Thanks LeaMarie for voicing my feelings and probably those of others as well. Edward On 12 January 2014 08:00, <dyfed-request@rootsweb.com> wrote: > > > Please delete any irrelevant notes when replying to this digest. > > Today's Topics: > > 3. Re: DYFED Digest, Vol 9, Issue 7 (LeaMarie Robertson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 00:48:07 -0600 > From: LeaMarie Robertson <leamarrob@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Dyfed] DYFED Digest, Vol 9, Issue 7 > To: dyfed@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: > < > CABWV7sh_Vy2NShbfQTjPS2R8eS+t76Z_n5amdDgF+KmJFaZEiA@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I'm embarrassed by the response posted to Hal McCawley. This has been such > a friendly and helpful list which is one of the reasons I believe it has > remained so active in the past. I know that Rhodri is one of the listers > who have been very helpful to many people. I have received so much > assistance, at time asking questions that probably seem ignorant beyond > measure to some people who are more experienced than I am or who live in > the UK and therefore understand cultural and physical layout etc. better > than I do. I appreciate the incredible patience that people have had with > me. I have more than likely repeated posts when coming back to things or > from having such a bulk of information I was looking for. Mr. McCawley > said "suggestions greatly appreciated". Maybe he hoped for a different > suggestion? If Mr. McCawley repeated a question, maybe he didn't > understand the answer, maybe he was hoping for some different input from > someone, maybe he didn't understand the input, maybe he printed it out and > his cat ate it or his teen-age son deleted it or.... Since we don't have > any idea why, I'd like to extend to him the benefit of the doubt that he is > still needing the information and if we don't understand why, kindly ask > him. It's just so much more pleasant that way for everybody in my personal > opinion. > > > > >