Hawkesbury folk I have traced a number of STINCHCOMBE's there but one early family predates the 1841 census of England so is a bit difficult, there must have been a shipping company that "dropped off" close by was this farming country or industrial? And as for them WATTS'es they get every where. regards Robert Visit my web pages at http://www.hawkesburyhistory.co.uk ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Ostrander" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 3:43 PM Subject: [HWK] Re: Charles BLEAKEN > There was a BLEAKEN family came to Canada with my ggrandfather,Thomas Amos > WATTS, who settled in Toronto. About 45yrs ago I remember visiting > Nedrie(BLEAKENbut I don't remember her married name. Also one time we > visited ST MARY'S the people that signed the guest book were BLEAKENS from > Oakville or Burlington. Bernice(WATTS)OSTRANDER > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Teagle" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 5:39 AM > Subject: [HWK] Charles BLEAKEN > > > > > > Whilst copying an entry from the 1901 census for Toronto, Canada for a > > relation of mine, Lewis TEAGLE, originally from Oldbury-on-the-Hill, who > > emigrated to Canada in 1882, and lived at 26 Irwin Ave, Toronto in 1901, I > > noticed that the head of household of the family immediately underneath > was > > a Charles BLEAKEN, 57, wid, born England on 11 March 1844, year of entry > to > > Canada 1882. His daughter Annie, 20, was also born England (29 March 1881) > > and entered Canada 1882. (There were two later sons aged 13 born Ontario, > > Albert born 2 May? 1887, and Frank born 16 Feb? 1886 (months difficult to > > read). Could Charles BLEAKEN be from Hawkesbury - families emigrating at > the > > same time often seem to have stayed together. > > > > My Dad had BLEAKEN cousins in Hawkesbury (descended fro Giles Beard > > Bleaken), and I know there was a Charles BLEAKEN born 1844 (married Emma > > MANNING, 1866, Hawkesbury)living on Inglestone Common in 1881, with an > > unnamed infant daughter aged 6 days. Does anyone know if this Charles > > BLEAKEN stayed in Hawkesbury, or could he be the one in Toronto in 1901? > > > > PS. If this is of interest to any BLEAKEN researchers who want to view > this > > entry on the orininal 1901 Toronto census page on the web (it's free > unlike > > the England 1901 census, but not name indexed)I have a note of the > relevant > > reference/schedule/page no. > > > > Richard Teagle > > Email: [email protected] > > > > > > ==== ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY Mailing List ==== > > When replying to messages please make sure to remove ALL the "Re: and > Hawks" bits in the subject line as otherwise these will be repeated. > > > > ============================== > > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration > > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more. > > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237 > > > > > > > > ==== ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY Mailing List ==== > When replying to messages please make sure to remove ALL the "Re: and Hawks" bits in the subject line as otherwise these will be repeated. > > ============================== > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more. > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237

    02/06/2004 12:30:49