I have well & truely come to a brick wall & need some advise please   Since I can't find any info futher on James Thorburn is it pointless to hire someone in Scotland to dig further??? Any help will be most appreciated   The only info I have on him is from the census   1841 census                                       Source Ancestry.com Thornhill S Side Of Meetinghouse Street  Morton Dumfriesshire  John Thorburn            30        Cabinet M J           Dumfriesshire, Scotland   Alexander Thorburn      1                                      Dumfriesshire, Scotland Isabella Thorburn       30                                       Dumfriesshire, Scotland James Thorburn           5                                       Dumfriesshire, Scotland James Thorburn         70     Occupation: Ind         Dumfriesshire, Scotland Mary Thorburn             3                                        Dumfriesshire, Scotland William Thorburn        5 Mo                                   Dumfriesshire, Scotland 1851 Scotland Census                                Source Ancestry.com 26 West Morton St Thornhill, Morton, Dumfriesshire John Thorburn        43    Head          Cabinet Maker     Dumfries, Dumfries Alexn Thorburn      11    Son             Wood Lab            Morton, Dumfries   Isabella Thorburn  32    Wife                                        Morton, Dumfries  James Thorburn    15    Son             Wood Lab           Morton, Dumfries  James Thorburn    82    Father         Retired Joiner     Johnston, Dumfries  Margaret Thorburn  1    Daughter                                 Morton, Dumfries  Mary Thorburn      13    Daughter     Wood Lab            Morton, Dumfries  Kind regards Pamela Thorburn Marshall, Qld, Australia

Surely the simple answer is to change the default to reply to the Group instead of to the Originator, as other Rootsweb lists do? The Administrator can change that setting in seconds. Stanley -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce McDowall Sent: 02 March 2012 10:31 PM To: Jerrold Brosious Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] General List question I'd like to add 2 more points: 1. 'Reply to all' results in the message being sent to the originator twice - one direct from you, and one via Rootsweb. If the originator is subscribed in 'List' mode, there will only be a short delay between the two. If the originator is subscribed only in 'Digest' mode, the message from Rootsweb could be delayed for days, depending on certain options set by that List's administrator. For this reason, I think it best to not delete the direct address from your 'Reply to All' message. 2. When replying to the list, the default usually includes the original message, including headers, footers, tag lines, etc. Leaving this unedited can clutter your reply unnecessarily, so its best to spend a little time deleting superfluous content from the original message as appended to your reply. This may include some or even all of the original text. For anyone in 'Digest' mode only, the potential for clutter is enormous, so one needs to be mindful of this. Regards, Bruce ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

could that please be the last comment on this overworked problem? > Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:29:59 -0800 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] 'REPLY TO' PROBLEM > > This comes up every year or so. There are some reasons to direct replies > to the list but there are many more good reasons not to. As it stands > now, if it is a simple thank you or a comment about a comment, it should > not go to the list and into the archives. I f a message contains > genealogical information it should. For these messages a member only has > to click 'reply to all' > This list will remain configured as it is now. > > Tom Welch, Admin. D/G list > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Well, I'm sorry I mentioned this; it seems I've hit a sore point I was quite unaware of as I am very new to the list, as of February.   ________________________________ From: c mundy <[email protected]> To: [email protected]; Dumfries Discussion <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, March 2, 2012 8:32:21 PM Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] 'REPLY TO' PROBLEM could that please be the last comment on this overworked problem? > Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:29:59 -0800 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] 'REPLY TO' PROBLEM > > This comes up every year or so. There are some reasons to direct replies > to the list but there are many more good reasons not to. As it stands > now, if it is a simple thank you or a comment about a comment, it should > not go to the list and into the archives. I f a message contains > genealogical information it should. For these messages a member only has > to click 'reply to all' > This list will remain configured as it is now. > > Tom Welch, Admin. D/G list > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >quotes in the subject and the body of the message                         ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This comes up every year or so. There are some reasons to direct replies to the list but there are many more good reasons not to. As it stands now, if it is a simple thank you or a comment about a comment, it should not go to the list and into the archives. I f a message contains genealogical information it should. For these messages a member only has to click 'reply to all' This list will remain configured as it is now. Tom Welch, Admin. D/G list

Stanley, I completely agree.  Still, I am new to the List and recognize that someone made this default decision because some concerns were reported in the past.  But I am more concerned that good material of interest to the whole list---and future researchers checking the archives---is and will be missed by the default setting to go to the only to the individual  who sent the message.  Here's a perfect example:  Here I am advocating Stanley and Vanessa's ideas and a few minutes ago I replied to Stanley's message with my thoughts but hit only "reply".......I forgot to hit "reply to all" ! ________________________________

My understanding is that if someone wants to make a private reply they use the listers own email address rather than use reply to all. As you say, if someone has posted a question we would all like to see the reply if possible, but if the reply contains something personal or they wish to attach an item, then they use just the reply option. But the idea of the list is to share information so we can all benefit from the questions and answers, so lister when replying please remember to, reply to all, when ever possible. If someone does send a private reply I have found that on some lists this same person will post saying that they have replied off list. Vanessa  All records are subject to error. Let they without typo caste tea thirst scone! View my photostream at http://www.flickr.com/photos/snapshistory/ ________________________________ From: Jerrold Brosious <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, 2 March 2012, 15:37 Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] General List question Thanks to everyone who replied to my question and now I understand how it all works.   The only thing I wonder about is,  because a reply defaults to go only to the individual and  not the whole List,  I have to believe that in some (many?) cases the sender would deem it appropriate to go to the whole List but isn't aware or remembering that it's going only to the individual.  Of course I realize that some people for whatever reason are making a conscious choice not to have it go to the whole group.     For others who aren't noticing or remembering,  and when the content of their reply is good information that could  prod further group discussion,  it seems too bad that it isn't reaching everyone.     ________________________________ From: Jerrold Brosious <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, March 1, 2012 4:09:55 PM Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] General List question Hi,  I just posted an item and have already heard from two people.  Before making any replies to the list, I need guidance.   When someone replies to me and I want my reply to go to The List---which will include that individual----when I hit reply it shows just the name of that person as recipient of my response.   For me, almost always I'll want it to go to the whole list, so must I always choose "reply to all" ?   Or will it automatically go to [email protected] even though it doesn't show as recipient?   Jerry ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message    

I have a Cole/Coll family from Kirkcudbright (originally from Ireland) and this is also a derivative of Nicholas. You can see how this would evolve, especially if it was Gaelic. Incidentally, this same family had a daughter [sic] called Nicholas. Jeanette In an 1820's Scottish record I found the man's given name Caull. I'd never seen it before and from baisc on-line searching I found the case of a living person with the first name Caul, a nickname for Nicholas. Someone has suggested it could derive from Malcolm. Nicholas strikes me as a sensible source for Caull. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks. Jerry Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Vanessa,  I like the way you put this;  we are in agreement.  ________________________________ From: Vanessa Dixon <[email protected]> To: Jerrold Brosious <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, March 2, 2012 9:52:41 AM Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] General List question My understanding is that if someone wants to make a private reply they use the listers own email address rather than use reply to all. As you say, if someone has posted a question we would all like to see the reply if possible, but if the reply contains something personal or they wish to attach an item, then they use just the reply option. But the idea of the list is to share information so we can all benefit from the questions and answers, so lister when replying please remember to, reply to all, when ever possible. If someone does send a private reply I have found that on some lists this same person will post saying that they have replied off list. Vanessa  All records are subject to error. Let they without typo caste tea thirst scone! View my photostream at http://www.flickr.com/photos/snapshistory/ ________________________________ From: Jerrold Brosious <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, 2 March 2012, 15:37 Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] General List question Thanks to everyone who replied to my question and now I understand how it all works.   The only thing I wonder about is,  because a reply defaults to go only to the individual and  not the whole List,  I have to believe that in some (many?) cases the sender would deem it appropriate to go to the whole List but isn't aware or remembering that it's going only to the individual.  Of course I realize that some people for whatever reason are making a conscious choice not to have it go to the whole group.     For others who aren't noticing or remembering,  and when the content of their reply is good information that could  prod further group discussion,  it seems too bad that it isn't reaching everyone.     ________________________________ From: Jerrold Brosious <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, March 1, 2012 4:09:55 PM Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] General List question Hi,  I just posted an item and have already heard from two people.  Before making any replies to the list, I need guidance.   When someone replies to me and I want my reply to go to The List---which will include that individual----when I hit reply it shows just the name of that person as recipient of my response.   For me, almost always I'll want it to go to the whole list, so must I always choose "reply to all" ?   Or will it automatically go to [email protected] even though it doesn't show as recipient?   Jerry ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message    

Thanks to everyone who replied to my question and now I understand how it all works.   The only thing I wonder about is,  because a reply defaults to go only to the individual and  not the whole List,  I have to believe that in some (many?) cases the sender would deem it appropriate to go to the whole List but isn't aware or remembering that it's going only to the individual.  Of course I realize that some people for whatever reason are making a conscious choice not to have it go to the whole group.     For others who aren't noticing or remembering,  and when the content of their reply is good information that could  prod further group discussion,  it seems too bad that it isn't reaching everyone.     ________________________________ From: Jerrold Brosious <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, March 1, 2012 4:09:55 PM Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] General List question Hi,  I just posted an item and have already heard from two people.  Before making any replies to the list, I need guidance.   When someone replies to me and I want my reply to go to The List---which will include that individual----when I hit reply it shows just the name of that person as recipient of my response.   For me, almost always I'll want it to go to the whole list, so must I always choose "reply to all" ?   Or will it automatically go to [email protected] even though it doesn't show as recipient?   Jerry ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Jerry Choose "Reply to all" and then remove the individual person. The reply will go to everyone, including the individual. Kind regards Stanley -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jerrold Brosious Sent: 01 March 2012 10:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] General List question Hi,  I just posted an item and have already heard from two people. Before making any replies to the list, I need guidance.   When someone replies to me and I want my reply to go to The List---which will include that individual----when I hit reply it shows just the name of that person as recipient of my response.   For me, almost always I'll want it to go to the whole list, so must I always choose "reply to all" ?   Or will it automatically go to [email protected] even though it doesn't show as recipient?   Jerry ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Jerry Sounds more like a variant spelling of Coll which was an old Gaelic name. modern version is Colin. Best wishes Ian A McClumpha Researching Scottish Family History; please look at our website> www.imchad.freeola.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jerrold Brosious Sent: 01 March 2012 21:26 To: [email protected] Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] Man's name Caull Hello, In an 1820's Scottish record I found the man's given name Caull.   I'd never seen it before and from baisc on-line searching I found the case of a living person with the first name Caul,   a nickname for Nicholas.   Someone has suggested it could derive from Malcolm.   Nicholas strikes me as a sensible source for Caull.  Does anyone have any ideas?  Thanks. Jerry Minneapolis, Minnesota,  USA ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Jerry: My understanding is, when an individual writes to you privately, you should reply to that person only. You may use the information sent to you, but you may not re-post the message in its entirety without the consent of the person who wrote to you. Irene (Canada) On 1-Mar-12, at 2:09 PM, Jerrold Brosious wrote: > Hi, I just posted an item and have already heard from two people. > Before making any replies to the list, I need guidance. When > someone replies > to me and I want my reply to go to The List---which will include that > individual----when I hit reply it shows just the name of that person > as > recipient of my response. For me, almost always I'll want it to go > to the > whole list, so must I always choose "reply to all" ? Or will it > automatically > go to [email protected] even though it doesn't show as > recipient? > > > Jerry

Hi,  I just posted an item and have already heard from two people.  Before making any replies to the list, I need guidance.   When someone replies to me and I want my reply to go to The List---which will include that individual----when I hit reply it shows just the name of that person as recipient of my response.   For me, almost always I'll want it to go to the whole list, so must I always choose "reply to all" ?   Or will it automatically go to [email protected] even though it doesn't show as recipient?   Jerry

Hello, In an 1820's Scottish record I found the man's given name Caull.   I'd never seen it before and from baisc on-line searching I found the case of a living person with the first name Caul,   a nickname for Nicholas.   Someone has suggested it could derive from Malcolm.   Nicholas strikes me as a sensible source for Caull.  Does anyone have any ideas?  Thanks. Jerry Minneapolis, Minnesota,  USA

How does one open the attachments? There does not appear anything upon which to click. Thank you. Yvette _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 3:02 AM To: [email protected] Subject: DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY Digest, Vol 7, Issue 28

Wow.. Thank you Meg I would love to have a Jpg of the entry. Desmond -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: February-24-12 3:02 AM To: [email protected] Subject: DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY Digest, Vol 7, Issue 28 Today's Topics: 1. Re: St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Dale family names (Meg Greenwood) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:53:46 -0600 From: Meg Greenwood <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Dale family names To: List - Scotland - Dumfries-Galloway <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Not sure you've gotten all the Wigtownshire Death Registrations mentioned in your post of 2/22 or not. Janet McKAY or DALE who died 1886 is not in the filmed years for Wigtownshire, so I looked for others. The 1888 one was also out, but the 1855 Death of Janet at age 7 is one I could get. Here are details from the Civil Registration..... Wigtown Deaths, 1855, entry #163 Janet DALE, 6y 9m old, had lived in Dumfries her entire life, daughter of John DALE, Stocking Maker and Janet McKAY, died May 13, 1855 at 11:30am at Watts Close off High Street, Dumfriesshire of Scarletina Dropsy, duration 10d. Certified by A Mercer [or Amercer, hard to read if 1 word or 2] ADAM, Physician, who saw her May 29th. Buried St. Mary's Churchyard certified by John Gallacher, Sexton. Informant was John DALE, Father, who signed the registration. Registered 31 May at Dumfries by John Landers, Registrar. Write if you'd like a JPG of this entry, it has the signature of John Dale, father. Meg Greenwood / Oklahoma USA ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ To contact the DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY list administrator, send an email to [email protected] To post a message to the DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY mailing list, send an email to [email protected] __________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body of the email with no additional text. End of DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY Digest, Vol 7, Issue 28 ************************************************

Not sure you've gotten all the Wigtownshire Death Registrations mentioned in your post of 2/22 or not. Janet McKAY or DALE who died 1886 is not in the filmed years for Wigtownshire, so I looked for others. The 1888 one was also out, but the 1855 Death of Janet at age 7 is one I could get. Here are details from the Civil Registration..... Wigtown Deaths, 1855, entry #163 Janet DALE, 6y 9m old, had lived in Dumfries her entire life, daughter of John DALE, Stocking Maker and Janet McKAY, died May 13, 1855 at 11:30am at Watts Close off High Street, Dumfriesshire of Scarletina Dropsy, duration 10d. Certified by A Mercer [or Amercer, hard to read if 1 word or 2] ADAM, Physician, who saw her May 29th. Buried St. Mary's Churchyard certified by John Gallacher, Sexton. Informant was John DALE, Father, who signed the registration. Registered 31 May at Dumfries by John Landers, Registrar. Write if you'd like a JPG of this entry, it has the signature of John Dale, father. Meg Greenwood / Oklahoma USA -------------------------------------------------

Desmond Try this link http://www.dgfhs.org.uk/userfiles/file/BURIALS%20FROM%20THE%20OLD%20PARISH%20REGISTERS.pdf Pat Australia On 23/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone (Desmond McDowell) > 2. Re: St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone (Sandy Pittendreigh) > 3. Re: St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone (Sandy Pittendreigh) > 4. Re: St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone (Clifford Johnston) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:54:16 -0500 > From: "Desmond McDowell" <[email protected]> > Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Can anyone tell me if St. Mary's Church Cemetery is online or if any > photos > of the gravestone have been taken. > > Or if someone who lives in the area would be so kind as to take a > photo of > the gravestone would be must appreciated. The information I have is > below. > Cemetery Record ID:7209 > Location: Dumfries (St. Mary's Churchyard), Dumfriesshire > In Memory of > Janet McKAY, wife of John DALE, stockingmaker, who died 14th July > 1886 aged > 75 years > Also the above John DALE, stockingmaker, who died 14th January 1888 > aged 79 > years > Also Janet McKay DALE, daughter of John DALE, stockingmaker, who > died on the > 30th of May 1855 aged 7 years > Surname Forenames Death Birth > Dale Janet McKay 1855 1848 > Dale John 1888 1809 > McKay Janet 1886 1811 > > > Desmond > Ontario, Canada > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:19:33 +0000 (GMT) > From: Sandy Pittendreigh <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - > Gravestone > To: Desmond McDowell <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Have a look at http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~dfsgal/ > > > > ________________________________ > From: Desmond McDowell <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 14:54 > Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone > > Can anyone tell me if St. Mary's Church Cemetery is online or if any > photos > of the gravestone have been taken. > > Or if someone who lives in the area would be so kind as to take a > photo of > the gravestone would be must appreciated. The information I have is > below. > Cemetery Record ID:7209 > Location:??? Dumfries (St. Mary's Churchyard), Dumfriesshire > In Memory of > Janet McKAY, wife of John DALE, stockingmaker, who died 14th July > 1886 aged > 75 years > Also the above John DALE, stockingmaker, who died 14th January 1888 > aged 79 > years > Also Janet McKay DALE, daughter of John DALE, stockingmaker, who > died on the > 30th of May 1855 aged 7 years > Surname??? Forenames??? Death??? Birth??? > Dale??? ??? Janet McKay??? 1855??? 1848 > Dale??? ??? John??? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1888??? 1809 > McKay??? ??? Janet??? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1886??? 1811 > > > Desmond > Ontario, Canada > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:23:28 +0000 (GMT) > From: Sandy Pittendreigh <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - > Gravestone > To: Desmond McDowell <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Sorry, that previous address would work but you would need to know > to select Dumfries from the index. > This is more direct: > http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~dfsgal/Dumfries/St%20Mary/index.htm > ? > > > ________________________________ > From: Desmond McDowell <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 14:54 > Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone > > Can anyone tell me if St. Mary's Church Cemetery is online or if any > photos > of the gravestone have been taken. > > Or if someone who lives in the area would be so kind as to take a > photo of > the gravestone would be must appreciated. The information I have is > below. > Cemetery Record ID:7209 > Location:??? Dumfries (St. Mary's Churchyard), Dumfriesshire > In Memory of > Janet McKAY, wife of John DALE, stockingmaker, who died 14th July > 1886 aged > 75 years > Also the above John DALE, stockingmaker, who died 14th January 1888 > aged 79 > years > Also Janet McKay DALE, daughter of John DALE, stockingmaker, who > died on the > 30th of May 1855 aged 7 years > Surname??? Forenames??? Death??? Birth??? > Dale??? ??? Janet McKay??? 1855??? 1848 > Dale??? ??? John??? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1888??? 1809 > McKay??? ??? Janet??? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1886??? 1811 > > > Desmond > Ontario, Canada > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:57:33 -0600 > From: "Clifford Johnston" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - > Gravestone > To: "'Sandy Pittendreigh'" <[email protected]>, "'Desmond > McDowell'" <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Sandy, > > Many thanks for the link. Now, is there an list of everyone who is > buried > there with their details? Too much to hope for?... > > Cliff. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sandy > Pittendreigh > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:23 PM > To: Desmond McDowell; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - > Gravestone > > Sorry, that previous address would work but you would need to know > to select > Dumfries from the index. > This is more direct: > http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~dfsgal/Dumfries/St%20Mary/index.htm > ? > > > ________________________________ > From: Desmond McDowell <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 14:54 > Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone > > Can anyone tell me if St. Mary's Church Cemetery is online or if any > photos > of the gravestone have been taken. > > Or if someone who lives in the area would be so kind as to take a > photo of > the gravestone would be must appreciated. The information I have is > below. > Cemetery Record ID:7209 > Location:??? Dumfries (St. Mary's Churchyard), Dumfriesshire In > Memory of > Janet McKAY, wife of John DALE, stockingmaker, who died 14th July > 1886 aged > 75 years > Also the above John DALE, stockingmaker, who died 14th January 1888 > aged 79 > years Also Janet McKay DALE, daughter of John DALE, stockingmaker, > who died > on the 30th of May 1855 aged 7 years Surname??? Forenames??? > Death??? Birth > Dale??? ??? Janet McKay??? 1855??? 1848 Dale??? ??? > John??? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > 1888??? 1809 McKay??? ??? Janet??? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1886??? 1811 > > > Desmond > Ontario, Canada > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > ------------------------------ > > To contact the DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY list administrator, send an email to > [email protected] > > To post a message to the DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY mailing list, send an > email to [email protected] > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the > email with no additional text. > > > End of DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY Digest, Vol 7, Issue 26 > ************************************************

Hi Clifford, You wrote : <<Many thanks for the link.  Now, is there an list of everyone who is buried there with their details?  Too much to hope for?...>> Not really! The booklet produced by DGFHS combines both the Deaths & Burials record taken from the OPRs together with a list of all the MIs.   Hope that answers the question. Sandy ________________________________ From: Clifford Johnston <[email protected]> To: 'Sandy Pittendreigh' <[email protected]>; 'Desmond McDowell' <[email protected]>; [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 21:57 Subject: RE: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone Sandy, Many thanks for the link.  Now, is there an list of everyone who is buried there with their details?  Too much to hope for?... Cliff. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sandy Pittendreigh Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:23 PM To: Desmond McDowell; [email protected] Subject: Re: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone Sorry, that previous address would work but you would need to know to select Dumfries from the index. This is more direct: http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~dfsgal/Dumfries/St%20Mary/index.htm   ________________________________ From: Desmond McDowell <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 14:54 Subject: [DUMFRIES-GALLOWAY] St. Mary's Church Cemetery - Gravestone Can anyone tell me if St. Mary's Church Cemetery is online or if any photos of the gravestone have been taken. Or if someone who lives in the area would be so kind as to take a photo of the gravestone would be must appreciated. The information I have is below. Cemetery Record ID:7209 Location:    Dumfries (St. Mary's Churchyard), Dumfriesshire In Memory of Janet McKAY, wife of John DALE, stockingmaker, who died 14th July 1886 aged 75 years Also the above John DALE, stockingmaker, who died 14th January 1888 aged 79 years Also Janet McKay DALE, daughter of John DALE, stockingmaker, who died on the 30th of May 1855 aged 7 years Surname    Forenames    Death    Birth Dale        Janet McKay    1855    1848 Dale        John                    1888    1809 McKay        Janet                    1886    1811 Desmond Ontario, Canada ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message