Hi Ron, Forgive me if I'm stating the obvious, because I don't know how experienced you are in genealogy, but have you considered that the only difference between Embleton and Imbleton in the period to which you refer may well be simply one of pronunciation? At that time most of the the inhabitants of these Cambridgeshire villages would not have been able to read or write. Even if they could, registers at the time were not signed by the parties concerned. The registers were written by the minister or a parish clerk who would write down what he heard the person say. In many cases the minister or clerk would write up the events, not as they occurred, but at the end of the month, the quarter, or even in some cases, the year. Add to that the fact that spelling in general was by no means fixed at the time and it is not surprising that we often see a large number of variants of the same name. My point is simply that there is probably nothing purposeful about the interchange of Embleton and Imbleton. On a personal note, one of my great grandmothers, whom I was lucky enough to know in person, was married in the 1880's. She could not read or write and gave her surname LODGE. The curate officiating at the marriage wrote down LARGE. Great-granny was born just across the county border from Cambridgeshire, in Suffolk, and I don't think she had a particularly 'broad' accent, but LARGE is what the curate heard. Best wishes Michael OUTLAW Shanklin, Isle of Wight. Seeking OUTLAWs anywhere. ----- Original Message ----- From: "ronwake" <ronwake@iinet.net.au> To: <ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:08 PM Subject: [ENG-CAMS] Embleton to Imbleton, Great Abington and Linton >I am researching the names EMBLETON and IMBLETON in the villages of Great >Abington and Linton. I am confused about the interchange from EMBLETON to >IMBLETON in the period 1618 to about 1716. > I have John Embleton; c. 09 Aug 1618 Great Abington, son of Richard > Embleton and Jane Ward. > John Embleton; c. 24 Oct 1634 Great Abington, son of John and Elizabeth > Embleton; > Laurence (Lawrence) Embleton; c. 01 Aug 1675 Great Abington, son of John > and Alice Embleton.; Laurence married Thomasin Morley 05 Oct 1701 at Great > Abington, his surname IM BLETON. (IGI Batch No.: M134011) > Their first two children both christened John EMBLETON, 14 Apr 1702 and 27 > Aug 1703 at Great Abington, the first John was buried 16 Apr 1702. > The rest of his children were christened in Linton with the surname of > Imbleton > Laurence was buried 16 Oct 1750 Linton Cambridgeshire. > His ninth child, Mary IMBLETON, c. 08 Jan1717 Linton; married Xenophon > Hearn, 27 Jul 1742 at Ickleton, Cambridgeshire. > Confused > Ron Wakefield, S.E. Queensland > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Thanks Liane - added confirmation that he isn't mine. Cheers Simon lfenimore wrote: > That Francis J Annable on the passenger list seems to be the same fellow on > the U.S. WWI draft registrations. He was b 21 Jan 1880, living in > Washington DC, and from the city of Nottingham. He was a foreman carpenter > and he is still in Washington on the 1920 census. On the draft form he > called himself a foreman carpenter. He came back into the U.S. on the > Cedric 17 Apr 1910 and had a wife in Nottingham. He was 30 and gave his > place of birth on the passenger list as Derby. > > If you want any more from these sources, just let me know. > > Liane > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.146/2627 - Release Date: 01/16/10 19:35:00 > >

That Francis J Annable on the passenger list seems to be the same fellow on the U.S. WWI draft registrations. He was b 21 Jan 1880, living in Washington DC, and from the city of Nottingham. He was a foreman carpenter and he is still in Washington on the 1920 census. On the draft form he called himself a foreman carpenter. He came back into the U.S. on the Cedric 17 Apr 1910 and had a wife in Nottingham. He was 30 and gave his place of birth on the passenger list as Derby. If you want any more from these sources, just let me know. Liane

Hi Simon, It's me again! I was on FreeBMD just now and put in your Francis Anable, just in case, and I found the following: Marriages Mar 1910 Annable Francis Joseph Nottingham 7b 645 BROWN Celia Nottingham 7b 645 Then I went to the 1911 census and found this: 1911 - RG14PN20617 RG78PN1231 RD430 SD4 ED25 SN166 7 Chances Villas Chancer Street Nottingham NTT CHAMBERLIN, Harold Head Married M 31 1880 Fruiterer Nottingham CHAMBERLIN, Priscilla Wife Married F 31 1880 Assisting In The Business Nottingham CHAMBERLIN, Laura Daughter Single F 9 1902 Nottingham CHAMBERLIN, Sybil Daughter Single F 7 1904 Nottingham CHAMBERLIN, Phylis Daughter Single F 5 1906 Nottingham BROWN, Maria Mother In Law Widow F 65 1846 Earith Huntingham BROWN, John Brother In Law Single M 27 1884 Fruiterer Nottingham BROWN, Ada Sister In Law Single F 25 1886 Blouse Machinist Nottingham BROWN, Florence Sister In Law Single F 23 1888 Stationary Printer Nottingham *ANNABLE, Celia Sister In Law Married F 29 1882 Nottingham ANNABLE, Lilian Niece Single F 0 (6 MONTHS) 1911 Nottingham ANNABLE, Ada Niece Single F 0 (6 MONTHS) 1911 Nottingham B*ut I couldn't find a Frank/Francis that fitted in at all. Again it could be a false lead, Sylvia (my friends say that I am like a dog with a bone when I get my teeth into something!!)

Hi Simon, Even if they are not your man, I have found in genealogy that a negative is a positive by elimination!! Happy Hunting Sylvia (Perth) Simon wrote: > that looks very promising! I shall follow it up! As I understand it, > your findings suggest that these two entries could refer to the same > person (Amable is a frequent misrecording of Anable) Leaving the UK in > 1906 and returning in 1909. At the least I need to eliminate him from my > enquiries.... > > Simon > > > > >

Hi Simon, I didn't think the death I gave you was correct, but I look for anything that could possible help with research via further information. After 15 years of searching I found a couple from my husband's family had gone to America in 1880, so I did a cursory look on Ancestery.co.uk and found the following. Don't know whether they are of any help - but you never know!! New York Passenger List Name Arrival Date Estimated birth year Port of Departure Ethnicity/ Nationality Ship Name Francis Joseph Annable 6 Apr 1906 abt 1880 Liverpool, England English Baltic UK Incoming Passenger List Name Age Birth Date Arrival Date Port of Departure Port of Arrival Francis Amable - 21 Dec 1909 New York, New York, United States Liverpool, England and Queenstown, Ireland Sylvia (in Perth, Western Aiustralia - not Peth!!) Simon wrote: > Thanks for finding that, Sylvia. Unfortunately, that's a cousin of my > Frank's! The Cambridgeshire Anables had families in Caxton, Dry Drayton > and Chesterton at the end of the 19th Century. The Caxton branch seem to > have used the same names for their boys as my lot! > >

That's very kind of you, Sylvia - and long may you be like a dog with a bone! Sylvia, this is almost certainly not part of my family. There are two main 19th century clusters of Anables/Annables in England, one around Cambridge and the other around Derby/Nottingham, and I feel sure this is the other lot. I also know now that my great-great-uncle was both registered and baptised as simply Francis Anable, not Francis Joseph Anable. Joseph is not a common name in my family. I think the family you have found below are quite probably that of the Francis Joseph Anable you found crossing the Atlantic in both directions earlier today - I am very much afraid it is not the answer to my puzzle - yet. Simon Sylvia Rawlings wrote: > Hi Simon, > > It's me again! I was on FreeBMD just now and put in your Francis > Anable, just in case, and I found the following: > > Marriages Mar 1910 > Annable Francis Joseph Nottingham 7b 645 > BROWN Celia Nottingham 7b 645 > > Then I went to the 1911 census and found this: > > 1911 - RG14PN20617 RG78PN1231 RD430 SD4 ED25 SN166 > 7 Chances Villas Chancer Street Nottingham NTT > > CHAMBERLIN, Harold Head Married M 31 1880 Fruiterer Nottingham > CHAMBERLIN, Priscilla Wife Married F 31 1880 Assisting In The Business > Nottingham > CHAMBERLIN, Laura Daughter Single F 9 1902 Nottingham > CHAMBERLIN, Sybil Daughter Single F 7 1904 Nottingham > CHAMBERLIN, Phylis Daughter Single F 5 1906 Nottingham > BROWN, Maria Mother In Law Widow F 65 1846 Earith Huntingham > BROWN, John Brother In Law Single M 27 1884 Fruiterer Nottingham > BROWN, Ada Sister In Law Single F 25 1886 Blouse Machinist Nottingham > BROWN, Florence Sister In Law Single F 23 1888 Stationary Printer > Nottingham > *ANNABLE, Celia Sister In Law Married F 29 1882 Nottingham > ANNABLE, Lilian Niece Single F 0 (6 MONTHS) 1911 Nottingham > ANNABLE, Ada Niece Single F 0 (6 MONTHS) 1911 Nottingham > > B*ut I couldn't find a Frank/Francis that fitted in at all. > > Again it could be a false lead, > > Sylvia (my friends say that I am like a dog with a bone when I get my > teeth into something!!) > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.145/2626 - Release Date: 01/16/10 07:35:00 > >

Sylvia that looks very promising! I shall follow it up! As I understand it, your findings suggest that these two entries could refer to the same person (Amable is a frequent misrecording of Anable) Leaving the UK in 1906 and returning in 1909. At the least I need to eliminate him from my enquiries.... Simon Sylvia Rawlings wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I didn't think the death I gave you was correct, but I look for anything > that could possible help with research via further information. After > 15 years of searching I found a couple from my husband's family had gone > to America in 1880, so I did a cursory look on Ancestery.co.uk and found > the following. Don't know whether they are of any help - but you never > know!! > > New York Passenger List > > Name Arrival Date Estimated birth year > Port of Departure Ethnicity/ Nationality Ship Name > Francis Joseph Annable 6 Apr 1906 abt 1880 > Liverpool, England English Baltic > > UK Incoming Passenger List > > Name Age Birth Date Arrival Date Port of > Departure Port of Arrival > Francis Amable - 21 Dec 1909 New York, New York, > United States Liverpool, England and Queenstown, Ireland > > Sylvia (in Perth, Western Aiustralia - not Peth!!) > > > Simon wrote: > >> Thanks for finding that, Sylvia. Unfortunately, that's a cousin of my >> Frank's! The Cambridgeshire Anables had families in Caxton, Dry Drayton >> and Chesterton at the end of the 19th Century. The Caxton branch seem to >> have used the same names for their boys as my lot! >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.145/2626 - Release Date: 01/16/10 07:35:00 > >

Hi John yes, it is a surname with a considerable number of different spellings! There were clusters of Anables in south Cambridgeshire and south Derbyshire, apparently unrelated. But other spellings are more common, particularly Annable, Annible and Annibal - and, as you can imagine, it was often misrecorded as Hannibal by census enumerators. My great-great-uncle William became William Mable when findmypast transcribed the 1911 - the capital A and lower case n looking like a M when written carelessly. But I am thinking that Frank's death, if recorded, would be unlikely to be mistranscribed, as it would have been typed. This makes me think that it really isn't there, and I need to look abroad. Thanks anyway for the information. Simon John Orchard wrote: > Hi Simon > > I don't know if it is helpful but across in Lincolnshire today there is at > least one person with the surname Annibal - presumably another variant on > the surname that you are seeking. > > Regards > John > > -----Original Message----- > From: eng-cambridgeshire-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:eng-cambridgeshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Simon > Sent: 15 January 2010 19:39 > To: eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com > Subject: [ENG-CAMS] Francis ANABLE Dry Drayton > > Hello all > > I'm keen to trace what happened to my great-great-uncle Francis ANABLE, > who was born in Dry Drayton in 1878. He was the eldest child of Samuel > and Lydia Anable, and had five brothers and sisters: William, Alice (my > great-grandmother), Percy, Susan and Harry. He appears at home in Dry > Drayton in 1881 and 1891, but then disappears off the censuses. > > In 1911, Samuel declared that he and Lydia had had six children, five of > whom were still alive: the other five children are traceable on the 1911 > census, which means that Francis is the one who died. > > However, I can find no trace of Francis's death. It is not mentioned in > the Dry Drayton PRs: but then again, all five of his siblings left Dry > Drayton for various destinations and did not return, so perhaps he did > as well. I cannot find a death registered for a Francis or Frank Anable > (or of the more common spelling Annable) anywhere between 1891 and 1911. > Anable is an uncommon surname, but it is frequently misrecorded and > mistranscribed: I am assuming, however, that death registrations would > be less likely to be misrecorded or mistranscribed than, say, census > returns. > > The Anables, like all my great-grandparents' families, were poor working > class. The two possibilities that strike me as most likely are that he > either joined the army or went abroad for work, and in either case met > with his death outside of Great Britain. He was 13 at the time of the > 1891 census, and might have gone into service a couple of years after > that. He could have joined the army from 1896 onwards. > > If anyone has any ideas, they would be most gratefully received! > > Simon Knott > www.norfolkchurches.co.uk > www.suffolkchurches.co.uk > Finding CORNELL, CORNWELL, MORTLOCK, REYNOLDS, ANABLE, STEARN, PAGE and > CROSS in Cambridgeshire > Finding KNOTT, WATERS, HARRELL and BOWLES in north-west Kent > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.144/2625 - Release Date: 01/15/10 19:35:00 > >

Thanks for finding that, Sylvia. Unfortunately, that's a cousin of my Frank's! The Cambridgeshire Anables had families in Caxton, Dry Drayton and Chesterton at the end of the 19th Century. The Caxton branch seem to have used the same names for their boys as my lot! Simon Sylvia Rawlings wrote: > Hi Simon; > > I found this on freeBMD and wonder if it could be the one you are seeking > > Deaths Dec 1928 > Anable Frank 31 Caxton 3b 445 > > Sylvia (Peth, Western Austalia) > > > Simon wrote: > >> I'm keen to trace what happened to my great-great-uncle Francis ANABLE, >> who was born in Dry Drayton in 1878. He was the eldest child of Samuel >> and Lydia Anable, and had five brothers and sisters: William, Alice (my >> great-grandmother), Percy, Susan and Harry. He appears at home in Dry >> Drayton in 1881 and 1891, but then disappears off the censuses. >> >> I >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.144/2625 - Release Date: 01/15/10 19:35:00 > >

Hi Simon; I found this on freeBMD and wonder if it could be the one you are seeking Deaths Dec 1928 Anable Frank 31 Caxton 3b 445 Sylvia (Peth, Western Austalia) Simon wrote: > I'm keen to trace what happened to my great-great-uncle Francis ANABLE, > who was born in Dry Drayton in 1878. He was the eldest child of Samuel > and Lydia Anable, and had five brothers and sisters: William, Alice (my > great-grandmother), Percy, Susan and Harry. He appears at home in Dry > Drayton in 1881 and 1891, but then disappears off the censuses. > > I

Hi Simon I don't know if it is helpful but across in Lincolnshire today there is at least one person with the surname Annibal - presumably another variant on the surname that you are seeking. Regards John -----Original Message----- From: eng-cambridgeshire-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-cambridgeshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Simon Sent: 15 January 2010 19:39 To: eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com Subject: [ENG-CAMS] Francis ANABLE Dry Drayton Hello all I'm keen to trace what happened to my great-great-uncle Francis ANABLE, who was born in Dry Drayton in 1878. He was the eldest child of Samuel and Lydia Anable, and had five brothers and sisters: William, Alice (my great-grandmother), Percy, Susan and Harry. He appears at home in Dry Drayton in 1881 and 1891, but then disappears off the censuses. In 1911, Samuel declared that he and Lydia had had six children, five of whom were still alive: the other five children are traceable on the 1911 census, which means that Francis is the one who died. However, I can find no trace of Francis's death. It is not mentioned in the Dry Drayton PRs: but then again, all five of his siblings left Dry Drayton for various destinations and did not return, so perhaps he did as well. I cannot find a death registered for a Francis or Frank Anable (or of the more common spelling Annable) anywhere between 1891 and 1911. Anable is an uncommon surname, but it is frequently misrecorded and mistranscribed: I am assuming, however, that death registrations would be less likely to be misrecorded or mistranscribed than, say, census returns. The Anables, like all my great-grandparents' families, were poor working class. The two possibilities that strike me as most likely are that he either joined the army or went abroad for work, and in either case met with his death outside of Great Britain. He was 13 at the time of the 1891 census, and might have gone into service a couple of years after that. He could have joined the army from 1896 onwards. If anyone has any ideas, they would be most gratefully received! Simon Knott www.norfolkchurches.co.uk www.suffolkchurches.co.uk Finding CORNELL, CORNWELL, MORTLOCK, REYNOLDS, ANABLE, STEARN, PAGE and CROSS in Cambridgeshire Finding KNOTT, WATERS, HARRELL and BOWLES in north-west Kent ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello all I'm keen to trace what happened to my great-great-uncle Francis ANABLE, who was born in Dry Drayton in 1878. He was the eldest child of Samuel and Lydia Anable, and had five brothers and sisters: William, Alice (my great-grandmother), Percy, Susan and Harry. He appears at home in Dry Drayton in 1881 and 1891, but then disappears off the censuses. In 1911, Samuel declared that he and Lydia had had six children, five of whom were still alive: the other five children are traceable on the 1911 census, which means that Francis is the one who died. However, I can find no trace of Francis's death. It is not mentioned in the Dry Drayton PRs: but then again, all five of his siblings left Dry Drayton for various destinations and did not return, so perhaps he did as well. I cannot find a death registered for a Francis or Frank Anable (or of the more common spelling Annable) anywhere between 1891 and 1911. Anable is an uncommon surname, but it is frequently misrecorded and mistranscribed: I am assuming, however, that death registrations would be less likely to be misrecorded or mistranscribed than, say, census returns. The Anables, like all my great-grandparents' families, were poor working class. The two possibilities that strike me as most likely are that he either joined the army or went abroad for work, and in either case met with his death outside of Great Britain. He was 13 at the time of the 1891 census, and might have gone into service a couple of years after that. He could have joined the army from 1896 onwards. If anyone has any ideas, they would be most gratefully received! Simon Knott www.norfolkchurches.co.uk www.suffolkchurches.co.uk Finding CORNELL, CORNWELL, MORTLOCK, REYNOLDS, ANABLE, STEARN, PAGE and CROSS in Cambridgeshire Finding KNOTT, WATERS, HARRELL and BOWLES in north-west Kent

Hi Alan, No, I don't believe that we have had previous contact. SELL & RANDALL are both on the wife's side. SELL comes into the family twice. (1) John SELL b c1675 m Mary ? c1698. I have 8 children of this marriage, the fourth being Elizabeth bapt 27.3.1705 Litlington & married Abel SADLER 22.2.1725. Then follows Elizabeth SADLER m 1765 Thos PARKER; William PARKER m 1798 Ann WHISSON; Elizabeth PARKER m 1815 James BALL; George BALL m 1862 Ann SHARP; Elizabeth BALL m 1885 Arthur HOWARD - all of these marriages were in Litlington. Arthue HOWARD & family emigrated to Australia in 1907, but his brother Joseph emigrated in 1888 & their father Joseph in 1894. (2) Geoffrey/Jeffrey SELL was b c1814 Litlington (1881 census), however, I have not seen evidence of this, or have missed it in transcription. I know nothing of his forbears, but have some SELL's transcribed, but not yet allocated. He married Mary Ann RANDALL 1835, again in Litlington. I am showing 10 children from this union. Third born Mary b 12.6.1839 married Joseph HOWARD 5.11.1859 - she died 25.3.1879 - all Litlington. Joseph HOWARD, is the father referred to in above. RANDALL. Mary Ann RANDALL is the 2nd child of seven to William RANDALL & Sophia WING. She was bapt 17.8.1817 Litlington. Father William, I show as b c1773 & bapt 14.3.1779 Bassingbourne. I have nothing on his forbears. Sophia WING, I show as b 1.11.1792 & bapt 11.10.1801 Abington Pigotts. She was the last of eight children born to John WING & Alice BIRD. Sophia WING & William RANDALL were married 28.12.1812 Litlington. As I follow all branches of anyone related, I would very much like to hear from you & exchange data - maybe by way of GEDCOM Regards, John Wareham ----- Original Message ----- From: "AlanMCraven" <alanmcraven@btinternet.com> To: <eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 10:55 PM Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] FLANDERS - Melbourn > Hi John > > Interested in your list of ancestors. Both Randall and Sell appear in my > family tree, the Randall's being from Litlington. Have we been in touch > in > the past? > > Best Wishes > > Alan Craven > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "John Wareham" <maheraw@optusnet.com.au> > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 7:43 PM > To: <eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com> > Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] FLANDERS - Melbourn > >> Hi Peter, >> Many thanks for the response. >> I thought she was the illegit. daughter of one of the FLANDERS sisters, >> but >> was unsure as to which one. >> I have hired & viewed many of the parish registers around Melbourn, >> Wimpole, >> Kingston, Litlington etc, but for some reason stopped at 1845 in >> Melbourn. >> Any other FLANDERS, after 1845 (I have the marriage of Maria & Cornelius >> COOPER) would be appreciated if not too much trouble. >> My wife & I are both directly descended from this area & renewed our 25 >> year >> vows in the Wimpole church in 1998. >> My direct line names in this region, are PETT, BROWN, MILLER, NEWELL, >> HOWARD, SELL, CAMP, RANDALL, WING, MATHEWS, BALL, SHARP, PARKER, >> PETTENGELL, >> WHISSON, CHRISTMAS & HALL. - we are thick on the ground - in fact the >> wifes >> family are 6 generations in Litlington >> I have a subscription to 1911 census. If you need any images, please ask. >> Regards, >> John >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Peter Jarman" <p.jarman@ntlworld.com> >> To: <eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 6:02 PM >> Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] FLANDERS - Melbourn >> >> >>> Hi John >>> >>> In Melbourn PRs (Cambs FHS Disc) >>> >>> Julia Selina Flanders born 23 Apr 1848 and christened All Saints, >>> Melbourn >>> 9 >>> Jan 1853 >>> Daughter of Emily Flanders >>> >>> More Flanders on this disc if you need them >>> >>> Peter Jarman >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: eng-cambridgeshire-bounces@rootsweb.com >>> [mailto:eng-cambridgeshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of John >>> Wareham >>> Sent: 12 January 2010 05:40 >>> To: eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com >>> Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] FLANDERS - Melbourn >>> >>> Apologies list (& Rose) my post should have read:- >>> Could SKS please advise parentage of Julia FLANDERS, born Melbourn & >>> aged >>> 4 >>> (1851 census) >>> With thanks >>> John Wareham >>> Springfield, NSW, Australia >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >>> without >>> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.132/2611 - Release Date: >>> 01/10/10 >>> 07:35:00 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >>> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Hi John Interested in your list of ancestors. Both Randall and Sell appear in my family tree, the Randall's being from Litlington. Have we been in touch in the past? Best Wishes Alan Craven -------------------------------------------------- From: "John Wareham" <maheraw@optusnet.com.au> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 7:43 PM To: <eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com> Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] FLANDERS - Melbourn > Hi Peter, > Many thanks for the response. > I thought she was the illegit. daughter of one of the FLANDERS sisters, > but > was unsure as to which one. > I have hired & viewed many of the parish registers around Melbourn, > Wimpole, > Kingston, Litlington etc, but for some reason stopped at 1845 in Melbourn. > Any other FLANDERS, after 1845 (I have the marriage of Maria & Cornelius > COOPER) would be appreciated if not too much trouble. > My wife & I are both directly descended from this area & renewed our 25 > year > vows in the Wimpole church in 1998. > My direct line names in this region, are PETT, BROWN, MILLER, NEWELL, > HOWARD, SELL, CAMP, RANDALL, WING, MATHEWS, BALL, SHARP, PARKER, > PETTENGELL, > WHISSON, CHRISTMAS & HALL. - we are thick on the ground - in fact the > wifes > family are 6 generations in Litlington > I have a subscription to 1911 census. If you need any images, please ask. > Regards, > John > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Jarman" <p.jarman@ntlworld.com> > To: <eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 6:02 PM > Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] FLANDERS - Melbourn > > >> Hi John >> >> In Melbourn PRs (Cambs FHS Disc) >> >> Julia Selina Flanders born 23 Apr 1848 and christened All Saints, >> Melbourn >> 9 >> Jan 1853 >> Daughter of Emily Flanders >> >> More Flanders on this disc if you need them >> >> Peter Jarman >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: eng-cambridgeshire-bounces@rootsweb.com >> [mailto:eng-cambridgeshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of John >> Wareham >> Sent: 12 January 2010 05:40 >> To: eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com >> Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] FLANDERS - Melbourn >> >> Apologies list (& Rose) my post should have read:- >> Could SKS please advise parentage of Julia FLANDERS, born Melbourn & aged >> 4 >> (1851 census) >> With thanks >> John Wareham >> Springfield, NSW, Australia >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without >> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.132/2611 - Release Date: >> 01/10/10 >> 07:35:00 >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Peter, Many thanks for the response. I thought she was the illegit. daughter of one of the FLANDERS sisters, but was unsure as to which one. I have hired & viewed many of the parish registers around Melbourn, Wimpole, Kingston, Litlington etc, but for some reason stopped at 1845 in Melbourn. Any other FLANDERS, after 1845 (I have the marriage of Maria & Cornelius COOPER) would be appreciated if not too much trouble. My wife & I are both directly descended from this area & renewed our 25 year vows in the Wimpole church in 1998. My direct line names in this region, are PETT, BROWN, MILLER, NEWELL, HOWARD, SELL, CAMP, RANDALL, WING, MATHEWS, BALL, SHARP, PARKER, PETTENGELL, WHISSON, CHRISTMAS & HALL. - we are thick on the ground - in fact the wifes family are 6 generations in Litlington I have a subscription to 1911 census. If you need any images, please ask. Regards, John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Jarman" <p.jarman@ntlworld.com> To: <eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 6:02 PM Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] FLANDERS - Melbourn > Hi John > > In Melbourn PRs (Cambs FHS Disc) > > Julia Selina Flanders born 23 Apr 1848 and christened All Saints, Melbourn > 9 > Jan 1853 > Daughter of Emily Flanders > > More Flanders on this disc if you need them > > Peter Jarman > > > -----Original Message----- > From: eng-cambridgeshire-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:eng-cambridgeshire-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of John Wareham > Sent: 12 January 2010 05:40 > To: eng-cambridgeshire@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] FLANDERS - Melbourn > > Apologies list (& Rose) my post should have read:- > Could SKS please advise parentage of Julia FLANDERS, born Melbourn & aged > 4 > (1851 census) > With thanks > John Wareham > Springfield, NSW, Australia > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.132/2611 - Release Date: > 01/10/10 > 07:35:00 > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Apologies list (& Rose) my post should have read:- Could SKS please advise parentage of Julia FLANDERS, born Melbourn & aged 4 (1851 census) With thanks John Wareham Springfield, NSW, Australia

Do you have anymore information, the only Julia Flanders I can find in 1861 was born 1844 and living in Melbourn. Cheers, Rose

Could SKS please advise parentage of Julia FLANDERS, born Melbourn & aged 4 (1861 census) With thanks John Wareham Springfield, NSW, Australia

1851 census -HO107 Piece:1708 Folio:201 Page:18 Dolphin Lane, Melbourn FLANDERS, Zechariah Head Married M 46 1805 Carpenter Journeyman Meldreth Cambridgeshire FLANDERS, S Wife Married F 56 1795 Wimpole Cambridgeshire FLANDERS, C Daughter Unmarried F 24 1827 Assistant In House Meldreth Cambridgeshire FLANDERS, Fk Son Unmarried M 20 1831 Carpenter Journeyman Meldreth Cambridgeshire FLANDERS, Julia Grand Daughter F 4 1847 Scholar Melbourn Cambridgeshire Sorry, no parents given, but Julia could possibly be the illegitamate daughter of C. Flanders. I looked at the 1841 census as well to try to ascertain who C. Flanders was, but no-one with that initial was listed. You may have to purchase the birth certificate to find Julia's parents:. Births Jun 1843 ( Flanders Julia Royston &c 6 541 Sylvia. Perth Western Australia John Wareham wrote: > Apologies list (& Rose) my post should have read:- > Could SKS please advise parentage of Julia FLANDERS, born Melbourn & aged 4 > (1851 census) > With thanks > John Wareham > Springfield, NSW, Australia > > > > > >