Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 3460/10000
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Problem receiving messages?
    2. Steve Ostrom
    3. If you check at: http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/Dutch-Colonies/ you can see all messages posted on the D-C list. Steve O. At 04:12 PM 2/13/2011, you wrote: >Help! I haven't received any messages from the D-C List since 4 Feb. >Is anyone else having this problem? > >Larry Voreis > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' >without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    02/13/2011 09:37:24
    1. [DUTCH-COLONIES] Problem receiving messages?
    2. Larry Voreis
    3. Help! I haven't received any messages from the D-C List since 4 Feb. Is anyone else having this problem? Larry Voreis

    02/13/2011 09:12:03
    1. [DUTCH-COLONIES] New Handbook for Using New York State Probate Records
    2. Morse, Ginevra
    3. Now available: "New York State Probate Records: A Genealogist’s Guide to Testate and Intestate Records, Second Edition" By: Gordon L. Remington, FUGA, FASG Publisher: New England Historic Genealogical Society, Boston Copyright: 2011, Second Edition, Softcover, 216 pp. Price: $24.95 Genealogists can find a wealth of information from standard probate records (wills and administrations) as well as ancillary records. It’s just a matter of knowing where to look... This newly updated guide shows you where and how to locate New York State probate records spanning more than 350 years. Learn how to access these records through the Family History Library in Salt Lake City, each of New York’s sixty-two county surrogate’s courts (those in charge of probating estates today), and other key repositories. New York State Probate Records is an essential handbook for anyone with New York ancestors. New to this edition: - Easy-to-use layout - County maps - Updated contact information - Online resources Order today: http://americanancestors.org/Product.aspx?id=21744 1-888-296-3447 [email protected] ******************************************************************** The New England Historic Genealogical Society (NEHGS) is the country's leading resource for family history research. Founded in 1845, NEHGS also produces some of the most important publications in genealogy including family histories, essential research handbooks, and comprehensive guides. Want to become an NEHGS author? Find our submission guidelines online: http://americanancestors.org/book-submission-guidelines/ Learn more about NEHGS at www.AmericanAncestors.org.

    02/04/2011 12:35:07
    1. [DUTCH-COLONIES] Lucas Vanarsdale
    2. If Barbara L. Van Norsdall is a member of this list group, would she please contact me at [email protected] It is in regard to Mary Jan Vanarasdale, the daughter of Lucas Vanarsdale and Catherine Currie. Thanks Judy

    02/03/2011 06:10:40
    1. [DUTCH-COLONIES] Lucas Vanarsdale
    2. If Barbara L. Van Norsdall is a member of this list group, would she please contact me at [email protected] It is in regard to Mary Jan Vanarasdale, the daughter of Lucas Vanarsdale and Catherine Currie. Thanks Judy

    02/03/2011 06:10:40
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Barentje Stratsman's kids
    2. ?Hi Doug Smith, I have Barentje Stratsmans and all of her children on my website at www.angelfire.com/ga4/myhayes_family/ Hans Coenraatse is a Barheit. Jacob Janse Gardenier is my 9th great grandfather. Hans Coenraatse is my 8th great grandfather. A considerable amount of information about familiesis found in Lorine McGinnis Schulze Van Slyke books. Richard Professor Jonathan Pearson in his "GENEALOGIES OF THE FIRST SETTLERS of the ANCIENT COUNTY OF ALBANY" tells us of Gardenier (alias Flodder), Jacob Janse, that "His immediate descendants very generally settled in that vicinity {Kinderhook}. His first w. was Josyna ...,who d. Feb., 1669; he afterwards m. Barentje Stratsmans, widow of Hans Coenraatse ; in 1688, she was again a widow with ten children by her first husband and five by her second, all living. The estates of the two fathers were then divided among these 15 children." Has anyone found the documentary evidence of this estate division? Who were these fifteen children of Barentje Stratsmans?

    01/28/2011 12:09:26
    1. [DUTCH-COLONIES] Barentje Stratsman's kids
    2. doug smith
    3. Professor Jonathan Pearson in his "GENEALOGIES OF THE FIRST SETTLERS of the ANCIENT COUNTY OF ALBANY" tells us of Gardenier (alias Flodder), Jacob Janse, that "His immediate descendants very generally settled in that vicinity {Kinderhook}. His first w. was Josyna ...,who d. Feb., 1669; he afterwards m. Barentje Stratsmans, widow of Hans Coenraatse ; in 1688, she was again a widow with ten children by her first husband and five by her second, all living. The estates of the two fathers were then divided among these 15 children." Has anyone found the documentary evidence of this estate division? Who were these fifteen children of Barentje Stratsmans?

    01/27/2011 01:39:04
    1. [DUTCH-COLONIES] Ships Passenger Lists to New Netherland (New York...
    2. Olive Tree Genealogy
    3. Hello everyone, If you have early 17th century ancestors in New Netherland <http://www.olivetreegenealogy.com/nn/>(present day New York) you may be among the majority who are confused by the available ships passenger lists for that time period. Researchers need to understand that all "passenger lists" for travel from the Netherlands to New Netherland between 1654 and 1664 came from information on the debit side of the West India Company Account Book. This book showed who owed money when they arrived. The list of those who owed money on arrival in New Netherland has been published but this brings us to a caveat. Researchers must be very cautious about which version they are using. Many of the early versions are incorrect or missing names. (rest of article edited for this email, you may continue reading at http://olivetreegenealogy.blogspot.com ) You can view these reconstructed and new passenger lists at Ships Passenger Lists to New Netherland< http://www.olivetreegenealogy.com/nn/ships/> at http://www.olivetreegenealogy.com/nn/ships/ This is an Olive Tree Genealogy exclusive. If you find my reconstructed lists on any other websites I'd appreciate a note letting me know. Sadly, plagiarism and copyright violations are in full force on the internet. -- Posted By Genealogy Blogger to Olive Tree Genealogy Blog< http://olivetreegenealogy.blogspot.com/2011/01/ships-passenger-lists-to-new-netherland.html>at 1/21/2011 06:35:00 AM -- Follow my genealogy updates on Twitter http://twitter.com/LorineMS Olive Tree Genealogy http://olivetreegenealogy.com

    01/21/2011 03:06:55
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Ships Passenger Lists to New Netherland (New York...
    2. Thank you so very much for this project, it is very appreciated. Judy Cassidy Jan 21, 2011 10:08:07 AM, [email protected] wrote: =========================================== Hello everyone, If you have early 17th century ancestors in New Netherland (present day New York) you may be among the majority who are confused by the available ships passenger lists for that time period. Researchers need to understand that all "passenger lists" for travel from the Netherlands to New Netherland between 1654 and 1664 came from information on the debit side of the West India Company Account Book. This book showed who owed money when they arrived. The list of those who owed money on arrival in New Netherland has been published but this brings us to a caveat. Researchers must be very cautious about which version they are using. Many of the early versions are incorrect or missing names. (rest of article edited for this email, you may continue reading at http://olivetreegenealogy.blogspot.com ) You can view these reconstructed and new passenger lists at Ships Passenger Lists to New Netherland at http://www.olivetreegenealogy.com/nn/ships/ This is an Olive Tree Genealogy exclusive. If you find my reconstructed lists on any other websites I'd appreciate a note letting me know. Sadly, plagiarism and copyright violations are in full force on the internet. -- Posted By Genealogy Blogger to Olive Tree Genealogy Blogat 1/21/2011 06:35:00 AM -- Follow my genealogy updates on Twitter http://twitter.com/LorineMS Olive Tree Genealogy http://olivetreegenealogy.com ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    01/21/2011 03:00:27
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798
    2. Richard, So, given that Hamannus Anthony Van Slyke and Anatje Haverly named their children following the naming rules, does it make sense to you that this Harmannus Van Slyke is the likely father of Neeltje Schermerhorn's Claara Van Skyke? I'll never know the circumstances of this Claara's birth, but I'd like to think that at least I have the correct father for her. Interestingly, Elizabeth and Evert Schermerhorn, Neeltje's sister and brother-in-law, the sponsors, also named a child Clarasa, b 1815. This is the form of the name Neeltje used in her New Testament. I wonder if they named her after Neeltje's baby? And if that's an indication that she was dead by then? I know people named children in their own family after those who'd already died, but I don't know about naming after other children in the same generation who'd died. The Clarasa b. 1815 would have been a first cousin to Clarasa b. 1798, and in the middle of the 8 children born to Neeltje and her husband Henrick Bastiaanse. Clarasa or Claara isn't a name I can find among those I've entered otherwise in either side of the family, which is what makes me curious about this Clarasa. Doris ---------- Original Message ---------- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:59:15 -0500 ?Hi Doris, I can see that Harmanus Anthony Van Slyke's mother was Claartje Van Slyke. I had a marriage between Harmanus Adam Van Slyke and Annatje Haverly in my file. I have corrected that. I have 3 children for Harmanus Anthony Van Slyke and Annatje Haverly. They were Anthony, bp. 22 Jun 1800, John Haverly, bp. 20 Jan 1809 and Clarissa, bp. 27 Sep 1810. If Annatje father was named John, this all makes sense. All 3 children were named for grandparents. Richard ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ____________________________________________________________ Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d3884bb6313dd791ffst01vuc

    01/20/2011 11:53:04
    1. [DUTCH-COLONIES] SAMPUBCO - courtesy message to visitors
    2. W David Samuelsen
    3. This is a courtesy message addressed to the Internet Explorer users in particular. There was a code glitch causing the lists not to display properly, showing a long string instead. This has been fixed and now showing the lists properly (taking me 5 days to fix every page.) I regret that no one bother to tell me about this problem for over a month. Please come back and visit http://www.sampubco.com/ W. David Samuelsen

    01/20/2011 11:01:09
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798
    2. ?Hi Doris, I can see that Harmanus Anthony Van Slyke's mother was Claartje Van Slyke. I had a marriage between Harmanus Adam Van Slyke and Annatje Haverly in my file. I have corrected that. I have 3 children for Harmanus Anthony Van Slyke and Annatje Haverly. They were Anthony, bp. 22 Jun 1800, John Haverly, bp. 20 Jan 1809 and Clarissa, bp. 27 Sep 1810. If Annatje father was named John, this all makes sense. All 3 children were named for grandparents. Richard

    01/20/2011 01:59:15
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798
    2. Richard, I've got yet a third Harmannus as the best probability, according to Lorine some years back. He was bp. 23 Feb 1777. Lorine got the name, I believe, from Pearson, and thought he was the best choice because his parents were Antonie Van Slyke and Claara. Lorine didn't give me their dates, or this Claara's last name, and I admit I haven't gone thru your web site or the new Van Slyke book, to check out any of this. Lorine based her guess on this guy's mother's name, and the possibility that Neeltje, or Harmannus, named the baby following the naming rules. Of course, that all depends on whether the pregnancy was consensual or not. Who knows whether she'd have done that if he'd raped her. This Harmanus married Anetje (Nancy) Haverly 28 Oct, 1798, between the birth of Neetlje's baby and her baptism. So, supposing Neeltje wanted the baby and thought naming her after the grandmother would influence Harmannus to marry her, she was wrong. I'd be interested in your take on this Harmannus and the reasoning. Doris ---------- Original Message ---------- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:38:25 -0500 ?Hi Robert Sullivan, I am related to about 70% of the people in the Schenectady Reformed Baptism Book. I have them all on my website at www.angelfire.com/ga4/myhayes_family/. Which Harmanus Van Slyke fathered Clara? I have 2 possibilities. One is a Harmanus Van Slyke who was born on 16 Dec 1769. The other was born on 10 Dec 1775. Richard ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ____________________________________________________________ Globe Life Insurance $1* Buys $50,000 Life Insurance. Adults or Children. No Medical Exam. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d373d2abcea770d57st05vuc

    01/19/2011 12:35:33
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798
    2. Thanks, Mary. Now I have little Claara all tucked away. She apparently died young, since back when I first got the info on her, Lorine found no other record of her. Doris ---------- Original Message ---------- From: Mary Van Orsdol <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:53:51 -0800 Yes, 8480 is the number Kelly assigned. Mary On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:50 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Mary, > Thank you--I didn't see this before I asked for it again. > Let me make sure I follow the whole thing. > baptism Dec. 9 1798 Harmannus Van Slyke (name as father) {this is the > place where in the original his name was upside down, indicating an > illegitimate birth, I was originally told}. > Is the 8480 the number Kelly gave to the baptism in his listing? > DOB is Oct. 6. I didn't remember whether the baby's last name showed up, > so that's good to know too. > Neeltje Schermerhorn (Schermerhoorn) is the mother. So the sponsors must > be Evert Schermerhoorn and Elizabeth Schermerhoorn. I've learned not to > assume that means a married couple, and at the time I didn't know who either > was. Now I know that an Elizabeth was Neeltje's sister, and she married an > Evart Schermerhorn. The family, like many early settlers, was very > inbred--they went back to 1636 in NY, and Neeltje herself was descended from > two of Jacob Janse's sons. So it would make a lot of sense to have her > sister and her husband as sponsors, especially with an out of wedlock child, > when the father married someone else between the birth and the baptism. I'm > very grateful for the information. > Thanks, > Doris > I've got the DOB as Oct. 6 and of , baby Clara Van Slyke (I wasn't quite > sure whether the last name showed up in the record so that's good to know) > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Mary Van Orsdol <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798 > Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:18:10 -0800 > > >From *Baptism Record of Schenectady Reformed Church: Schenectady, New > York, > 1694-1811* (New York: Arthur C. Kelly, 1987), page 371. > > "1798 > 12. 9 Harmannus Van Slyke (name as father) 8480 Clara Van Slyke Evert > Schermerhoorn > Neltje Schermerhoorn b 10. > 6 Elizabeth Schermerhoorn" > > Hope the formatting comes through. > > Mary > > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:30 PM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Can someone please check for me a baptismal record in the Schenectady > DRC, > > 9 Dec. 1798, for Claara, child of Neeltje Schermerhorn and Harmannus Van > > Slyke. The father's name is upside down. I hadn't known, until told, > that > > this meant an illegitimate birth. What I had was Neeltje's own New > > Testament, where she listed her children. Claara is listed there as her > > first, without a last name or a father, unlike her later children. > > > > A number of years ago, someone on this list got this record for me from > > Kelly. I was a newbie, and I didn’t write down the number from Kelly, or > > the names of the sponsors. I do remember that at the time I didn’t > > recognize the names; now that I’ve done more research and have more of > > Neeltje’s relatives, they may be more meaningful. And now I know the > > importance of having Kelly’s number, just for future reference. I've got > > all the children from her marriage to Hendrick Bastiaanse accounted for, > > Kelly's numbers, sponsors and all, so I just need Claara's. > > <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" > > /> > > Thanks, > > Doris Waggoner > > ____________________________________________________________ > > Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance > > If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program > > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d3622c62a3cbc540a5st03vuc > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ____________________________________________________________ Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d3739d36b193d4bd5fst01vuc

    01/19/2011 12:20:25
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798
    2. ?Hi Robert Sullivan, I am related to about 70% of the people in the Schenectady Reformed Baptism Book. I have them all on my website at www.angelfire.com/ga4/myhayes_family/. Which Harmanus Van Slyke fathered Clara? I have 2 possibilities. One is a Harmanus Van Slyke who was born on 16 Dec 1769. The other was born on 10 Dec 1775. Richard

    01/19/2011 01:38:25
  1. 01/19/2011 01:09:24
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798
    2. Mary Van Orsdol
    3. Yes, 8480 is the number Kelly assigned. Mary On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:50 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Mary, > Thank you--I didn't see this before I asked for it again. > Let me make sure I follow the whole thing. > baptism Dec. 9 1798 Harmannus Van Slyke (name as father) {this is the > place where in the original his name was upside down, indicating an > illegitimate birth, I was originally told}. > Is the 8480 the number Kelly gave to the baptism in his listing? > DOB is Oct. 6. I didn't remember whether the baby's last name showed up, > so that's good to know too. > Neeltje Schermerhorn (Schermerhoorn) is the mother. So the sponsors must > be Evert Schermerhoorn and Elizabeth Schermerhoorn. I've learned not to > assume that means a married couple, and at the time I didn't know who either > was. Now I know that an Elizabeth was Neeltje's sister, and she married an > Evart Schermerhorn. The family, like many early settlers, was very > inbred--they went back to 1636 in NY, and Neeltje herself was descended from > two of Jacob Janse's sons. So it would make a lot of sense to have her > sister and her husband as sponsors, especially with an out of wedlock child, > when the father married someone else between the birth and the baptism. I'm > very grateful for the information. > Thanks, > Doris > I've got the DOB as Oct. 6 and of , baby Clara Van Slyke (I wasn't quite > sure whether the last name showed up in the record so that's good to know) > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Mary Van Orsdol <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798 > Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:18:10 -0800 > > >From *Baptism Record of Schenectady Reformed Church: Schenectady, New > York, > 1694-1811* (New York: Arthur C. Kelly, 1987), page 371. > > "1798 > 12. 9 Harmannus Van Slyke (name as father) 8480 Clara Van Slyke Evert > Schermerhoorn > Neltje Schermerhoorn b 10. > 6 Elizabeth Schermerhoorn" > > Hope the formatting comes through. > > Mary > > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:30 PM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Can someone please check for me a baptismal record in the Schenectady > DRC, > > 9 Dec. 1798, for Claara, child of Neeltje Schermerhorn and Harmannus Van > > Slyke. The father's name is upside down. I hadn't known, until told, > that > > this meant an illegitimate birth. What I had was Neeltje's own New > > Testament, where she listed her children. Claara is listed there as her > > first, without a last name or a father, unlike her later children. > > > > A number of years ago, someone on this list got this record for me from > > Kelly. I was a newbie, and I didn’t write down the number from Kelly, or > > the names of the sponsors. I do remember that at the time I didn’t > > recognize the names; now that I’ve done more research and have more of > > Neeltje’s relatives, they may be more meaningful. And now I know the > > importance of having Kelly’s number, just for future reference. I've got > > all the children from her marriage to Hendrick Bastiaanse accounted for, > > Kelly's numbers, sponsors and all, so I just need Claara's. > > <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" > > /> > > Thanks, > > Doris Waggoner > > ____________________________________________________________ > > Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance > > If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program > > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d3622c62a3cbc540a5st03vuc > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    01/19/2011 12:53:51
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798
    2. Mary, Thank you--I didn't see this before I asked for it again. Let me make sure I follow the whole thing. baptism Dec. 9 1798 Harmannus Van Slyke (name as father) {this is the place where in the original his name was upside down, indicating an illegitimate birth, I was originally told}. Is the 8480 the number Kelly gave to the baptism in his listing? DOB is Oct. 6. I didn't remember whether the baby's last name showed up, so that's good to know too. Neeltje Schermerhorn (Schermerhoorn) is the mother. So the sponsors must be Evert Schermerhoorn and Elizabeth Schermerhoorn. I've learned not to assume that means a married couple, and at the time I didn't know who either was. Now I know that an Elizabeth was Neeltje's sister, and she married an Evart Schermerhorn. The family, like many early settlers, was very inbred--they went back to 1636 in NY, and Neeltje herself was descended from two of Jacob Janse's sons. So it would make a lot of sense to have her sister and her husband as sponsors, especially with an out of wedlock child, when the father married someone else between the birth and the baptism. I'm very grateful for the information. Thanks, Doris I've got the DOB as Oct. 6 and of , baby Clara Van Slyke (I wasn't quite sure whether the last name showed up in the record so that's good to know) ---------- Original Message ---------- From: Mary Van Orsdol <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:18:10 -0800 >From *Baptism Record of Schenectady Reformed Church: Schenectady, New York, 1694-1811* (New York: Arthur C. Kelly, 1987), page 371. "1798 12. 9 Harmannus Van Slyke (name as father) 8480 Clara Van Slyke Evert Schermerhoorn Neltje Schermerhoorn b 10. 6 Elizabeth Schermerhoorn" Hope the formatting comes through. Mary On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:30 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Can someone please check for me a baptismal record in the Schenectady DRC, > 9 Dec. 1798, for Claara, child of Neeltje Schermerhorn and Harmannus Van > Slyke. The father's name is upside down. I hadn't known, until told, that > this meant an illegitimate birth. What I had was Neeltje's own New > Testament, where she listed her children. Claara is listed there as her > first, without a last name or a father, unlike her later children. > > A number of years ago, someone on this list got this record for me from > Kelly. I was a newbie, and I didn’t write down the number from Kelly, or > the names of the sponsors. I do remember that at the time I didn’t > recognize the names; now that I’ve done more research and have more of > Neeltje’s relatives, they may be more meaningful. And now I know the > importance of having Kelly’s number, just for future reference. I've got > all the children from her marriage to Hendrick Bastiaanse accounted for, > Kelly's numbers, sponsors and all, so I just need Claara's. > <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" > /> > Thanks, > Doris Waggoner > ____________________________________________________________ > Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance > If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d3622c62a3cbc540a5st03vuc > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    01/18/2011 09:50:42
    1. Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798
    2. Robert, Thank you for all those links. However, Claara's baptism isn't among the Schenectady baptisms listed. So I still would like to ask someone who has access to Kelly to look her up for me. Claara is the daughter of Neeltje (or other spellings) Schermerhorn and Harmannus Van Slyke. I am interested in who the witnesses are. And Kelly's number. Thanks, Doris ---------- Original Message ---------- From: Robert Sullivan <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:56:27 -0500 > Can someone please check for me a baptismal record in the Schenectady DRC, 9 Dec. 1798, for Claara, Since the original question has been answered, I will mention that there are some transcriptions of church records linked from the Churches section at the Schenectady Digital History Archive: <http://www.schenectadyhistory.org/churches/index.html> This includes Betty Fink's collections from the Dutch churches of Schenectady, Princetown and other places; Robert Billard's extracts from Pearson's genealogies; Channon Moon's work with the First Reformed Church of Scotia; and Cliff Lamere's set from St. George's Episcopal. There are also many links to various church histories from the church sites and books I've put online. -- Bob Sullivan Schenectady Digital History Archive <http://www.schenectadyhistory.org/> Schenectady County (NY) Public Library ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ____________________________________________________________ Globe Life Insurance $1* Buys $50,000 Life Insurance. Adults or Children. No Medical Exam. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d3661f0b0bb27548d3st05vuc

    01/18/2011 08:59:20
    1. [DUTCH-COLONIES] Baptismal Record Schenectady 9 Dec 1798
    2. Can someone please check for me a baptismal record in the Schenectady DRC, 9 Dec. 1798, for Claara, child of Neeltje Schermerhorn and Harmannus Van Slyke. The father's name is upside down. I hadn't known, until told, that this meant an illegitimate birth. What I had was Neeltje's own New Testament, where she listed her children. Claara is listed there as her first, without a last name or a father, unlike her later children. A number of years ago, someone on this list got this record for me from Kelly. I was a newbie, and I didn’t write down the number from Kelly, or the names of the sponsors. I do remember that at the time I didn’t recognize the names; now that I’ve done more research and have more of Neeltje’s relatives, they may be more meaningful. And now I know the importance of having Kelly’s number, just for future reference. I've got all the children from her marriage to Hendrick Bastiaanse accounted for, Kelly's numbers, sponsors and all, so I just need Claara's. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> Thanks, Doris Waggoner ____________________________________________________________ Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d3622c62a3cbc540a5st03vuc

    01/18/2011 04:30:14