I am TERRY CHAPPELL and the great grandson of JOSEPH STINCHCOMBE, he of the STINCHCOMBE family band photo 1901. Would appreciate any information on his ancestors, to add to or confirm my own research to date. Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself with cool emoticons - download MSN Messenger today! http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

Hi Eric Thanks for the info, Dave HEDGES told me about someone on the Hillesley village site who mentioned he had a postcard, and on the front was a picture of the 1905 Hawkesbury triplets, My grandmother being one of them I contacted him he sent me a copy, I was naturally curious as to who had sent it originaly and hence I received the text and a note saying I doubt these are connected in anyway, he also said that the recipient was his grandmother, having worked out who the sender and recipient was I asked if he knew you, turns out he is or has been in contact with you. In December I was in the Beaufort telling this story to Robert LEE from Canada who was visiting when a couple on the next table heard me mention COOK they told me their son was researching the COOK's turned out to be your Mum and Dad. small world or are you famous? regards Robert Visit my web pages at http://www.hawkesburyhistory.co.uk ----- Original Message ----- From: "ericwhitlock" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 12:25 AM Subject: FW: [HWK]FRANKCOMBE and PUGSLEY postcard > > Hi Robert et all > > I am just sending this again because iI did not get areply so I thought > there may have been a server problem. Just in case I have sent it through > the main list rather than straight to you. In any case other listers might > find the information on my great PUGSLEY interesting. > > Diolch > > Eric > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ericwhitlock [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 12 October 2003 15:30 > To: Robert Millard > Subject: RE: [HWK] Get together and postcard > > > > Robert > > I can help with this one. MF is Mary Rose Ellen FRANKCOMBE (nee COOK) born > 1865 wife of John FRANKCOMBE. Mary's sister Edith Grace PUGSLEY(Nee COOK) > born 1867 had a guest house in porlock weir at the address you mention. > These to ladies were the sisters of Enoch COOK my Great Grandfather born > 24/7/1871. Their parents were Enoch Cook and Edith Grace Butler married at > Hillsley 13/10/1861. I have several pictures of Robert Pugsley and Edith > Grace as well as a postcard of their Guest house in Porlock. If the person > who contacted you wants more information they can e mail me or ring me on > 01495 753987. > > Diolch > > Eric Whitlock > > (Sorry I have not checked the mail from this list for several months due to > Back Problems) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Millard [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 16 October 2003 14:08 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [HWK] Get together and postcard > > > Hi all > Just a reminder that we have a get together Sat 1st November at the Beaufort > fingers crossed we may meet Jenny JOYCE from OZ if she can make it. > I have been sent a postcard with the CORNOCK triplets on it (one of them > Ella was my gran who passed over in March would have been 98 tomorrow) on > the reverse is a note from "M F" I think she is the sister of Mrs R PUGSLEY > of Lane end, Porlock Wier, Somerset it was posted 25 May 1906 in > Leighterton, the "R" is probably her husbands initial. does this link to > anyone I would imagine the card was bought in Hawkesbury or Hillesley. > regards > Robert > Visit my web pages at http://www.btinternet.com/~ra.millard/index.htm > > > ==== ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY Mailing List ==== > When replying to messages please make sure to remove ALL the "Re: and Hawks" > bits in the subject line as otherwise these will be repeated. > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go > to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > > > Message has been scanned by Webshield > > > > > > Message has been scanned by Webshield > > > > > ==== ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY Mailing List ==== > When replying to messages please make sure to remove ALL the "Re: and Hawks" bits in the subject line as otherwise these will be repeated. > > ============================== > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more. > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237 > > >

Hi Robert et all I am just sending this again because iI did not get areply so I thought there may have been a server problem. Just in case I have sent it through the main list rather than straight to you. In any case other listers might find the information on my great PUGSLEY interesting. Diolch Eric -----Original Message----- From: ericwhitlock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 12 October 2003 15:30 To: Robert Millard Subject: RE: [HWK] Get together and postcard Robert I can help with this one. MF is Mary Rose Ellen FRANKCOMBE (nee COOK) born 1865 wife of John FRANKCOMBE. Mary's sister Edith Grace PUGSLEY(Nee COOK) born 1867 had a guest house in porlock weir at the address you mention. These to ladies were the sisters of Enoch COOK my Great Grandfather born 24/7/1871. Their parents were Enoch Cook and Edith Grace Butler married at Hillsley 13/10/1861. I have several pictures of Robert Pugsley and Edith Grace as well as a postcard of their Guest house in Porlock. If the person who contacted you wants more information they can e mail me or ring me on 01495 753987. Diolch Eric Whitlock (Sorry I have not checked the mail from this list for several months due to Back Problems) -----Original Message----- From: Robert Millard [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 16 October 2003 14:08 To: [email protected] Subject: [HWK] Get together and postcard Hi all Just a reminder that we have a get together Sat 1st November at the Beaufort fingers crossed we may meet Jenny JOYCE from OZ if she can make it. I have been sent a postcard with the CORNOCK triplets on it (one of them Ella was my gran who passed over in March would have been 98 tomorrow) on the reverse is a note from "M F" I think she is the sister of Mrs R PUGSLEY of Lane end, Porlock Wier, Somerset it was posted 25 May 1906 in Leighterton, the "R" is probably her husbands initial. does this link to anyone I would imagine the card was bought in Hawkesbury or Hillesley. regards Robert Visit my web pages at http://www.btinternet.com/~ra.millard/index.htm ==== ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY Mailing List ==== When replying to messages please make sure to remove ALL the "Re: and Hawks" bits in the subject line as otherwise these will be repeated. ============================== To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 Message has been scanned by Webshield Message has been scanned by Webshield

Hello Jane Can't help you with this one - sorry. I don't have any Frances WATTS that would fit the dates. If you do track them down please let e know. Best wishes Carole ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harold&Jane" <Harold&[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 1:16 AM Subject: [HWK] TILLING AND WATTS MARRIAGE 1803 > Dear List, > I was going through my unproven relationship BRIGGS and TILLING files in > preparation to putting them on Family Treemaker and I came across this. > > Marriage Record for George Tilling > Name Tilling George > Spouse Frances Watts > Location of Event: Middlesex, Eng > Parish: Teddinton > Date; 22 Feb.1803 Source Roots web Database United Kingdom and Ireland > Records > I searched my Vital Records Index and looked at Roots web BMD but didn't > find it. I found a lot of Frances WATTS, one from Wiltshire a distinct > possibility whether they were just married in Middlesex or lived there. > They could be the Thomas TILLING family that left Gloucester > c1800>Middlesex>Surrey. George is a popular surname in my TILLINGS. > I have been following with interest your Emails, but couldn't save them as I > have a feeling my mountain of information is becoming volcanic and will > erupt and corrupt my files and disrupt my computer soon. > Many Regards Jane, > > harold&[email protected] >

Hello everyone, Jane GINGELLwas born abt 1823 in Hawkesbury Upton and married the widower, William WATTS of Great Badminton Dec 16 1849 at Hawkesbury. On the 1861 census William & Jane WATTS and family are at Withy Moor, Gt Badminton; With them is Elizabeth GINGELL, Visitor, Unmarried 17 born Hawkesbury. Are Jane & Elizabeth GINGELL sisters and who were their parents please? Thanks Carole

Dear List, I was going through my unproven relationship BRIGGS and TILLING files in preparation to putting them on Family Treemaker and I came across this. Marriage Record for George Tilling Name Tilling George Spouse Frances Watts Location of Event: Middlesex, Eng Parish: Teddinton Date; 22 Feb.1803 Source Roots web Database United Kingdom and Ireland Records I searched my Vital Records Index and looked at Roots web BMD but didn't find it. I found a lot of Frances WATTS, one from Wiltshire a distinct possibility whether they were just married in Middlesex or lived there. They could be the Thomas TILLING family that left Gloucester c1800>Middlesex>Surrey. George is a popular surname in my TILLINGS. I have been following with interest your Emails, but couldn't save them as I have a feeling my mountain of information is becoming volcanic and will erupt and corrupt my files and disrupt my computer soon. Many Regards Jane, harold&[email protected]

Hi Carole The 1871 census ref is RG 10 2581 3B Hawkesbury : Hillesley, Tresham, Saddlewood, Killcott.................etc Page 13 Lower Kilcott item 62 John WATTS, Head, Widr, age 49, Ag Lab, born Hawkesbury Upton Sarah ( then a squiggle like an S but which I think must be a J) Ditto, Daur, Unmar, age 16, Servant General, Ditto Walter Ditto, Son, - , age 9, Scholar, Ditto I feel guilty now that I didn't transcribe a bigger chunk of the tape. It was very near the beginning and I had a stack of tricky stuff to look for in Somerset, so I moved on very rapidly, but my memory is that there were a whole lot of other WATTS in Lower Kilcott. The entry means that Hannah WATTS nee PAINTER must have died between Dec qu 1861 and 1871, but I had no time for more than a quick check for the first 2 quarters to see if she had died in childbirth. ( no result). I'll let you know if I locate Walter after 1881. Cheers Liz On Friday, January 23, 2004, at 10:22 PM, anthony sharp wrote: > Hi Liz > Brilliant, another WATTS for the collection!. Could you let me have the > complete 1871 census entry please? > > On the 1881 census there are 3 Walter WATTS of about the same age in > the > Hawkesbury area and I can account for the other two. So I guess the > Horfield > one is yours. > > Please let me know if you find out any more about this family. > > Best wishes > Carole > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David & Liz Fisher" <[email protected]> > To: "anthony sharp" <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 3:06 PM > Subject: Yet more WATTS > > >> Hi Carole and every one, >> >> Firstly, I've had a great time going through the Hawkesbury CD >> produced >> last summer. Thanks to all concerned. Like Carole, I arrived seeking >> the roots of one WATTS family member and found more than I could have >> dreamed of, not least the friendly support and interest of other list >> members. >> >> I have been listening in to the recent WATTS conversations and after a >> trawl thro the 1871 census in the Family Record Centre yesterday now >> have one more WATTS to add to Carole's bulging file. >> >> My greatgrandmother Sarah Jane WATTS (1854 - 1949) was the daughter of >> John WATTS (1821-1900) who was in turn son of John WATTS (1791 - >> 1881), >> the butcher from Upton, and Jane Pritchard. This line seems strong on >> longevity! >> >> The new WATTS is a brother Walter for Sarah Jane, shown in 1871 age 9 >> living in Lower Kilcott with his widowed father John and sister, GRO >> confirms the birth as Walter WATTS, Dec qu 1861 Chipping Sodbury 6a >> 158. >> >> There is an 1881 entry for a private in the Horfield barracks, which I >> think must be him although the ages and dates dont tally perfectly - >> unless any one knows better of course. They give a Walter WATTS , born >> 1863 in Hawkesbury, age 18. I've found nothing so far on the 1901 >> census. >> >> If anyone knows anything about him I'd be interested to hear from them >> >> Liz >> > >

Hi Liz Brilliant, another WATTS for the collection!. Could you let me have the complete 1871 census entry please? On the 1881 census there are 3 Walter WATTS of about the same age in the Hawkesbury area and I can account for the other two. So I guess the Horfield one is yours. Please let me know if you find out any more about this family. Best wishes Carole ----- Original Message ----- From: "David & Liz Fisher" <[email protected]> To: "anthony sharp" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 3:06 PM Subject: Yet more WATTS > Hi Carole and every one, > > Firstly, I've had a great time going through the Hawkesbury CD produced > last summer. Thanks to all concerned. Like Carole, I arrived seeking > the roots of one WATTS family member and found more than I could have > dreamed of, not least the friendly support and interest of other list > members. > > I have been listening in to the recent WATTS conversations and after a > trawl thro the 1871 census in the Family Record Centre yesterday now > have one more WATTS to add to Carole's bulging file. > > My greatgrandmother Sarah Jane WATTS (1854 - 1949) was the daughter of > John WATTS (1821-1900) who was in turn son of John WATTS (1791 - 1881), > the butcher from Upton, and Jane Pritchard. This line seems strong on > longevity! > > The new WATTS is a brother Walter for Sarah Jane, shown in 1871 age 9 > living in Lower Kilcott with his widowed father John and sister, GRO > confirms the birth as Walter WATTS, Dec qu 1861 Chipping Sodbury 6a 158. > > There is an 1881 entry for a private in the Horfield barracks, which I > think must be him although the ages and dates dont tally perfectly - > unless any one knows better of course. They give a Walter WATTS , born > 1863 in Hawkesbury, age 18. I've found nothing so far on the 1901 > census. > > If anyone knows anything about him I'd be interested to hear from them > > Liz >

Hello Carole, I don't think is likely to help you much but just in case ................... I have some Wiltshire Sainsbury's. Samuel CHAPPELL married Sarah SAINSBURY. Samuel was the son of Ely CHAPPELL and Ann Lawrence HISCOX. Sarah was the daughter of William SAINSBURY and Mary. Sarah's brother William Albert SAINSBURY married Mary Ann CHAPPELL - Samuel's sister. I have more information about this family if you want it. By the way, I had a look for your Richard WATTS, Quaker yesterday. He doesn't appear to have been buried in Oldbury on the Hill. Best wishes Sue Sissons

Hi Carole and every one, Firstly, I've had a great time going through the Hawkesbury CD produced last summer. Thanks to all concerned. Like Carole, I arrived seeking the roots of one WATTS family member and found more than I could have dreamed of, not least the friendly support and interest of other list members. I have been listening in to the recent WATTS conversations and after a trawl thro the 1871 census in the Family Record Centre yesterday now have one more WATTS to add to Carole's bulging file. My greatgrandmother Sarah Jane WATTS (1854 - 1949) was the daughter of John WATTS (1821-1900) who was in turn son of John WATTS (1791 - 1881), the butcher from Upton, and Jane Pritchard. This line seems strong on longevity! The new WATTS is a brother Walter for Sarah Jane, shown in 1871 age 9 living in Lower Kilcott with his widowed father John and sister, GRO confirms the birth as Walter WATTS, Dec qu 1861 Chipping Sodbury 6a 158. There is an 1881 entry for a private in the Horfield barracks, which I think must be him although the ages and dates dont tally perfectly - unless any one knows better of course. They give a Walter WATTS , born 1863 in Hawkesbury, age 18. I've found nothing so far on the 1901 census. If anyone knows anything about him I'd be interested to hear from them Liz

Hello Ray Thanks for your email. Gloucestershire FHS Marriages CD has Thomas ARTHURS marrying Hannah SANSBURY at Hawkesbury 3 Nov 1822 by Banns. There is also James SAINSBURY marrying Betty SNELL at Hawkesbury 12 May 1830. also by Banns.. No LANSBURYs at all. so seems I am confusing my Ls and S'sssss! Many thanks Carole ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:43 PM Subject: Re: [HWK] LANSBURY or SANSBURY or SAINSBURY > hello Carole > I am researching the Arthurs family of Hillesley. I have found a > Thomas Arthurs who was baptised in Hawkesbury in December 1800 who married Hannah > Sainsbury who came from Acton Turville. According to the census returns she > was born sometime between 1803 and 1811. I do not know where or when they > married but it was probably about 1825. Only a small piece of information but it > may fit into your research somewhere. > > regards > Ray >

hello Carole I am researching the Arthurs family of Hillesley. I have found a Thomas Arthurs who was baptised in Hawkesbury in December 1800 who married Hannah Sainsbury who came from Acton Turville. According to the census returns she was born sometime between 1803 and 1811. I do not know where or when they married but it was probably about 1825. Only a small piece of information but it may fit into your research somewhere. regards Ray

Hi John and All Pleased you find this story fascinating. I always worry that people without an obvious connection with the names will not be interested.and curse me for sending too many irrelevant messages to clog up their servers! When I first subscribed I thought I had only a vague connection with Hawkesbury with the marriage of Daniel WATTS & Sarah WATTS in 1804. I didn't even know where Hawkesbury was! Now, through the help of everyone on this list, I seem to find that the WATTS were connected to just about every family you can think of. I've learnt about the geography, geology, trades, agriculture, transport, .... all sorts of things - not forgetting the pubs of course. Perhaps this is an appropriate time to thank the Pond Dipper for all his hard work in the early days and a great big thank you to Robert MILLARD for setting up his website and letting everyone share our resources. Without you I wouldn't have such huge files. THANK YOU!!! Carole PS. For Robert - No, I don't want any favours at the moment! Original Message ----- From: "john stinchcombe" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:53 AM Subject: RE [HWK] Toghill-Watts etc > Greetings to all on a dismal Jan day, > Sorry I cant help with the detail of this fascinating story,but find it reassuring to have continuity of local names over time. In the 30's I lived at Hamswell (bottom of Freezing Hill and c 2/3 way between Hawkesbury and Royal Crescent,Bath) and in our parish,Cold Ashton, we had both Toghill and Pritchard families--both now gone I think. > Also,isn't it rather surprising that so few Hawkesbury people found their way to Bath for employment in it's heyday--did Badminton soak up most of our spare labour,or havn't I looked hard enough? By comparison some folk turn up in Bristol,if only for clandestine marriages. john s > > ps have just remembered, I used to cut hay for Thomas Toghill in his retirement (by tractor mower) and he fuelled me with red currant pie from his garden at Vine Cottage; in earlier days he cut our hay by horse mower starting about 5am----waves of nostalgia > > ______________________________

Evening All It didn't take me long to find another question to ask you!! On 5th January 1804 Sarah WATTS (parents so far unknown) married Charles LANSBURY or SANSBURY or SAINSBURY at Hawkesbury. Both shown as of this parish. Witness John LANSBURY etc. All made their mark.. I have a copy of the entry from the register and it looks like LANSBURY, but each time I've seen a transcript it is SAINSBURY or SANSBURY. There are SAINSBURY burials at Acton Turville which just might be them. Does anyone know anything about this family plesae? Best wishes Carole

William was likely born at Hawkesbury. Free BMD gives Births Jun 1838 Coates William Chipping Sodbury 11 217 I'm not sure we would gain anything from the certificate though. I still think William and Hannah probably did a bit of deception in Wales. Doug on 20/1/04 9:24 pm, Steve Baker at [email protected] wrote: > Both George COATES born 1836 and William COATES born 1838 are both listed as > born in Hawkesbury to William COATES and Hannah CHAPPELL on the LDS site but > recorded by a member of LDS not from records. > It seems odd that they would have two children before they married in 1839 > or was that the norm in those days. > I wonder if there was a reason for them being in Chepstow in Monmouthshire, > I wonder if it is to do with Hannah CHAPPELL's parents but she was born in > Sherston Wiltshire. > Regards > Steve Baker > West Yorkshire > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Doug Thompson" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 4:43 PM > Subject: Re: [HWK] COATES family 1861 census look up > > >> So - they pretended to be married when they were living in Wales, but had > to >> make it legal when they moved back to Hawkesbury. Is that right? >> >> Doug >> >> on 19/1/04 2:32 pm, Richard Teagle at [email protected] wrote: >> >>> >>> George Coates christened 23 Oct 1836, Trevethin, Monmouthshire, parents: >>> William and Hannah Coates >>> >>> >>> Richard Teagle >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Doug Thompson [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: 18 January 2004 23:50 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [HWK] COATES family 1861 census look up >>> >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> I wonder who George's mother was. I'm not certain that George or William >>> were Hannah's sons. She only married William in 1839. >>> >>> Doug >> >> >> ==== ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY Mailing List ==== >> Please remember when you post messages that SURNAMES should be in > CAPITALS. >> >> ============================== >> Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration >> Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more. >> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237 >> >> >> > > > ==== ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY Mailing List ==== > Please remember when you post messages that SURNAMES should be in CAPITALS. > > ============================== > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more. > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237 >

Both George COATES born 1836 and William COATES born 1838 are both listed as born in Hawkesbury to William COATES and Hannah CHAPPELL on the LDS site but recorded by a member of LDS not from records. It seems odd that they would have two children before they married in 1839 or was that the norm in those days. I wonder if there was a reason for them being in Chepstow in Monmouthshire, I wonder if it is to do with Hannah CHAPPELL's parents but she was born in Sherston Wiltshire. Regards Steve Baker West Yorkshire ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Thompson" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 4:43 PM Subject: Re: [HWK] COATES family 1861 census look up > So - they pretended to be married when they were living in Wales, but had to > make it legal when they moved back to Hawkesbury. Is that right? > > Doug > > on 19/1/04 2:32 pm, Richard Teagle at [email protected] wrote: > > > > > George Coates christened 23 Oct 1836, Trevethin, Monmouthshire, parents: > > William and Hannah Coates > > > > > > Richard Teagle > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Doug Thompson [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 18 January 2004 23:50 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [HWK] COATES family 1861 census look up > > > > > > Steve > > > > I wonder who George's mother was. I'm not certain that George or William > > were Hannah's sons. She only married William in 1839. > > > > Doug > > > ==== ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY Mailing List ==== > Please remember when you post messages that SURNAMES should be in CAPITALS. > > ============================== > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more. > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237 > > >

Greetings to all on a dismal Jan day, Sorry I cant help with the detail of this fascinating story,but find it reassuring to have continuity of local names over time. In the 30's I lived at Hamswell (bottom of Freezing Hill and c 2/3 way between Hawkesbury and Royal Crescent,Bath) and in our parish,Cold Ashton, we had both Toghill and Pritchard families--both now gone I think. Also,isn't it rather surprising that so few Hawkesbury people found their way to Bath for employment in it's heyday--did Badminton soak up most of our spare labour,or havn't I looked hard enough? By comparison some folk turn up in Bristol,if only for clandestine marriages. john s ps have just remembered, I used to cut hay for Thomas Toghill in his retirement (by tractor mower) and he fuelled me with red currant pie from his garden at Vine Cottage; in earlier days he cut our hay by horse mower starting about 5am----waves of nostalgia

It's not all my own work! Some comes from my extremely helpful cousin D Kay Buchanan in Australia. I copy him any interesting emails on the WATTS & PRITCHARD families. . My thanks to Bob and Brian for their input. I guess its about time to leave this family and think of a new topic of conversation! Just give me a few moments. Cheers Carole

So - they pretended to be married when they were living in Wales, but had to make it legal when they moved back to Hawkesbury. Is that right? Doug on 19/1/04 2:32 pm, Richard Teagle at [email protected] wrote: > > George Coates christened 23 Oct 1836, Trevethin, Monmouthshire, parents: > William and Hannah Coates > > > Richard Teagle > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Thompson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 18 January 2004 23:50 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [HWK] COATES family 1861 census look up > > > Steve > > I wonder who George's mother was. I'm not certain that George or William > were Hannah's sons. She only married William in 1839. > > Doug

George Coates christened 23 Oct 1836, Trevethin, Monmouthshire, parents: William and Hannah Coates Richard Teagle -----Original Message----- From: Doug Thompson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 18 January 2004 23:50 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HWK] COATES family 1861 census look up Steve I wonder who George's mother was. I'm not certain that George or William were Hannah's sons. She only married William in 1839. Doug on 18/1/04 10:59 pm, Steve Baker at [email protected] wrote: > Doug, > Thank You for looking up COATES family on 1861 census, I have found George > on 1881 census but it states he was born in Hawkesbury (perhaps he did not > know), I wonder why he was born in Chepstow. I have listed his family in > 1881, they were living in Stapleton, Gloucestershire. > > Regards > Steve Baker > West Yorkshire > ==== ENG-GLO-HAWKESBURY Mailing List ==== When replying to messages please make sure to remove ALL the "Re: and Hawks" bits in the subject line as otherwise these will be repeated. ============================== Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more. http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237