Hi Richard, Yes, all the chidren whose baptisms were found came to New Netherland, except Abraham. I don’t think an exact date is known for their move to the new world. The last date they’ve been found in New Amsterdam so far is the baptism of daughter Tryntje on 8 June 1636. The first date they were definitely in New Netherland is 16 April 1643 when “Hendrick Hendricksen Kyp” witnessed a settlement by Gertruyt Jacobs on her children – New York Historical Manuscripts: Dutch; Vol. II, Register of the Provincial Secretary 1642 – 1647; Translated by Arnold J. F. van Laer (1974), pp. 115 – 116 [original document # 51c]. Then on 19 April 1643 “Mr. Hendrick Hendricksz.” bp. daughter Femmetje at the NA RDC. The lone witness was Jsac Hendrickszen – possibly his son, who would have been 16. On 28 April 1643, “Hendrick Hendricksz Kip” was granted a lot in New Amsterdam located east of the fort -- New York Historical Manuscripts: Dutch; Volumes GG, HH, & II, Land Papers, Translated and Edited by Charles Gehring (1980); p. 17 [original document #GG 57]. On 24 Oct 1643, he signed (as Hendrick Hendricksen Kyp) a resolution adopted by the commonality of the Manhattans – Documents Relative to the Colonial History of the State of New-York ... ed. by E. B. O’Callaghan, vol 1, pp. 191-192. On the Manatus map of 1639 there are two plantations shown as belonging to a tailor (snyder). One is #25 shown belonging to Hendric de Snyder and the other is #45 shown simply as Plan. van snyder. #25 is at the southern end in or near New Amsterdam; #45 is way up north in what became Harlem. I. N. Phelps Stokes in his Iconography of Manhattan Island ... vol 2, pp. 197-198 traces land records that appear to show that #25 belonged to Hendrick Janszen, a tailor who was known to be in New Amsterdam as early as 1638. As to #45, Stokes was not able to tell to whom it belonged (vol. 2, p. 205). Frederic E. Kip in his History of the Kip Family in America (1928) says that the “van Snyder” of #45 “undoubtedly refers to Hendrick Kip” (p. 23). However, later on that same page he says “Possibly Hendrick Kip’s earliest residence in Manhattan was on this plantation in New Harlem.” However, I am skeptical because that would mean he was in New Netherland for four years without leaving any records – especially since he seems to have been a man of substance: He was a Great Burgher and was chosen to be one of the Nine Men, for example. After 1643 there are many records left by him. So, it seems to me the best we can say is that the family arrived some time between 1636 and 1643. Regards, Howard hswain@ix.netcom.com From: RichardAHayes@bex.net Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 5:04 AM To: new-netherland@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [NEW-NETHERLAND] Hendrick Hendricksz Kip Hi Cor, The information about Hendrick Hendricksz Kip and his family was interesting because he and his wife are my 9th great grandparents. My line goes thru their son Jacob. Did all of the children except Abraham come to America? Do you know when? Richard

For those of you who know of the Zabriskie Books (sorry I dont have a link) they also have Kipp, Kip and Xip (unusual spelling) in those books. Just an FYI. Happy hunting, Sharon On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:01 AM, <dutch-colonies-request@rootsweb.com>wrote: > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Hendrick Hendricksz Kip (ekipp@rogers.com) > 2. Surnames (Sue Christensen) > 3. Re: Surnames (James Harder) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: ekipp@rogers.com > To: "Dutch-Colonies-L@rootsweb.com" <Dutch-Colonies-L@rootsweb.com> > Cc: > Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:49:33 -0800 (PST) > Subject: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Hendrick Hendricksz Kip > Further to the post by Cor, you can find many details about this family at > the following web sites. > http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=edwkipp8 > > http://www.kipp-blake-families.ca/kipfam.htm > > Regards > Edward Kipp > > From the banks of the Ottawa River, river of the voyageurs! > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Sue Christensen <suemeadowbrook@yahoo.com> > To: "DUTCH-COLONIES@rootsweb.com" <DUTCH-COLONIES@rootsweb.com> > Cc: > Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 06:01:39 -0800 (PST) > Subject: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Surnames > Are there clues to tell if a surname is of Dutch colonial origin versus > from the Palatine/German immigrations? How often were there intermarriages > between the two groups in the 1700's? > > > Before my mother infected me with the genealogical sleuth bug, I always > thought we were English and Dutch. Lo and behold, tracing those female > lines, once you can find the maiden name, leads to many surprises. I am > primarily looking in New York state. > > > My known lines are Terpening/ Terwilliger, Beem, Degraff, Shutts,Hooglandt > and associated lines, Dingman, Rouw, Swartout, Gardenier, Van Valkenburgh, > Yates, Vandenburg, Coppernoll and many other maternal line feeders. > > Sue > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: James Harder <jaharder88@yahoo.com> > To: Sue Christensen <suemeadowbrook@yahoo.com>, " > dutch-colonies@rootsweb.com" <dutch-colonies@rootsweb.com> > Cc: > Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:34:17 -0800 (PST) > Subject: Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Surnames > Hi Sue, > > There are resources for identifying surnames and early > family origins: > For Dutch era surnames: David M. Riker's Genealogical and biographical > directory to > persons in New Netherland, from 1613 to 1674 > For New York Palatines: Henry Z. Jones’ Palatine Families of > New York 1710, and other volumes in his series. > > Marriages between the Palatine Germans and the > earlier families occurred from the time the Germans arrived and increased > among those > born in New York in later generations. It's unusual to find families with > Dutch era roots that don't have Palatine intermarriages. > > From the surnames you mention, I assume you’ve reached > either Jacob or Gerrit Terpenning, who married Annatje and Maria Beem. > Jones identifies the daughters of Joh. > Albert Beem, a 1710 immigrant with his father Henrich Bohm (Hunter #63). > Some of their records from the Kingston > Ref. Church which confirm the placement: > > 1721 > 07 Apr; Hendrik Beem, wid Maria Appel, born Germany; Juliana _. (banns) > > 1721 > 23 Aug; Albert Beem; Margrietjen Beeshaaren, both born Germany, both liv > Kingstown. > (with ill. child) > > 1721 > Aug 27; Albert Beem, Margrietjen Beesharen; Marytjen; Jan Oet, Hillegonda > Slegtenaar > > 1728 > Feb 11; Albert Been, Grietjen Peeshaar; Anna; Willem Douwdie, Anna Beem > > 1746 > 25 May; Jacob Teerpenning, jm, born New Paltz liv Kingston; Marreitje Bem, > jd, > of Kingston. > > 1750 > 20 Sep; Gerret Teerpenning, jm, born New Palz liv Kingston; Annaatje Beem, > jd, > of Kingston. > > 1752 > Apr 12; Gerret Teerpenning, Annaatje Bem; Margriet; Albert Bem & wife > Margriet Beesharen > > Jim > > > ________________________________ > From: Sue Christensen <suemeadowbrook@yahoo.com> > To: "DUTCH-COLONIES@rootsweb.com" <DUTCH-COLONIES@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 9:01 AM > Subject: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Surnames > > Are there clues to tell if a surname is of Dutch colonial origin versus > from the Palatine/German immigrations? How often were there intermarriages > between the two groups in the 1700's? > > > Before my mother infected me with the genealogical sleuth bug, I always > thought we were English and Dutch. Lo and behold, tracing those female > lines, once you can find the maiden name, leads to many surprises. I am > primarily looking in New York state. > > > My known lines are Terpening/ Terwilliger, Beem, Degraff, Shutts,Hooglandt > and associated lines, Dingman, Rouw, Swartout, Gardenier, Van Valkenburgh, > Yates, Vandenburg, Coppernoll and many other maternal line feeders. > > Sue > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DUTCH-COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > To contact the DUTCH-COLONIES list administrator, send an email to > DUTCH-COLONIES-admin@rootsweb.com. > > To post a message to the DUTCH-COLONIES mailing list, send an email to > DUTCH-COLONIES@rootsweb.com. > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DUTCH-COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body > of the > email with no additional text. > >

Hi Sue, You will find information about many of the families you are asking about on my website at www.angelfire.com/ga4/myhayes_family/. I am related to many of the same families. Richard

Hi Sue,   There are resources for identifying surnames and early family origins: For Dutch era surnames:  David M. Riker's Genealogical and biographical directory to persons in New Netherland, from 1613 to 1674 For New York Palatines: Henry Z. Jones’ Palatine Families of New York 1710, and other volumes in his series.   Marriages between the Palatine Germans and the earlier families occurred from the time the Germans arrived and increased among those born in New York in later generations. It's unusual to find families with Dutch era roots that don't have Palatine intermarriages.   From the surnames you mention, I assume you’ve reached either Jacob or Gerrit Terpenning, who married Annatje and Maria Beem.  Jones identifies the daughters of Joh. Albert Beem, a 1710 immigrant with his father Henrich Bohm (Hunter #63).  Some of their records from the Kingston Ref. Church which confirm the placement:   1721 07 Apr; Hendrik Beem, wid Maria Appel, born Germany; Juliana _. (banns)   1721 23 Aug; Albert Beem; Margrietjen Beeshaaren, both born Germany, both liv Kingstown. (with ill. child)   1721 Aug 27; Albert Beem, Margrietjen Beesharen; Marytjen; Jan Oet, Hillegonda Slegtenaar   1728 Feb 11; Albert Been, Grietjen Peeshaar; Anna; Willem Douwdie, Anna Beem   1746 25 May; Jacob Teerpenning, jm, born New Paltz liv Kingston; Marreitje Bem, jd, of Kingston.   1750 20 Sep; Gerret Teerpenning, jm, born New Palz liv Kingston; Annaatje Beem, jd, of Kingston.   1752 Apr 12; Gerret Teerpenning, Annaatje Bem; Margriet; Albert Bem & wife Margriet Beesharen   Jim ________________________________ From: Sue Christensen <suemeadowbrook@yahoo.com> To: "DUTCH-COLONIES@rootsweb.com" <DUTCH-COLONIES@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 9:01 AM Subject: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Surnames Are there clues to tell if a surname is of Dutch colonial origin versus from the Palatine/German immigrations? How often were there intermarriages between the two groups in the 1700's? Before my mother infected me with the genealogical sleuth bug, I always thought we were English and Dutch. Lo and behold, tracing those female lines, once you can find the maiden name, leads to many surprises. I am primarily looking in New York state. My known lines are Terpening/ Terwilliger, Beem, Degraff, Shutts,Hooglandt and associated lines, Dingman, Rouw, Swartout, Gardenier, Van Valkenburgh, Yates, Vandenburg, Coppernoll and many other  maternal line feeders. Sue ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DUTCH-COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Are there clues to tell if a surname is of Dutch colonial origin versus from the Palatine/German immigrations? How often were there intermarriages between the two groups in the 1700's? Before my mother infected me with the genealogical sleuth bug, I always thought we were English and Dutch. Lo and behold, tracing those female lines, once you can find the maiden name, leads to many surprises. I am primarily looking in New York state. My known lines are Terpening/ Terwilliger, Beem, Degraff, Shutts,Hooglandt and associated lines, Dingman, Rouw, Swartout, Gardenier, Van Valkenburgh, Yates, Vandenburg, Coppernoll and many other  maternal line feeders. Sue

Further to the post by Cor, you can find many details about this family at the following web sites.  http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=edwkipp8   http://www.kipp-blake-families.ca/kipfam.htm   Regards Edward Kipp   From the banks of the Ottawa River, river of the voyageurs!

I am looking for help - suggestions - anything. I've run dry. I have collected a great deal of information regarding my fourth great grandfather, Andrew Norwood, much of it because of help from the outstanding researchers on this email list. However, the one record that has eluded me is the record of his marriage to Annetje (Hannah) Van Orden which occurred about 1735. (That estimated date is based solely on the date of the first known child, Catrena, baptized in New Brunswick, Middlesex, NJ May 1737.) I have assumed that they married in New Jersey, but of course, I don't know that. Her brothers Peter & Tobias were in New Brunswick about that time. Peter's child was baptized there in Jun 1734. But the Van Ordens and Norwood came from New York City, so I'm looking everywhere and not making any assumptions on that. Both Annetje and Andrew were baptized in the Dutch Reformed Church in New York City, and Andrew was apprenticed as a wigmaker in New York City from 1718 - 1725. About that time he was listed as one of the early men who established Hoosick - where he was buried in 1787. So like so many, he has connections all over, and so I've been trying to concentrate on her - where she was, how and when he might have connected with her. My next project is to track her father, Johannes Van Orden. He baptized the last child that I can find, Henrika in 1725 in New York City. Does anyone out there know if and when he moved to New Jersey? And any recommendations for further research? I've gone through every single book, contacted every society, archives, etc., that I can find, but have struck out completely. Any ideas? Appreciate any suggestions you might have. Lynne ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to <mailto:DUTCH-COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com> DUTCH-COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Dear list, We have put some minor new details on our website that might be interesting to Kip researchers, including images and translations of two marriage intentions. Go to: http://17thcenturyhollanders.pbworks.com/w/page/63040141/Hendrick%20Hendricksz%20Kip Regards Cor Snabel

It might help to Google "Jansen ruloph" . . . There's even one who was alive in 2010. Good luck. SKIP2MLOU > From: RichardAHayes@bex.net > To: suemeadowbrook@yahoo.com; dutch-colonies@rootsweb.com > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:01:03 -0500 > Subject: Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Looking for SURNAME help: Ruleff > > Hi Sue, > > Try my website at www.angelfire.com/ga4/myhayes_family/. I have many Dutch > families on the website. If you are looking for Palatine families try > freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nelliswebsite/ > > If you are looking for a specific family, let me know. > > Richard > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DUTCH-COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Sue, Try my website at www.angelfire.com/ga4/myhayes_family/. I have many Dutch families on the website. If you are looking for Palatine families try freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nelliswebsite/ If you are looking for a specific family, let me know. Richard

Judy, I checked six images and do not have this problem. Try signing out of Ancestry and closing it, wait a few, then re-open and sign in. I don't know that this will work, but it might. The problem I'm having right now is that they're repeatedly signing me out.  They always tell me that Ancestry doesn't like my browser - Safari - but I only have this problem about twice a year. Nancy ----- Original Message ----- From: jacassidy22@verizon.net Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:43 pm Subject: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Ancestry.com To: dutch-colonies@rootsweb.com > > Today when I went into Ancestry.com to use the census > information, I > discovered a large gray rectangle covering a portion of the > left side of the > Preview Page and at the bottom the black words, Page Tools. > I can access > the census just fine, but the citations are covered up. > Anyone else having > this issue. When i called, they didn't have a clue what I > was talking > about. This concerns all census years. If you put your > curser on the list > of surnames that comes up, that is clear and fine, it is only > when you click > "view Records" to the left that this issue appears. > Judy > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DUTCH- > COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

I have Safari also Nancy, but this is the first problem I have encountered. Judy On 01/23/13, nancyterhune@optonline.net wrote: Judy, I checked six images and do not have this problem. Try signing out of Ancestry and closing it, wait a few, then re-open and sign in. I don't know that this will work, but it might. The problem I'm having right now is that they're repeatedly signing me out. They always tell me that Ancestry doesn't like my browser - Safari - but I only have this problem about twice a year. Nancy ----- Original Message ----- From: [1]jacassidy22@verizon.net Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:43 pm Subject: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Ancestry.com To: [2]dutch-colonies@rootsweb.com > > Today when I went into Ancestry.com to use the census > information, I > discovered a large gray rectangle covering a portion of the > left side of the > Preview Page and at the bottom the black words, Page Tools. > I can access > the census just fine, but the citations are covered up. > Anyone else having > this issue. When i called, they didn't have a clue what I > was talking > about. This concerns all census years. If you put your > curser on the list > of surnames that comes up, that is clear and fine, it is only > when you click > "view Records" to the left that this issue appears. > Judy > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DUTCH- > [3]COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DU[4]TCH-COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message References 1. mailto:jacassidy22@verizon.net 2. mailto:dutch-colonies@rootsweb.com 3. mailto:COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com 4. mailto:TCH-COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com

Today when I went into Ancestry.com to use the census information, I discovered a large gray rectangle covering a portion of the left side of the Preview Page and at the bottom the black words, Page Tools. I can access the census just fine, but the citations are covered up. Anyone else having this issue. When i called, they didn't have a clue what I was talking about. This concerns all census years. If you put your curser on the list of surnames that comes up, that is clear and fine, it is only when you click "view Records" to the left that this issue appears. Judy

Hello, I just joined this list and have no idea how active it is. I have quite a few Dutch and Palatines in my heritage and thought this might be a good list to join. I am having a problem with figuring out how to find a person whose surname is spelled quite a few ways and was at the mercy of whoever was writing it in the records as he seems to have been illiterate if marking an "X" to documents is any intimation. I have seen this name as Rulef, Ruelif, Roelof, Roloff, Ruluf, Ruliff...It's a nightmare to find in the census. The individual and what I surmise about him is as follows: John or Johannes Ruleff/Roelof etc. Was in Canajoharie buying land in 1815-1824, but was mentioned as already having a house adjacent to lot purchases. Appeared on the Canjoharie census in 1825 next to Jacob Ruleff (likely his son who removed to Cayuga) Was in 1830 census in Canajoharie. Was a deponent for the military pension application of Rudolph/Adolphus Dingman of Minden in 1833. In said testimony said he was acquainted with Rudolph in Claverack during the Revolutionary War. In said testimony made remark of himself serving 9 months under Philip Miller in Col Van Renssalaer's Regiment Puts him in Claverack during Rev War. A Johannes Roelof married Eva Keller in 1786 in the Kinderhook DRC. Jacob, possible son, was born ca 1788 and likely married a Dingman relative of above Adolphus. A "Dolly Rulef" is mentioned in Canajoharie in the Index to Reverend Toll's Lost Records. Cited he, John, was 87 years of age in 1833  thus born ca, 1746.  The census records for Montgomery County are dreadfully difficult to read and smeary, so I cannot tell if he went to Canajoharie earlier than ca 1815. I cannot find evidence of him in Columbia. I cannot find a listing of militia for Claverack to see if he is on there. I don't know if I should be looking for a parent with the last name R*l*f or if it would be someone like the following using the tradition of father's first name becomes the son's last name: Jansen, Roelof of Schodack, Albany, NY I am really having difficulty with tracing this surname back any further, though I can find plenty of instances of using it as a given name, which I think is the variant of "Rudolph". Thank you for any assistance. Sue

Hi Mike et al, Mike presented the following list of baptisms at Conewago, but one of the dates was in error: Mike wrote: 28 Apr 1772; Vanteyn, Saral, Arreiantie Van Nuys; Antie >> > 2 May 1779; Vanteyn, Saral, Arreiantie Van Nuys; Maria 9 Mar 1783; Vanteyn, Saral, Arreiantie VAn Nuys; Catlino Conewago Batpsims online at: http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nycayuga/church/conbapt.htmMike Morrissey The records should read: 28 Apr 1776 for Antie >> > 2 May 1779 9 Mar 1783 Regards, Pam Sears

Renee & David, > This may be worth little as I seem to have lost the link to the source and can not seem to relocate it at the moment. On the other hand, > (p. 634) Jacoubs Van Nuys to Hendrick Van Duerson 23 February 1751--Jacobus Van Nuys and Arentje Van Nuys Widow and Garret Stoothoff Surving Executors of the ... Will... of John Van Nuys Deceased the said Jacobus Van Nuys being the only Son & Heir of the sd. John Van nuys deceased...(sold to)... Hendrick Van Duerson... City of New Brunswick... I don't know the source for this, but there is a deed for the same estate, which unfortunately is less helpful, abstracted in:East New Jersey Land Records, Books G3 and H3, abstracted by Richard S. Hutchinson Book H-3 - East New Jersey Land Records, 1774 - 1791, pg 107 Pg 41. 8 Aug 1770. John Dennis of New Brunswick, Middlesex Co., East N,. hatter, sells to Peter Lupe.... WHEREAS, the heirs of James Van Niece[?] & Garret Stotehoff[?], Exec. of the will of John Van Niece, dec'd, by deeds claim an angle of land on the e. side of Queens Street... > > 3. Who were the parents of Charles Van Tine? Charles Vantine was probably the son of Jacques Fonteyn and Neeltje Bouwman, based on the witnesses at the baptism of his oldest child and the naming of his children: 21 Jun 1767; Funtein, Charl, Adriantje; Neeltie; Jaquis Funtine and wife Nelly. vol 12, pg 228 17 Jul 1768; Funtein, Charl, Adriantje; Nelley. Vol 12, pg 229 8 Nov 1772; Fontine, Charel, Adrianentje; Jacobus. vol 12, pg 231 >From "New Brunswick First Reformed Church Baptisms," Proceedings New Jersey Historical Society (New Series) 28 Apr 1772; Vanteyn, Saral, Arreiantie Van Nuys; Antie 2 May 1779; Vanteyn, Saral, Arreiantie Van Nuys; Maria 9 Mar 1783; Vanteyn, Saral, Arreiantie VAn Nuys; Catlino Conewago Batpsims online at: http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nycayuga/church/conbapt.htm Mike Morrissey

I could not find how to get to the index archives to check it out. What category is it located in???

David, This may be worth little as I seem to have lost the link to the source and can not seem to relocate it at the moment. On the other hand, perhaps someone on the list may recognize it and thus help us both out.... I have your James Van Nuis as being the same individual as the fellow called Jacobus Van Nuy(e)s in the New Brunswick DRC records. For his first wife, the only name that I have at this time is Antje. They baptized several children who are not named in the will. "New Brunswick First Reformed Church Baptisms," Proceedings New Jersey Historical Society (New Series) 1748. Oct. 30. Van Nuise, Jacobus and Antje--Arejantie [11:3:414] 1751. Dec. 22. V. Nuys, Jacobus and Anthe--Elizabeth [11:3:417] 1754. June 30. V. Nuis, Jacobus and Antie--Johannes [11:4:553] 1757. July 10. Van Nuis, Jacobus and Antie--Jacobus [11:4:555] 1759. Sept. 17. Van Nuis, Jacobus and Antje--Elisabeth [11:4:560] 1763. July 3. Van Nuis, Jacobus and Antie--Willem Witnesses: Wm. V. Duersen and Elisabeth Duersen [12:1:82] 1767. Aug. 30 Van Nuis, Jacobus and Antje--Antje [12:2:228] Jacobus/James was the son of Johannis (John) Van Nuys and Ariaentje Wyckoff. This identification is based on the following document for which I can't find the source: (p. 634) Jacoubs Van Nuys to Hendrick Van Duerson 23 February 1751--Jacobus Van Nuys and Arentje Van Nuys Widow and Garret Stoothoff Surving Executors of the ... Will... of John Van Nuys Deceased the said Jacobus Van Nuys being the only Son & Heir of the sd. John Van nuys deceased...(sold to)... Hendrick Van Duerson... City of New Brunswick... Now this Indenture...(for 310 pounds)... All that ...Lot of land... in the City of New Brunswick... (adjoining land owners or names--Burnet Street, lands of the heirs of Jacob Frelinghuysen Deaceased, Benjamin Rumney ...) (Signed James Van Nuys, Garret Stoothoff, Antantje Vannuis made her mark when she signed). (13 Jan 1793--James Van Nuis acknowledged the above deed in Court) This acknowledgment would have been just shorly before he died, if I'm correct. Renee L. Dauven On 1/20/2013 8:01 AM, dlear@epix.net wrote: > James Van Nuis of New Brunswick, Middlesex Co., NJ, in his > will dated 28 February 1793, inventory 6 March 1797, named the following heirs: > i. Wife Rachel. She was his second wife, Rachel > Onderdonk, whom he married 7 March 1780 in Middlesex Co; > ii. Son > John; > iii. Daughter > Catlina (1745-1799), wife of Jacob DeReamer; > iv. Daughter > Ariantye, wife of Charles Van Tine; > v. John > and Anne, children of deceased daughter Elizabeth who had been the wife of John > Ryder. > Questions: > > 1. Who > were the parents of James Van Nuis? > 2. Who > was his first wife and the mother of his children? > 3. Who > were the parents of Charles Van Tine? > > > Thanks, > > David > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DUTCH-COLONIES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

James Van Nuis of New Brunswick, Middlesex Co., NJ, in his will dated 28 February 1793, inventory 6 March 1797, named the following heirs: i.        Wife Rachel. She was his second wife, Rachel Onderdonk, whom he married 7 March 1780 in Middlesex Co; ii.      Son John; iii.    Daughter Catlina (1745-1799), wife of Jacob DeReamer; iv.    Daughter Ariantye, wife of Charles Van Tine; v.      John and Anne, children of deceased daughter Elizabeth who had been the wife of John Ryder. Questions: 1.      Who were the parents of James Van Nuis? 2.      Who was his first wife and the mother of his children? 3.      Who were the parents of Charles Van Tine?   Thanks, David

It appears I have to re-edit this page. Who knows what happened; it was fine when I uploaded it. The formatting will look better in a little while after I fix it. Meanwhile, it's readable, just has some strange code in it. Liz J On 19 January 2013 17:34, cor snabel <cor.snabel@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear List, > > Here is some new info on Michiel Tadens, the inn keeper of Pearl Street: > > http://17thcenturyhollanders.pbworks.com/w/page/62543473/Michiel%20Tadens%20of%20New%20Amsterdam > > Regards > Cor Snabel > > ************** > For New Netherland Resources - ships lists, church records, land records > and more visit http://olivetreegenealogy.com/nn/ > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > NEW-NETHERLAND-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >