Nowhere near! In 1871 they were (wait for it . . .) in Sevenoaks, Kent. Thomas Coleman 49 b "Forweston" (sic) BKM Mary Ann wife 49 b Whitfield NTH William son 15 b Turweston BKM Mary Ellen dau 11 b Turweston BKM Ancestry.com really have a problem with their indexing, don't they? BTW, there was also a Thomas Coleman 25 b Turweston, still in Turweston. Wife Eliza, 29, b Whitfield. Children George 7, Whitfield; Elizth, 6, Brackley; William, 3, Turweston,; Mary Ann 2 weeks, Turweston. Another son? Paul Glen Alderson wrote: >Would SKS please do a lookup in the 1861 and/or 1871 census for a Thomas Coleman. In the 1881 census Thomas is at Brackley Northampton. Thomas (age58 in 1881) and son William (age 22 in 1881) births are shown as Turweston Bucks. Thomas's wife Mary Ann (age 58 in 1881) birth is Whitfield Northampton. In 1881 a grandson James Wallace (age 14) is living with Thomas and family. James birth is at Brackley. I supect that the family was still in the Brackley area in 1861 and 1871 census. >Glen Alderson >Calgary Alberta > > >============================== >Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the >last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.2 - Release Date: 04/03/05

Thank you very much Paul. The Thomas in Turweston could be a son. All I had was the son William which is the one that goes on and marries an Amelia Gulliver and has a daughter Alice that marries in to the Alderson family. Glen Alderson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Irving" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 3:16 PM Subject: Re: [ENG-BUCK] 1861/1871 Census lookup > Nowhere near! In 1871 they were (wait for it . . .) in Sevenoaks, Kent. > > Thomas Coleman 49 b "Forweston" (sic) BKM > Mary Ann wife 49 b Whitfield NTH > William son 15 b Turweston BKM > Mary Ellen dau 11 b Turweston BKM > > Ancestry.com really have a problem with their indexing, don't they? > > BTW, there was also a Thomas Coleman 25 b Turweston, still in Turweston. > Wife Eliza, 29, b Whitfield. Children George 7, Whitfield; Elizth, 6, > Brackley; William, 3, Turweston,; Mary Ann 2 weeks, Turweston. Another > son? > > Paul > > > Glen Alderson wrote: > >>Would SKS please do a lookup in the 1861 and/or 1871 census for a Thomas >>Coleman. In the 1881 census Thomas is at Brackley Northampton. Thomas >>(age58 in 1881) and son William (age 22 in 1881) births are shown as >>Turweston Bucks. Thomas's wife Mary Ann (age 58 in 1881) birth is >>Whitfield Northampton. In 1881 a grandson James Wallace (age 14) is living >>with Thomas and family. James birth is at Brackley. I supect that the >>family was still in the Brackley area in 1861 and 1871 census. >>Glen Alderson >>Calgary Alberta >> >> >>============================== >>Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the >>last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: >>http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.2 - Release Date: 04/03/05 > > > ============================== > Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for > ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx > >

Unfortunately not. I just did what I should have done at first, & checked the 1851 census. Thomas (b abt 1846) was the son of George. The only candidate for your Thomas in Bucks in 1851 is wither a bit young, or there's a mistake in the transcription. I favour the latter, taking into account the ages of his children. A 9 could be mistaken for a 4, especially since the age column was the one most favoured for enumerators marks - Turweston - piece 1735 folio 256 sched 0043 Thomas COLEMAN wid 24(??) b Turweston Ag Lab John son 9 do Ann dau 7 do Edmund son 4 do Elizabeth dau 2 do Find him in the 1861 census with some of those children & some of the younger ones, & I think it'll be definite. The 1861 BGS transcription is due out any day now (but has been for months). It'd better turn up soon: I paid for it last August. When it does, you should get more answers. Paul Glen Alderson wrote: > Thank you very much Paul. The Thomas in Turweston could be a son. All > I had was the son William which is the one that goes on and marries an > Amelia Gulliver and has a daughter Alice that marries in to the > Alderson family. > > Glen Alderson > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Irving" > <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 3:16 PM > Subject: Re: [ENG-BUCK] 1861/1871 Census lookup > > >> Nowhere near! In 1871 they were (wait for it . . .) in Sevenoaks, Kent. >> >> Thomas Coleman 49 b "Forweston" (sic) BKM >> Mary Ann wife 49 b Whitfield NTH >> William son 15 b Turweston BKM >> Mary Ellen dau 11 b Turweston BKM >> >> Ancestry.com really have a problem with their indexing, don't they? >> >> BTW, there was also a Thomas Coleman 25 b Turweston, still in >> Turweston. Wife Eliza, 29, b Whitfield. Children George 7, Whitfield; >> Elizth, 6, Brackley; William, 3, Turweston,; Mary Ann 2 weeks, >> Turweston. Another son? >> >> Paul >> >> >> Glen Alderson wrote: >> >>> Would SKS please do a lookup in the 1861 and/or 1871 census for a >>> Thomas Coleman. In the 1881 census Thomas is at Brackley >>> Northampton. Thomas (age58 in 1881) and son William (age 22 in 1881) >>> births are shown as Turweston Bucks. Thomas's wife Mary Ann (age 58 >>> in 1881) birth is Whitfield Northampton. In 1881 a grandson James >>> Wallace (age 14) is living with Thomas and family. James birth is at >>> Brackley. I supect that the family was still in the Brackley area in >>> 1861 and 1871 census. >>> Glen Alderson >>> Calgary Alberta >>> >>> >>> ============================== >>> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the >>> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: >>> http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.2 - Release Date: 04/03/05 >> >> >> ============================== >> Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for >> ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: >> http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx >> >> > > > > ============================== > New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your > ancestors at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. > Learn more: > http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429 > > > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.2 - Release Date: 04/03/05