Hi all. Just discovered a new branch in the family....Mary Ann Franklin married Richard Spencer June quarter 1856 Middleton Cheney (registered Banbury) Is anyone researching Spencers in this area and would anyone have this Richard or their children on their radar?))) Brenda avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS) avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com
Hi Brenda, 25 May 1856 Richard SPENCER full age bach lab Middleton Cheney s. Matthew baker Mary AnnFRANKLIN full age spin Middleton Cheney d Richard lab OFHS 1861 Middleton Cheney RG9/919 folio 38 SPENCER Richard Head Mar 34 Railway Lab NTH Middleton Cheney " Mary A Wife Mar 38 " " " " William Son 14 Ag Lab " " " " Samuel Son 7 Scholar " " " " Richard Son 4 " " " " " Charles Son 1 " " " LOCK Mary Aunt Un 70 " " " OFHS 1851 Middleton Cheney HO107/1734 folio 253 SPENCER Matthew HD w 73 Pauper OXF Adderbury " Richard SO u 30 Ag Lab NTH Middleton Cheney LOCK Mary LG u 59 Pauper " " " bapt; 17 Mar 1821 SPENCER Richard s Matthew & Bety baker priv. - rec'd 12 Jun 17 Feb 1824 FRANKLIN Mary Anne d Richard & Mary lab " " 2 Jan 1825 13 Sep 1846 " William s Mary single woman 24 Dec 1854 " Samuel s Mary Anne single woman 28 Sep 1856 SPENCER Richard s Richard & Mary Ann lab 30 Oct 1859 " Charles s " Mary " 1 Oct 1862 " Thomas s " Mary Anne " privately. present - mother, ? GRANT, Mary LOCK, Emma FRANKLIN. received Whitsunday 1872 30 Oct 1870 SPENCER Charlotte d Richard & Mary railway lab HTH, Bill Watson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bren" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 8:00 PM Subject: [BAN] SPENCER and FRANKLIN > Hi all. Just discovered a new branch in the family....Mary Ann Franklin > married Richard Spencer June quarter 1856 Middleton Cheney (registered > Banbury) > > Is anyone researching Spencers in this area and would anyone have this > Richard or their children on their radar?))) > > Brenda > > avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. > Virus Database (VPS) > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software. > http://www.avast.com > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > http://www.british-history.ac.uk/ > British History Online > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Fantastic Bill, just great. Thank you so much for talking the trouble to look all of this up. So the two older boys were indeed Franklins...but they were noted as Spencer on later census and so likely their families have that name today. This I don't understand: 1 Oct 1862 " Thomas s " Mary Anne " > privately. present - mother, ? GRANT, Mary LOCK, Emma FRANKLIN. received > Whitsunday 1872 Are you saying that Thomas Spenceer son of Richard and Mary Ann was privately baptised in 1862...and that present at the baptism was a _____ Grant and the Aunt, Mary Lock, and that Emma Franklin was received on Whitsunday 1872? Mary Anne had a sister Emma Franklin born abt. 1818. Does "received" mean a late baptism or a confirmation or??? What a great help, thank you for all that..more than I expected to receive. Sincerely, Brenda ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Watson" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 3:06 PM Subject: Re: [BAN] SPENCER and FRANKLIN > Hi Brenda, > > 25 May 1856 Richard SPENCER full age bach lab Middleton Cheney s. Matthew > baker > Mary AnnFRANKLIN full age spin Middleton Cheney d > Richard > lab > > OFHS 1861 Middleton Cheney RG9/919 folio 38 > SPENCER Richard Head Mar 34 Railway Lab NTH Middleton Cheney > " Mary A Wife Mar 38 " > " > " > " William Son 14 Ag Lab " > " > " > " Samuel Son 7 Scholar " > " " > " Richard Son 4 " " > " " > " Charles Son 1 " > " " > LOCK Mary Aunt Un 70 " " > " > > OFHS 1851 Middleton Cheney HO107/1734 folio 253 > SPENCER Matthew HD w 73 Pauper OXF Adderbury > " Richard SO u 30 Ag Lab NTH Middleton Cheney > LOCK Mary LG u 59 Pauper " " " > > bapt; > 17 Mar 1821 SPENCER Richard s Matthew & Bety baker priv. - rec'd 12 Jun > 17 Feb 1824 FRANKLIN Mary Anne d Richard & Mary lab " " 2 Jan > 1825 > 13 Sep 1846 " William s Mary single woman > 24 Dec 1854 " Samuel s Mary Anne single woman > 28 Sep 1856 SPENCER Richard s Richard & Mary Ann lab > 30 Oct 1859 " Charles s " Mary " > 1 Oct 1862 " Thomas s " Mary Anne " > privately. present - mother, ? GRANT, Mary LOCK, Emma FRANKLIN. received > Whitsunday 1872 > 30 Oct 1870 SPENCER Charlotte d Richard & Mary railway lab > > HTH, > > Bill Watson > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bren" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 8:00 PM > Subject: [BAN] SPENCER and FRANKLIN > > >> Hi all. Just discovered a new branch in the family....Mary Ann Franklin >> married Richard Spencer June quarter 1856 Middleton Cheney (registered >> Banbury) >> >> Is anyone researching Spencers in this area and would anyone have this >> Richard or their children on their radar?))) >> >> Brenda >> >> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. >> Virus Database (VPS) >> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software. >> http://www.avast.com >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> http://www.british-history.ac.uk/ >> British History Online >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without >> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > http://www.british-history.ac.uk/ > British History Online > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Yes, Mary Ann (the mother), ___ Grant, Mary Lock, & Emma Franklin were present at Thomas' private baptism. He must have been doing poorly when born. Thomas got better and was received into church on Whitsunday (whatever holiday or date this is) 1872. That is what is noted on his entry. 10 years later??? a year after his sister was baptised (not private, so must have been in church) This is the first time I've seen the names listed. The clerk must have wanted to know who witnessed the baptism for some reason. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bren" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 6:40 PM Subject: Re: [BAN] SPENCER and FRANKLIN > Fantastic Bill, just great. Thank you so much for talking the trouble to > look all of this up. So the two older boys were indeed Franklins...but > they > were noted as Spencer on later census and so likely their families have > that > name today. > > This I don't understand: > > 1 Oct 1862 " Thomas s " Mary Anne " >> privately. present - mother, ? GRANT, Mary LOCK, Emma FRANKLIN. received >> Whitsunday 1872 > > Are you saying that Thomas Spenceer son of Richard and Mary Ann was > privately baptised in 1862...and that present at the baptism was a _____ > Grant and the Aunt, Mary Lock, and that Emma Franklin was received on > Whitsunday 1872? Mary Anne had a sister Emma Franklin born abt. 1818. > Does > "received" mean a late baptism or a confirmation or??? > > What a great help, thank you for all that..more than I expected to > receive. > > Sincerely, > Brenda > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Watson" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 3:06 PM > Subject: Re: [BAN] SPENCER and FRANKLIN > > >> Hi Brenda, >> >> 25 May 1856 Richard SPENCER full age bach lab Middleton Cheney s. Matthew >> baker >> Mary AnnFRANKLIN full age spin Middleton Cheney d >> Richard >> lab >> >> OFHS 1861 Middleton Cheney RG9/919 folio 38 >> SPENCER Richard Head Mar 34 Railway Lab NTH Middleton Cheney >> " Mary A Wife Mar 38 " >> " >> " >> " William Son 14 Ag Lab " >> " >> " >> " Samuel Son 7 Scholar " >> " " >> " Richard Son 4 " " >> " " >> " Charles Son 1 " >> " " >> LOCK Mary Aunt Un 70 " " >> " >> >> OFHS 1851 Middleton Cheney HO107/1734 folio 253 >> SPENCER Matthew HD w 73 Pauper OXF Adderbury >> " Richard SO u 30 Ag Lab NTH Middleton Cheney >> LOCK Mary LG u 59 Pauper " " " >> >> bapt; >> 17 Mar 1821 SPENCER Richard s Matthew & Bety baker priv. - rec'd 12 Jun >> 17 Feb 1824 FRANKLIN Mary Anne d Richard & Mary lab " " 2 Jan >> 1825 >> 13 Sep 1846 " William s Mary single woman >> 24 Dec 1854 " Samuel s Mary Anne single woman >> 28 Sep 1856 SPENCER Richard s Richard & Mary Ann lab >> 30 Oct 1859 " Charles s " Mary " >> 1 Oct 1862 " Thomas s " Mary Anne " >> privately. present - mother, ? GRANT, Mary LOCK, Emma FRANKLIN. received >> Whitsunday 1872 >> 30 Oct 1870 SPENCER Charlotte d Richard & Mary railway lab >> >> HTH, >> >> Bill Watson >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Bren" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 8:00 PM >> Subject: [BAN] SPENCER and FRANKLIN >> >> >>> Hi all. Just discovered a new branch in the family....Mary Ann Franklin >>> married Richard Spencer June quarter 1856 Middleton Cheney (registered >>> Banbury) >>> >>> Is anyone researching Spencers in this area and would anyone have this >>> Richard or their children on their radar?))) >>> >>> Brenda >>> >>> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. >>> Virus Database (VPS) >>> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software. >>> http://www.avast.com >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> http://www.british-history.ac.uk/ >>> British History Online >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' >>> without >>> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> http://www.british-history.ac.uk/ >> British History Online >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without >> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > http://www.british-history.ac.uk/ > British History Online > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message