Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 4/4
    1. [BAN] Family bibles
    2. Eryl Bloxham
    3. I wonder if we might have a section on family details recorded in family bibles. Very often family bibles are passed out of the family, I have seen them at auctions. These details are a tresure trove for family historians and may be of little interest to the present owners. Eryl

    10/11/2007 11:47:10
    1. Re: [BAN] Family bibles
    2. Angela Allen
    3. I'll second you on that good idea Eryl. Rosemary has final say re web site contribution. Only fair as R knows how much work may be involved. Angela >I wonder if we might have a section on family details recorded in family >bibles. Very often family bibles are passed out of the family, I have seen >them at auctions. These details are a tresure trove for family historians >and may be of little interest to the present owners. Eryl

    10/11/2007 01:05:44
    1. Re: [BAN] Family bibles
    2. Carole
    3. Hi A relative took photos of our family bible, which there is no way I was ever going to get to see as it was on the other side of the world. I'm glad she did, because I was able to verify details my grandmother had copied out for me many years ago, and spot a few things she had not gotten quite right. This in turn helped out track down a few folk that I had not been able to sort out. It was also interesting to see that there were a few other comments on the pages that Nan had not thought important, but added to the whole picture for me. Carole -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eryl Bloxham Sent: Friday, 12 October 2007 5:47 a.m. To: BANBURY Subject: [BAN] Family bibles I wonder if we might have a section on family details recorded in family bibles. Very often family bibles are passed out of the family, I have seen them at auctions. These details are a tresure trove for family historians and may be of little interest to the present owners. Eryl ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The online Northamptonshire marriage strays index has just been updated. Now nearly 7,000 marriages are included. View them at http://www.northants1841.fsnet.co.uk/northants%20strays.htm ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.6/1061 - Release Date: 10/10/2007 8:43 a.m.

    10/12/2007 02:24:41
    1. Re: [BAN] Family bibles
    2. Rosemary Probert
    3. Hi Eryl & friends, I like the idea of a section on the website for family bibles. A few immediate thoughts: 1. Transcript of the entries would be needed. Screen readers & Google can't "read" text on images & photos. You can send these to me in an email or as a 'word' attachment. Don't send them to the list. 2. Photograph/s or scan/s would be a bonus - even a photograph of the bible itself. Please send large images - then I can edit them down to fit the page 3. Extra information can be added about the family if you have any. 4. Contact name & address. I do add brackets around the email addresses on the site - it seems to stop spam bots from picking up these addresses. 5. I am quite happy to add *any* family bible - it doesn't have to be directly related to Banburyshire. 6. Any questions? The site is designed for sharing - so share what you have - you never know who might find it - it might be just the person who can break down your brickwall! Rosemary Northumberland UK Email: [email protected] Banburyshire Website: http://www.rootsweb.com/~engcbanb/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> Eryl Bloxham wrote: > I wonder if we might have a section on family details recorded in > family bibles. Very often family bibles are passed out of the > family, I have seen them at auctions. These details are a tresure > trove for family historians and may be of little interest to the > present owners. Eryl

    10/12/2007 04:31:55