Dear Linda, I think that David Wicks in Birmingham has this couple fit onto his family tree. He is very prompt with his responses so I will forward your message to him (since he's not a lister) and I'm sure that either you or I will hear back within 24 hrs. Ronda -----Original Message----- From: Linda Barraclough <kapana@netspace.net.au> To: ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY-L@rootsweb.com <ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Monday, July 17, 2000 6:08 AM Subject: [[Hawks]] WICKS and HALE (nearly had a conniption!!!!) >Just catching up on my reading (knocking down walls in house) and nearly had >a conniption when I saw this one from that grave recording team: >> >>and one from Cromhall >> >>Thomas WICKS died Nov 11 1850 aged 84 Sarah his wife died July 31st 1841 >>aged 73 > >Then I looked and found my missing ones are Stephen WICKS and Sarah HABLE, >and this pair is one generation too far back. And I don't know where my >WICKS came from, apart from a suspicion of Kingswood. But has anyone claimed >this couple, so we can have mutually satisfying discussions??? > >Thanks to all the transcribers - at least I know now mine aren't there. > >Linda >Victoria, Australia > >PS Did I see something about a new HALE researcher on the list? I have a >Jane HALE, of unknown parentage, married Thomas VAISEY at an unknown date >and had her first child at Kingswood in 1800. Any chance ??????? > > >==== ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY Mailing List ==== >Please remember when you post messages that SURNAMES should be in CAPITALS. Penalty for non-compliance is a Pond Dipping. > >============================== >Search ALL of RootsWeb's mailing lists in real time. >RootsWeb's Personalized Mailing Lists: >http://pml.rootsweb.com/ > >