Could someone with better eyes than I give me a hand? I've located on Ancestry a record of a distant relative in the 1901 census but the page that Ancestry says he's on is so faded I can't find him. I've run the image through photoshop and I still can't see him. He's indexed as Rich Potterell, born abt 1819 (actually born in 1842). Ancestry says he's on Class: /RG13/; Piece: /215/; Folio: /64/; Page: /42... /Thanks in advance :) Tony

If you have no success with this source, do you know the village he is from so you can search parish registers- or ask someone to do a look up for you that way? Judy On Feb 22, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Tony Pottrell wrote: > Could someone with better eyes than I give me a hand? I've located on > Ancestry a record of a distant relative in the 1901 census but the page > that Ancestry says he's on is so faded I can't find him. I've run the > image through photoshop and I still can't see him. > > He's indexed as Rich Potterell, born abt 1819 (actually born in 1842). > Ancestry says he's on Class: /RG13/; Piece: /215/; Folio: /64/; Page: > /42... > > /Thanks in advance :) > > Tony > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Hi Judy, I've got all his other particulars, I'm after his entry on the 1901 census just for completeness :) http://www.pyroport.com/genealogy/people/richard_1842.shtm Cheers, Tony Judy d'Albert wrote: > If you have no success with this source, do you know the village he is > from so you can search parish registers- or ask someone to do a look up > for you that way? > > Judy > On Feb 22, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Tony Pottrell wrote: > > >> Could someone with better eyes than I give me a hand? I've located on >> Ancestry a record of a distant relative in the 1901 census but the page >> that Ancestry says he's on is so faded I can't find him. I've run the >> image through photoshop and I still can't see him. >> >> He's indexed as Rich Potterell, born abt 1819 (actually born in 1842). >> Ancestry says he's on Class: /RG13/; Piece: /215/; Folio: /64/; Page: >> /42... >> >> /Thanks in advance :) >> >> Tony >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >

Hi Tony That's because the pages are out of order. Click the "Next" button until page 45 (of 67) shows at the top. He is there - ex city Policeman, but it is not easy to read. Regards Maureen -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Pottrell Sent: 22 February 2007 19:48 To: [email protected] Subject: [ENG-CAMS] 1901 Census Could someone with better eyes than I give me a hand? I've located on Ancestry a record of a distant relative in the 1901 census but the page that Ancestry says he's on is so faded I can't find him. I've run the image through photoshop and I still can't see him. He's indexed as Rich Potterell, born abt 1819 (actually born in 1842). Ancestry says he's on Class: /RG13/; Piece: /215/; Folio: /64/; Page: /42... /Thanks in advance :) Tony ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message