In a message dated 04/11/2005 00:10:59 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Hello Pat~ I went into FreeBMD and done each year on 'deaths' from 1841 to 1870. I found 6 Benjamin's that had died. I could not put in the spouse's name, unfortunately. ( His wife's name was Ann) They are: Hull 22/317 March 1841 Hull 22/251 Dec. 1845 Malton 24/307 Dec. 1847 Hull 22/343 March 1849 Skirlaugh 22/506 March 1851 Hull 9d/150 June 1869 Can you give me any help with these? Hello Bill You can discount the first , as you've told me that you have the 1841 Census for him [ taken on 6 June }.....and the last BH has an age given [ under 1 year ]. March 1851 is very unlikely as that census was on 30 March. That leaves you with 4 possibilities ; it's annoying ages at death weren't indexed at that point , though , of course , shown on the actual certificate . Sorry not to be more helpful . What about the other one I sent you ? 1870 ~ age 74 ties in agewise... Good luck Pat
Hi Pat~ Thanks so much for your help, so far. I would like to send for each of the "possible" ones, but rather costly. I would like to order a film, but I cannot bring up any 'deaths' at all on Family Search, for Benjamin Harrison after 1841. I shall ponder over what to do next. Thanks again. Bill, Ontario, Canada. > In a message dated 04/11/2005 00:10:59 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] > writes: > > Hello Pat~ > I went into FreeBMD and done each year on 'deaths' from 1841 to 1870. > I found 6 Benjamin's that had died. I could not put in the spouse's name, > unfortunately. ( His wife's name was Ann) > They are: Hull 22/317 March 1841 > Hull 22/251 Dec. 1845 > Malton 24/307 Dec. 1847 > Hull 22/343 March 1849 > Skirlaugh 22/506 March 1851 > Hull 9d/150 June 1869 > Can you give me any help with these? > > > Hello Bill > You can discount the first , as you've told me that you have the 1841 Census > for him [ taken on 6 June }.....and the last BH has an age given [ under 1 > year ]. > March 1851 is very unlikely as that census was on 30 March. > That leaves you with 4 possibilities ; it's annoying ages at death weren't > indexed at that point , though , of course , shown on the actual certificate . > Sorry not to be more helpful . What about the other one I sent you ? 1870 ~ > age 74 ties in agewise... > Good luck > Pat