Just received this announcement from FFHS today . Hope what I copied will open for you to save me typing it out again! Judy BBC Radio 4 is producing a new genealogy show. They are looking for potential stories to feature (along the lines of interesting tales that have been unearthed by those researching their genealogy) and also to produce packages which offer practical advice for someone who's interested in becoming more involved in the practice of genealogy. So, if you or any members of your group are able to help in one or both of these areas, please contact: Bruce Munro Researcher - Radio Features Telephone 0141 338 2282 Email [email protected]

i need some help with a brick wall i hope some one out there in the world of genealogy can help .searching for marriage of Madeline Webber from Peterborough about 1887 . she was born 1868 .i have checked BMD . thank you

I appreciate all of the help and ideas you have given me and I will proceed to check out the sites you have suggested. Much Thanks, Sharon

----- Original Message ----- From: "Carol J. Markillie" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:37 AM Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] English History lesson Carol South Australia and New Zealand did not have convict settlements. Assisted passage..and in the case of young women (as servants in household and eventually brides for the large number of single men) free passage if able to supply their clothing requirements. For others the "ten pound Pom" continued well into the twentieth century....one case I know of til 1983!! to New Zealand Pat > Sharon: > > A lot of the people were sent as prisoners sentenced to transportation. > Others went for the gold rush in Australia. > Others went for land and probably others were organized > by their pastors and their sailing fees were paid by the church. > There were probably many other reasons and I think there is a > new book out about the settling of Australia but you'd have to look it up on > Google under that name or just Early Australia or something of that sort. > > Carol > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Appearance as a witness to a mariage often indicates family friendshipes. Does anyone with ancestors in the Gamlingay/Everton/Tetworth area have the names CHRISTY, FOSTER or DEAN as witnesses to to marriages between 1837 and 1900? Bob Christy

Besides what has already been written, Under the assisted immigration schemes couples under 40 years old (and ages were sometimes fudged)with growing children were encouraged to immigrate. On arrival they were bound to work for a period of time. Their employers paid part of their travel costs, they were paid and after the fixed period they could work for them selves. During the time they had to work if they were careful they could save enough money for a down payment(25%) on 40 acres of land. This seemed a lot of land but in Australia was generally not enough so life was often very tough. Land was a Pound an acre. It was possible to buy land in Australia and impossible in England. During the gold rush period assisted immigration was halted. Of course lots of people paid their own way. Relations in Australia could pay to bring out their relatives. Why come to Australia? It was possible to buy land It was much warmer There was work Religious tolerance There was not a rigid class system Enough working class persons were successful to make it seem it was possible for any one to be successful. Reality was not everyone did succeed, but they did not write home. People writing home boasted of success. People writing home exaggerated success Many english plants grew vigorously in the warmer climate. Australia was a British colony (or rather a series of British colonies) Migration was encouraged, both in UK and Australia Hope this helps explain why people migrated to Australia. Elizabeth Roberts Sydney Australia

A person here in Melbourne Australia (Colin) has done a PhD on the topic - and had access to MANY records over his months / years of research that perhaps the normal person cannot get. There was active recruitment for emigration to Oz (Port Phillip District, now Victoria, in particular) agents in Cambridgeshire as well as all the factors that have been mentioned. It seems sometimes almost whole villages migrated. First one or two might go, then a few more - letters home were then published like newspapers and read around as the general populace was unable to read or write.. and so it went. Dawn (Melbourne Australia) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith & Pam Cooper Sent: Thursday, 1 February 2007 8:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMS] English History lesson >From my research, I would say that people didn't leave their homelands unless conditions were unfavourable. I have identified a number of reasons that people in Cambridgeshire looked to new lands: A great increase in the British population in the early 1800s; The cessation of the Napoleonic wars led to the importation of grain etc from Europe, bringing an economic downturn for British farmers; The introduction of mechanisation on farms brought about further job losses and led to riots; All of the above factors resulted in high unemployment in Britain; In some areas, religious differences between the Primitive Methodists and Established Church (C of E) brought further tension. The Primitive Methodists encouraged ordinary people to gain education and take leading roles within the church. The Established Church, on the other hand, liked to keep the working classes in their place. This brought physical violence in some places such as Weston Colville. Families were often divided, taking one side or the other. Those who wanted the opportunity to improve their situation, often looked to new lands. While this was happening, many states/colonies in Australia were desperate for labour due to the cessation of transportation. Immigration schemes were introduced to attract working class families. I think agents often visited villages and I know that in Buckinghamshire, there was a newspaper published specifically with immigration in mind. In Queensland, the Land Order Scheme made it possible for families to immigrate at little or no cost. Once a few had successfully immigrated, word was sent back and the floodgates opened. I often think it must have been very sad and lonely for the elderly who were generally left behind while their families forged a new life far away. Pam Cooper Qld, Australia ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sharon" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 2:52 PM Subject: [ENG-CAMS] English History lesson > Does anyone know the history of England well enough to explain to me why people were leaving England for places like South Australia and New Zealand in the 1840's and 50's? If it was for homestead land like I suspect how could they afford the cost of traveling there and how did folks in little villages get word of such land? > > Sharon > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.0.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.17/661 - Release Date: 1/30/2007 > > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.18/662 - Release Date: 31/01/2007 3:16 PM

Hello Sharon! I asked the same question and never came up with a satisfactory answer. My LAWS family immigrated in the early 1850's also. I have traced my LAWS line back to Littleport. You might find the below link on the Littleport Riots a little interesting in explaining how tough it was at the bottom of the social scale at the time. Wages were so low that people could not afford food. There were also problems with high unemployment at the time. While it is about 25 years before your suggested time period and things were somewhat better by the 1840's, many still struggled to survive. In 1845, it was the height of the Potato Famine. While it did not strike England as hard as Ireland, many Irish were flocking to England as well as other countries having an effect on wages, particularly on the low end wage jobs. http://www.btinternet.com/~strawson.online/riots/riot.htm In my families case, my gggg grandfather, Benjamin HARPER, owned 45 acres of land in Methwold, Nfk, so the family was not exactly poor. But money was raised to send three of the family men to the U.S. (including my ggg grandfather, William LAWS). They worked, established a place and sent back money to England. Over the next three years, over 30 extended family members came in three main waves (groups on a ship). The land in England was not sold until the end, so that wasn't used to finance the trip. Further, many more families from the villages they were from, came to the same area and were helped to settle. It was not uncommon for someone at the destination to pay transportation costs in exchange for a specific amount of labor, i.e. I pay your fare and you work on my farm for two years. I am not sure what the cost of transportation aboard ship was at the time, but it would be an interesting study! John Laws > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sharon > Sent: Wednesday, 31 January 2007 3:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ENG-CAMS] English History lesson > > Does anyone know the history of England well enough to explain to me why > people were leaving England for places like South Australia and New Zealand > in the 1840's and 50's? If it was for homestead land like I suspect how > could they afford the cost of traveling there and how did folks in little > villages get word of such land? > > Sharon > >

>From my research, I would say that people didn't leave their homelands unless conditions were unfavourable. I have identified a number of reasons that people in Cambridgeshire looked to new lands: A great increase in the British population in the early 1800s; The cessation of the Napoleonic wars led to the importation of grain etc from Europe, bringing an economic downturn for British farmers; The introduction of mechanisation on farms brought about further job losses and led to riots; All of the above factors resulted in high unemployment in Britain; In some areas, religious differences between the Primitive Methodists and Established Church (C of E) brought further tension. The Primitive Methodists encouraged ordinary people to gain education and take leading roles within the church. The Established Church, on the other hand, liked to keep the working classes in their place. This brought physical violence in some places such as Weston Colville. Families were often divided, taking one side or the other. Those who wanted the opportunity to improve their situation, often looked to new lands. While this was happening, many states/colonies in Australia were desperate for labour due to the cessation of transportation. Immigration schemes were introduced to attract working class families. I think agents often visited villages and I know that in Buckinghamshire, there was a newspaper published specifically with immigration in mind. In Queensland, the Land Order Scheme made it possible for families to immigrate at little or no cost. Once a few had successfully immigrated, word was sent back and the floodgates opened. I often think it must have been very sad and lonely for the elderly who were generally left behind while their families forged a new life far away. Pam Cooper Qld, Australia ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sharon" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 2:52 PM Subject: [ENG-CAMS] English History lesson > Does anyone know the history of England well enough to explain to me why people were leaving England for places like South Australia and New Zealand in the 1840's and 50's? If it was for homestead land like I suspect how could they afford the cost of traveling there and how did folks in little villages get word of such land? > > Sharon > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.0.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.17/661 - Release Date: 1/30/2007 > >

TXBLUEBONT wrote: I am new to the list and i want to find more about my Edwards ancestors my first question would be where did the Panifer come from. I found on the 1851 census . listed below how it is seen on census New Street Cambridge William EDWARDS 50 shoe maker born BOSON lincs Elizabeth dau 15 John 10 Mary A .wife 49 nurse b Suffolk Sarah A PANFOR( sic) unmarried. seamstress It looks likely that this is a second wife and all the subsequent children had the name PANIFR as a middle name 1841 MARY is a farm servant in Suffolk I then found a marriage Mary Ann PANNEFOR married Charles EDWARDS 1844 Jan qtr Warm GENE regards Margaret NOTTS UK

Hi Sharon No (or little) food at home, agriculture going into big business meaning nothing much for the individual. Attraction of the new places.. and, after early 1850s - GOLD. Australia (well some parts of it) was conducting immigration drives as they may be called now. And, the people administering the workhouses decided sensibly it was cheaper to pay for the whole family to emigrate (which involved fares and a kit for the voyage of clothes, utensils etc) than it was to support the whole lot for years at home. Put it all together and it is not at all surprising people were flocking out of England. Especially when some folk went back and said how good it was etc, and there were already in many cases family and friends here. All the best Dawn (Melbourne Australia) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sharon Sent: Wednesday, 31 January 2007 3:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [ENG-CAMS] English History lesson Does anyone know the history of England well enough to explain to me why people were leaving England for places like South Australia and New Zealand in the 1840's and 50's? If it was for homestead land like I suspect how could they afford the cost of traveling there and how did folks in little villages get word of such land? Sharon ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.16/660 - Release Date: 30/01/2007 5:04 PM

Hi Gayla, If it helps, one of my distant aunts was a Susan Edwards, born c1862 in Coton, near Cambridge. Her parents were William Edwards (b1832) and Lydia Childs (b1857). William was the son of Henry Edwards who died in 1844. My direct ancestors also hailed from Coton (having moved from Chrishall around 1860). I have a book here called "Coton through the Ages", by K Fowle. It describes the village of Coton over the years and has an entire section dedicated to the Edwards family written by a Janet Hurst, the Edwards family ran the local pub and were quite involved locally. It even comments on the fact that all the Edwards men seem to die at between the ages of 40 and 50 (!). Sorry I couldn't help directly, but there may be something in there that may help! Tony Gayla Hart wrote: > I am new to the list and i want to find more about my Edwards ancestors my first question would be where did the Panifer come from? I have no infomation about my great aunts and uncles that came to the US between 1905 and 1906 i also would like to know any thing more about the other children of James Charles and Eliza so here is my EDWARDS line is > James Charles Edwards dob-circa 1815 married Eliza Sara Ellis dob-1823 Little Abbington, Cambridgeshire, England > 1) John Edwards born Jan 7 1841 Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England Died May 31, 1919 married Nov 23, 1863 Elizabeth Sarah Charles dob 1847 Cherryhinton, Cambridgeshire, England died Dec 25, 1910 Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England daughter of James and Ann Charles > 1) James Charles Panifer Edwards dob Jun 7, 1865 Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England dod Feb 14, 1920 Monticello, San Juan, Utah, USA married Dec 24, 1826 Elizabeth Annie Mansfield dob Jul 29, 1869 Weston Coleville, Cambridgeshire, England dod Oct 22, 1961 Salt Lake City, Salt Lake, Utah, USA > a) Ellis Victor James Edwards dob Oct 15 1897 > b) Annie Elizabeth Margaret Edwards dob Jul 13, 1899 > c) Fredrick Charles John Edwards dob Apr 9, 1901 > d) Harry Richard Mansfield Edwards dob Aug 26, 1905 Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England dod Oct 30, 1968 Gladewater, Gregg, Texas, USA Married Mar 29, 1929 to Ella Lucinda Fisher dob Dec 18, 1909 dod Sep 10, 1982 daughter of Jasper and Barbara Fisher > 1) Richard Harry Edwards dob Dec 26, 1930 dod Jul 22, 1976 > 2) James Albert Edwards dob Mar 2, 1932 > 3) Max Mansfield Edwards dob Dec 11, 1936 Married June 21, 1958 Saundra Jeane Knight dob Mar 31, 1942 > a) Gayla Jan Edwards married 2 children 2 grandchildren > b) Susan Kelly Edwards divorced one child 2 grandchildren > c) Melinda Ann Edwards married 3 children 2 grandchildren > d) Phillip Mansfield Edwards married > e) Emily Elizabeth Edwards married 4 children > 4) Jack Gwinith Edwards dob Dec 14, 1937 dod Aug 17, 1980 > 5) David Leon Edwards dob Feb 20, 1940 > 6) Randy Lynn Edwards dob May 11, 1951 dod Mar 5, 1985 > e) Hugh West Edwards dob Sep 9, 1907 > f) Amy Marjorie Edwards dob Jan 10, 1910 > g) Grant Moreland Edwards dob May 26, 1912 > > 2) Ellis Panifer Edwards dob Feb 17. 1869 dod May 18, 1873 > 3) Annie Mary Elizabeth Edwards dob Jul 27, 1877 > > > --------------------------------- > Bored stiff? Loosen up... > Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >

Sharon Check out "A Short History of Australia" Ch 13 South Australia and the Wakefield Theory http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200471h.html It wasn't hard to get word out. Migration schemes were advertised in newspapers and even through the pulpit! Check out the ads for ships travelling to the colonies in any newspaper. Letters from those already in the colonies also helped to convince people to migrate. Kerrie in Sydney, Australia > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Sharon > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ENG-CAMS] English History lesson > > > Does anyone know the history of England well enough to explain to > me why people were leaving England for places like South > Australia and New Zealand in the 1840's and 50's? If it was for > homestead land like I suspect how could they afford the cost of > traveling there and how did folks in little villages get word of > such land? > > Sharon > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word > 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of > the message

There were some sponsored schemes for those on parish relief Ann----- Original Message ----- From: "Sharon" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 4:52 AM Subject: [ENG-CAMS] English History lesson was for homestead land like I suspect how could they afford the cost of traveling there and how did folks in little villages get word of such land?

Sharon: A lot of the people were sent as prisoners sentenced to transportation. Others went for the gold rush in Australia. Others went for land and probably others were organized by their pastors and their sailing fees were paid by the church. There were probably many other reasons and I think there is a new book out about the settling of Australia but you'd have to look it up on Google under that name or just Early Australia or something of that sort. Carol

Does anyone know the history of England well enough to explain to me why people were leaving England for places like South Australia and New Zealand in the 1840's and 50's? If it was for homestead land like I suspect how could they afford the cost of traveling there and how did folks in little villages get word of such land? Sharon

Hi Sharon, I suggest you talk to Marlene Williamson in New Zealand who helps with the Linton Cambs at roots web message board and has first hand experience with her family research on her excellent website http://www.rd29.net/cc/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6303901.stm? I spotted this recently on the BBC online website which eludes to the move from the laboring jobs in the countryside to cities. I am not sure myself how they got to new lives abroad in the 1800s - unless they were deported for some petty offense like cutting down a tree on the King's land or stealing some aristocrat's stock etc - but even as late as the 1950s Australia was offering the assisted passage scheme to new immigrants. My sister sailed on the P & O Canberra for something like ten pounds, I think! http://www.linton.info/newsletters.html For the past two years Garth Collard has written a feature called The Way We Were . It appears usually on page 8. One dealt with the misdemeanors and crimes in Cambs that would warrant deportation to the "colonies"! Anyone interested, as I am in Linton families, would enjoy a preview of Garth's little book, recently given to every household in Linton, but also available for purchase from him. Marlene mentioned it on the LIN-CAMS message board, after I sent her a copy. http://www.linton.info/lintoninpictures.pdf Judy (CAMBS interests DAYS in Linton, Camps, Bartlow, Ashden (Essex) and nearby villages)

I am new to the list and i want to find more about my Edwards ancestors my first question would be where did the Panifer come from? I have no infomation about my great aunts and uncles that came to the US between 1905 and 1906 i also would like to know any thing more about the other children of James Charles and Eliza so here is my EDWARDS line is James Charles Edwards dob-circa 1815 married Eliza Sara Ellis dob-1823 Little Abbington, Cambridgeshire, England 1) John Edwards born Jan 7 1841 Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England Died May 31, 1919 married Nov 23, 1863 Elizabeth Sarah Charles dob 1847 Cherryhinton, Cambridgeshire, England died Dec 25, 1910 Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England daughter of James and Ann Charles 1) James Charles Panifer Edwards dob Jun 7, 1865 Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England dod Feb 14, 1920 Monticello, San Juan, Utah, USA married Dec 24, 1826 Elizabeth Annie Mansfield dob Jul 29, 1869 Weston Coleville, Cambridgeshire, England dod Oct 22, 1961 Salt Lake City, Salt Lake, Utah, USA a) Ellis Victor James Edwards dob Oct 15 1897 b) Annie Elizabeth Margaret Edwards dob Jul 13, 1899 c) Fredrick Charles John Edwards dob Apr 9, 1901 d) Harry Richard Mansfield Edwards dob Aug 26, 1905 Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England dod Oct 30, 1968 Gladewater, Gregg, Texas, USA Married Mar 29, 1929 to Ella Lucinda Fisher dob Dec 18, 1909 dod Sep 10, 1982 daughter of Jasper and Barbara Fisher 1) Richard Harry Edwards dob Dec 26, 1930 dod Jul 22, 1976 2) James Albert Edwards dob Mar 2, 1932 3) Max Mansfield Edwards dob Dec 11, 1936 Married June 21, 1958 Saundra Jeane Knight dob Mar 31, 1942 a) Gayla Jan Edwards married 2 children 2 grandchildren b) Susan Kelly Edwards divorced one child 2 grandchildren c) Melinda Ann Edwards married 3 children 2 grandchildren d) Phillip Mansfield Edwards married e) Emily Elizabeth Edwards married 4 children 4) Jack Gwinith Edwards dob Dec 14, 1937 dod Aug 17, 1980 5) David Leon Edwards dob Feb 20, 1940 6) Randy Lynn Edwards dob May 11, 1951 dod Mar 5, 1985 e) Hugh West Edwards dob Sep 9, 1907 f) Amy Marjorie Edwards dob Jan 10, 1910 g) Grant Moreland Edwards dob May 26, 1912 2) Ellis Panifer Edwards dob Feb 17. 1869 dod May 18, 1873 3) Annie Mary Elizabeth Edwards dob Jul 27, 1877 --------------------------------- Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.

Hello All: This is what I pulled from the Doddington Parish Registers some time ago - LDS FHL Film 1040458: marr 31.12.1682 John BARNES & Mary AVERSLEY marr 15.10.1685 John BARNES & Elizabeth EATON bur 13.8.1686 Mary the wife of John BARNES bur 18.6.1686 Elizabeth d/o of John BARNES bap 29.1.1687/8 Alice d/o Julia BARNES marr 5.6.1688 Richard BARNES & Jane HILLS bap 8.11.1690 Margaret d/o John BARNES bur 25.12.1691 Margaret d/o John BARNES bap 8.1.1692/3 Mary dau of John BARNES bur 17.6.1696 John BARNES bap 13.12.1696 Mary d/o John BARNES, posthumous bur 29.4.1698 Mary BARNES marr 23.8.1698 John CLOUGH and Elizabeth BARNES bur 9.5.1703 John BARNES marr 15.8.1732 Gabriel GREEN & Essie? BARNES - stranger bap 25.7.1735 Ann d/o William BARNES of Doddington bap 28.1.1738 Mary d/o Thomas BARNES of Benwick bur 25.11.1738 Thomas s/o Thomas BARNES of Benwick bur 17.8.1739 A stranger from William BARNES bap 24.8.1740 Eleanor d/o William BARNES, Doddington bap 24.11.1741 Thomas s/o Thomas BARNES, baptized privately, Benwick bap 12.9.1742 William s/o William BARNES, Benwick bap 27.11.1743 James s/o Thomas BARNES, Benwick bur 30.12.1743 William BARNES, Doddington bap 25.7.1746 Mary d/o Thomas BARNES, Benwick bur 24.7.1747 Eleanor BARNES, a child, Doddington bur 13.5.1751 Mary d/o Thomas BARNES, Drowned, Benwick bap 4.8.1754 Mary d/o John BARNES, Benwick bap 10.9.1758 Elizabeth d/o John BARNS, Wimblington marr 26.10.1758 John BARNS and Ann SPRAGGIN bur 7.12.1758 Elizabeth wife of Thomas BARNES, Benwick bap 20.9.1761 John s/o John BARNS, Wimblington Sorry not doing lookups Carol

>From LDS FHL Film 1040455 - Doddington, Cambridgeshire continued: bap 14.3.1762 John s/o John BARNS of Ramsey Fen bur 23.8.1764 Smith d/o ye late Thomas BARNS, Benwick bur 9.1.1766 John BARNS, Benwick bap 24.10.1772 William s/o Francis and Mary BARNES, Doddington marr 25.9.1775 George FRANKLIN and Jane BARNES, Benwick bur 3.11.1775 James BARNES, Blacksmith, of Benwick bap 14.4.1776 Francis s/o Francis and Mary BARNES,Welches Dam bur 20.12.1776 Francis s/o Francis & Mary BARNES, Welches Dam marr 29.7.1778 William BARNES and Sarah FINCH, Banns bur 30.11.1779 Jane the widow of John BARNES, Benwick bur 28.8.1780 Sarah the wife of John BARNES, Benwick marr 26.10.1780 William FISHER and Elizabeth BARNES, Banns marr 3.12.1780 John BARNS and Margaret BROWN, Banns marr 28.3.1784 Thomas BARNES and Susannah GREEN, Benwick bap 22.8.1784 Mary d/o Thomas and Mary BARNS, Benwick bur 20.6.1786 William s/o John & Margaret BARNES, Benwick bap 7.9.1788 James s/o Thomas & Susan BARNS, Pauper, Benwick bur 14.5.1792 Susannah d/o Thomas BARNES, Pauper, Benwick bur 18.11.1794 William BARNES, Farmer, Welches Dam bur 11.4.1796 Smith d/o Thomas BARNS, Benwick bap 15.4.1798 Jeremiah s/o Jeremiah & Eleanor BARNES, Benwick bur 20.4.1798 Mary wife of Francis BARNS, Welches Dam bap 10.3.1805 Ann d/o Francis & Jane BARNES, Welches Dam bap 4.1.1807 Eleanor d/o Francis & Jane BARNS, Welches Dam bur 2.4.1809 William BARNES, Welches Dam bur 7.1.1810 Eleanor d/o Francis BARNS, Welches Dam bur 17.12.1811 Francis BARNS from Welches Dam bap #550 14.5.1826 Thomas s/o Thomas and Mary BARNS bap #639 21.12.1828 John s/o Thomas & Elizabeth BARNS, Benwick Labourer bap #1416 21.3.1841 George s/o Fisher & Elizabeth BARNES, Benwick Labourer bap #1553 25.6.1843 Thomas s/o James & Caroline BARNES Benwick Labourer bap #1600 18.2.1844 Joseph s/o Joseph & Ann BARNES, Chatteris Union, Labourer Sorry, not doing lookups. Carol