I think that all Ellis info should be shared. Linda H. -----Original Message----- From: Iris Wagoner <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, April 07, 1999 5:00 PM Subject: Re: [ELLIS-L] communication >There are so many Ellis lines. I wish each would indicate their lines >origin. Some of these lines are very confusing. > Iris Ellis Wagoner >-----Original Message----- >From: John D. Armstrong <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >Date: Wednesday, April 07, 1999 2:57 PM >Subject: Re: [ELLIS-L] communication > > >>In response to Bob and Joan's comments.. if it's up to a vote.. >>I vote that the genealogy information be shared, with the whole list.... >>One never knows when or where the next clue may come from.... >> >>I once made the sorry mistake of concentrating my research to a small >>narrow, specific geographical area... only to learn much later that I'd >>deleted a lot of distant family.... >> >>Sincerely, >>John Armstrong >>Homer, Alaska >> >> >> >>Sincerely, >>John D. Armstrong >>Homer, Alaska >> >> >> >>Ellis wrote: >> >>> Thank you for bringing this up. I have been on the list for a year and I >love >>> seeing everything go through the list. You never know when it might help >>> someone out here in cyberland find that missing link. Well, I have >several >>> missing links, so please post to the list. >>> Joan Ellis >>> >>> Bob Ellis wrote: >>> >>> > Dear pleasant folk interested in Ellis descendents; >>> > >>> > I posted a query just last night and have already received a number of >>> > informative replies. However, they were each sent to me by direct mail >and >>> > not to the list. I replied directly. Thinking about it though, how >does >>> > one share info among the list if all the communication is one on one. >Is >>> > there a protocol or certain types of messages that are shared with the >list >>> > and other types that are shared with just the individual sending a >comment? >>> > >>> > I'm new to this geneology list business and plead ignorance to the >protocol >>> > but am open to education. >>> > >>> > thanks in advance for your indulgence of my ignorance :-) >>> > >>> > Bob >> >> > >