At 03:33 PM 09/06/1999 -0500, I wrote: >Hi, Duttons, Duntons, and others: > > I have on occasion mentioned the only source I have encountered that might > support a connection between Susannah(ca.1626-1684), wife of Thomas Dutton > (ca.1619-1686/7), with any Palmer. It is in the last line of Barbara > Palmer's will, proved 10 June 1651, below. I have also provided one other > will, that of her husband, for additional family relationships. > > Please note that I do *NOT* claim that this is any kind of proof that "our" > Susannah Dutton was born a Palmer. In fact, her will can, as easily as not, > be read to make the mentioned Susannah a part of Barbara Palmer's birth > family (possibly Combe), and not a Palmer at all. [snip] Hi, everybody: In reviewing my own last message, I failed to make explicit that the "Susanna Dutten" in Barbara Palmer's will: 1. May not even have lived in New England. 2. Is not connected with any specific husband. 3. May conceivably have been *born* a Dutton. Darrell Darrell A. Martin formerly of the Dutton District, Springfield, Vermont currently in exile in Addison, Illinois darrellm@sprynet.com