Sorry List, I'm resending this as I got no response. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Watson" <bwatson@sisna.com> To: <ENG-BANBURY-AREA-L@rootsweb.com>; <LindaG8474@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 1:31 PM Subject: Re: [BAN] WALKER / WHITE > Hi Linda, > > This is the only message that has come through from Banbury list for awhile. > I see that I've missed some. I have checked 1861 Census & found family. > Found both marr. in Banbury & bapt of children listed in census. > > Do you have this? I have to run to work, but can send it tomorrow. I'm > sending this onlist & to you off list. > > Regards, > > Bill Watson > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <LindaG8474@aol.com> > To: <ENG-BANBURY-AREA-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 3:16 PM > Subject: [BAN] WALKER / WHITE > > > > Thanks, Angela. > > The bible entries say Frederick's parents were William Walker & > Elizabeth > > White. The marriage certificate my cousin got shows Frederick's father > as > > James Deeming Walker. I'm confused. > > A possibility: William Walker married Mary Ann Randle in 1842. Mary Ann > > died in December 1858. William remarried in June 1859 to Elizabeth > White. > > The only problem is Frederick was born in January 1859??? > > OR did Mary Ann have Frederick in Dec 1858 and died in childbirth. > > Birth not recorded until Jan 1859. Then Wm married Elizabeth & she > raised her > > stepson as her own??? > > Is that possible? > > But then why is Frederick's father listed as James on marriage cert? > > OR this William is no relation and I need to go back and restart. > > At least you've given me some directions for further research. > > Linda > > > > > > > > ============================== > > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration > > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more. > > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237 > > > > >