Sorry Shelley, non of the names you've listed sound familiar to me. Best of luck on your search! Peggy Berger On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:19 AM Shelley Cardiel <cardiels@comcast.net> wrote: > I've "rescued" an old photograph of Gaynell and Lillian BRADLEY which was > taken at Harvey's Studio in Lebanon, IN. The photograph appears to have > been > taken in the 1900's with Gaynell appearing to be about 10 years old and > Lillian in her 40's at the time. Based on limited research I was able to > locate the following information regarding this family: > > > > Gaynel or Gaynell Delight BRADLEY was b. 30 Jan 1897 in Boone Co., IN to > parents John B. BRADLEY (1868-1925) and Lilly or Lillie M. DOWNING > (1870-1945). Gaynel's Father later married Viola EDWARDS (1880-1976) and > they had 6 additional children including, Mary Thelma; Paul Edward; Leander > Joseph; Harold F.; Beulah; and Ralph Raymond BRADLEY, all born between 1908 > and 1921. Gaynel died 15 Mar 1968 in Crawfordsville or Lebanon, IN. Her > Mother Lilly was the daughter of James F. DOWNING (b. 1827) and Mary Ann > WITHAM (b. 1827) who were married 28 Apr 1868 in Warren, OH. Lilly had one > sibling, a brother Sylvester DOWNING b. 1871. > > > > I am hoping to locate someone from this family so that the photograph can > be > returned to the care of family. If you are a member of this family, or you > know someone who might be, please contact me. > > > > Thanks, > > Shelley > > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

I've "rescued" an old photograph of Gaynell and Lillian BRADLEY which was taken at Harvey's Studio in Lebanon, IN. The photograph appears to have been taken in the 1900's with Gaynell appearing to be about 10 years old and Lillian in her 40's at the time. Based on limited research I was able to locate the following information regarding this family: Gaynel or Gaynell Delight BRADLEY was b. 30 Jan 1897 in Boone Co., IN to parents John B. BRADLEY (1868-1925) and Lilly or Lillie M. DOWNING (1870-1945). Gaynel's Father later married Viola EDWARDS (1880-1976) and they had 6 additional children including, Mary Thelma; Paul Edward; Leander Joseph; Harold F.; Beulah; and Ralph Raymond BRADLEY, all born between 1908 and 1921. Gaynel died 15 Mar 1968 in Crawfordsville or Lebanon, IN. Her Mother Lilly was the daughter of James F. DOWNING (b. 1827) and Mary Ann WITHAM (b. 1827) who were married 28 Apr 1868 in Warren, OH. Lilly had one sibling, a brother Sylvester DOWNING b. 1871. I am hoping to locate someone from this family so that the photograph can be returned to the care of family. If you are a member of this family, or you know someone who might be, please contact me. Thanks, Shelley

good guess, i hit the wrong address. joe downing > On July 1, 2019 at 11:49 AM Cheryl Rothwell <genealogysleuth@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I suspect the inappropriate message was an accident. The poster has been on this list since I began it. We all make mistakes. Let's move on and get back to Downing genealogy. > > Cheryl Rothwell > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Drownings are much more interesting than Politics Sent from my iPhone > On 1 Jul 2019, at 17:49, Cheryl Rothwell <genealogysleuth@gmail.com> wrote: > > I suspect the inappropriate message was an accident. The poster has been on this list since I began it. We all make mistakes. Let's move on and get back to Downing genealogy. > > Cheryl Rothwell > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

I suspect the inappropriate message was an accident. The poster has been on this list since I began it. We all make mistakes. Let's move on and get back to Downing genealogy. Cheryl Rothwell

Yes, thank you. I was responding out of some irritation, I must say. Best wishes Rowan Downing > On 1 Jul 2019, at 2:47 pm, woodsstalker <woodsstalker@ctc.net> wrote: > > Thank you. > > > > I was getting ready to drop from this mailing list as I was under the > impression this was a family research site. > > > > John > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Thank you. I was getting ready to drop from this mailing list as I was under the impression this was a family research site. John --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Political content is inappropriate for this list > On Jun 30, 2019, at 02:54, downing-request@rootsweb.com wrote: > > Send DOWNING mailing list submissions to downing@rootsweb.com > > To subscribe via email send a message with subject subscribe and body > subscribe to downing-request@rootsweb.com > > To unsubscribe via email send a message with subject unsubscribe and > body unsubscribe to downing-request@rootsweb.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > downing-owner@rootsweb.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of DOWNING digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. democrats (Joe Downing) > 2. Re: democrats (lynnrow@ozemail.com.au) > <mime-attachment> > <mime-attachment> > To contact the %(real_name)s list administrator, send an email to > %(real_name)s-admin@rootsweb.com. > > To post a message to the DOWNING mailing list -- downing@rootsweb.com, send an email to %(real_name)s@rootsweb.com. > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to %(real_name)s-request@%(host_name)s > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body of the > email with no additional text.

Dear Joe, I am not an American, but I do observe your country is in a very real mess and bringing the rest of the world down with it. Such a pity for a formerly great nation. Best wishes Rowan Downing Sent from my iPhone > On 30 Jun 2019, at 00:15, Joe Downing <wjdown@comcast.net> wrote: > > fter two nights, and four hours, of Democratic debates, it is now up to the pundits and spin doctors to convince Americans – the majority of whom did not watch the debates – which candidates won or lost. > > > Harris attacks Biden's record on race in Democratic debate's key moment > > Read more > > Clearly, this was not your parents’ Democratic party. The stars of both debates were largely “non-traditional” candidates – women and ethnic and sexual minorities. The first debate was won byElizabeth Warren https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/elizabeth-warren , who combined facts with passion. There were also breakout performances by Julián Castro and Cory Booker. The second debate was won, hands down, by Kamala Harris, with strong performances by Pete Buttigieg and Kirsten Gillibrand. We also saw (older) white men boast about their parenting, and a non-white woman and a gay man leverage their military experience. > > Still, there was some traditional gendered behavior too. There was a lot of interrupting and shouting over each other – predominantly, but not exclusively, by older white men. More than half an hour of the combined four hours of debate was wasted on mediocre white guys who poll less than one percent, and I’m not even counting the time wasted by moderator Chuck Todd pontificating rather than asking questions. > > The clear losers on stage were “traditional” candidates – white men again – most notably Beto O’Rourke andJoe Biden https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/joebiden . The main loser off stage was NBC News – not just for an embarrassing technical glitch with the microphones in the first debate, but also for the format of the debates. Together with the Democratic National Committee, NBC decided to invite far too many candidates and divide them by lot rather than support in the polls. > > This mainly hurt Warren, who ended up in Wednesday’s second-tier debate, in which the candidates represented less than 25% of the Democratic vote in current polls (most of that support is for Warren). This denied her the opportunity to face her key opponents, Biden and Sanders, head-on. > > That said, the large field also had some positive side-effects. It provided comic relief (Marianne Williamson), put climate change front and center in the first debate (Jay Inslee), and, thanks to Eric Swalwell, introduced the slogan – “pass the torch” - that will haunt Biden throughout the campaign. > > Moreover, somewhat paradoxically, having 20 candidates made the Democratic party look less divided than the three (really two) candidates in 2016. Rather than being ideologically divided, let alone polarized, the Democratic party today is fragmented – devoid of a clear leader. > > Partly for that reason, there was another unofficial, offstage winner: the Republican party, and Trump in particular. The debates saw Trump’s main challengers falter (Biden) or fade (Sanders), the second-tier perform strongly (Warren, Harris, Buttigieg), and some new challengers emerge (notably Castro and Booker). This increases the chances for a long, internally divisive, Democratic primary – allowing the Republican party to look stable and united in contrast as well as benefit from free opposition research as the Democratic candidates try to tear each other down. > > The debates also gave disproportionate attention to the plight of non-Americans, notably asylum seekers at the southern border and undocumented immigrants throughout the country. While this is understandable and even morally admirable, given the Trump administration’s inhumane immigration policies and the salience of the issue at this moment, it provides an easy opening for Republicans. > >> >> Rather than being ideologically divided, let alone polarized, the Democratic party today is fragmented >> > > This was only made worse by the moderators’ fondness for stupid “raise your hand” polls, like the one which asked candidates to raise their hands if their preferred healthcare system would cover undocumented immigrants. All did, and within seconds the internet exploded with rightwing pundits claiming that this proved Democrats care more about “aliens” than Americans. One of the people to weigh in, of course, was President Trump, who breezilytweeted https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1144419410729242625 : “All Democrats just raised their hands for giving millions of illegal aliens unlimited healthcare. How about taking care of American Citizens first!? That’s the end of that race!” > > The other reason Republicans are probably pleased with the Democratic debates is that, except for healthcare, very few topics were seriously discussed that could challenge Republicans in the heartland or mobilize Democratic voters outside of the traditional progressive base. The debate barely touched on the opioid crisis, for example, and the issue was largely reduced to punishment of big pharma rather than discussion of how to help addicts and their families. It is depressing to see the Democratic party once again ignoring this clearly progressive issue, which affectsalmost half of all Americans https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/10/31/16580738/survey-drug-addiction-opioid-epidemic in a personal way. > > There was also no serious discussion of America’s crumbling infrastructure - a particularly ripe issue for big-governmentDemocrats https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/democrats like Sanders and a huge missed opportunity, given that it is an election promise on which Trump has clearly failed to deliver. More generally, neither moderators nor candidates really addressed the broader issue of work, from the threat of automation (only Andrew Yang) through the highly salient issue of minimum wage to the explosion of the precariat in the wake of the Great Recession. > > Finally, with the exception of Ohio congressman Tim Ryan’s pseudo-populist appeal to Trump voters in the rust belt, there was no discussion of the ever-growing urban-rural divide and the plight of rural America. Republicans will undoubtedly exploit this by continuing to accuse the Democrats of being the party of coastal elites and minorities, while presenting themselves as the voice of the implicitly white “real America”. > > If the Democrats want to defeat Trump in 2020, they need to expand beyond relatively narrow progressive causes and start planning their messaging for the general election. Nothing less than the White House is at stake. > > * Cas Mudde is a Guardian US columnist and the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgi > > joe downing > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

fter two nights, and four hours, of Democratic debates, it is now up to the pundits and spin doctors to convince Americans – the majority of whom did not watch the debates – which candidates won or lost. Harris attacks Biden's record on race in Democratic debate's key moment Read more Clearly, this was not your parents’ Democratic party. The stars of both debates were largely “non-traditional” candidates – women and ethnic and sexual minorities. The first debate was won byElizabeth Warren https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/elizabeth-warren , who combined facts with passion. There were also breakout performances by Julián Castro and Cory Booker. The second debate was won, hands down, by Kamala Harris, with strong performances by Pete Buttigieg and Kirsten Gillibrand. We also saw (older) white men boast about their parenting, and a non-white woman and a gay man leverage their military experience. Still, there was some traditional gendered behavior too. There was a lot of interrupting and shouting over each other – predominantly, but not exclusively, by older white men. More than half an hour of the combined four hours of debate was wasted on mediocre white guys who poll less than one percent, and I’m not even counting the time wasted by moderator Chuck Todd pontificating rather than asking questions. The clear losers on stage were “traditional” candidates – white men again – most notably Beto O’Rourke andJoe Biden https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/joebiden . The main loser off stage was NBC News – not just for an embarrassing technical glitch with the microphones in the first debate, but also for the format of the debates. Together with the Democratic National Committee, NBC decided to invite far too many candidates and divide them by lot rather than support in the polls. This mainly hurt Warren, who ended up in Wednesday’s second-tier debate, in which the candidates represented less than 25% of the Democratic vote in current polls (most of that support is for Warren). This denied her the opportunity to face her key opponents, Biden and Sanders, head-on. That said, the large field also had some positive side-effects. It provided comic relief (Marianne Williamson), put climate change front and center in the first debate (Jay Inslee), and, thanks to Eric Swalwell, introduced the slogan – “pass the torch” - that will haunt Biden throughout the campaign. Moreover, somewhat paradoxically, having 20 candidates made the Democratic party look less divided than the three (really two) candidates in 2016. Rather than being ideologically divided, let alone polarized, the Democratic party today is fragmented – devoid of a clear leader. Partly for that reason, there was another unofficial, offstage winner: the Republican party, and Trump in particular. The debates saw Trump’s main challengers falter (Biden) or fade (Sanders), the second-tier perform strongly (Warren, Harris, Buttigieg), and some new challengers emerge (notably Castro and Booker). This increases the chances for a long, internally divisive, Democratic primary – allowing the Republican party to look stable and united in contrast as well as benefit from free opposition research as the Democratic candidates try to tear each other down. The debates also gave disproportionate attention to the plight of non-Americans, notably asylum seekers at the southern border and undocumented immigrants throughout the country. While this is understandable and even morally admirable, given the Trump administration’s inhumane immigration policies and the salience of the issue at this moment, it provides an easy opening for Republicans. > > Rather than being ideologically divided, let alone polarized, the Democratic party today is fragmented > This was only made worse by the moderators’ fondness for stupid “raise your hand” polls, like the one which asked candidates to raise their hands if their preferred healthcare system would cover undocumented immigrants. All did, and within seconds the internet exploded with rightwing pundits claiming that this proved Democrats care more about “aliens” than Americans. One of the people to weigh in, of course, was President Trump, who breezilytweeted https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1144419410729242625 : “All Democrats just raised their hands for giving millions of illegal aliens unlimited healthcare. How about taking care of American Citizens first!? That’s the end of that race!” The other reason Republicans are probably pleased with the Democratic debates is that, except for healthcare, very few topics were seriously discussed that could challenge Republicans in the heartland or mobilize Democratic voters outside of the traditional progressive base. The debate barely touched on the opioid crisis, for example, and the issue was largely reduced to punishment of big pharma rather than discussion of how to help addicts and their families. It is depressing to see the Democratic party once again ignoring this clearly progressive issue, which affectsalmost half of all Americans https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/10/31/16580738/survey-drug-addiction-opioid-epidemic in a personal way. There was also no serious discussion of America’s crumbling infrastructure - a particularly ripe issue for big-governmentDemocrats https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/democrats like Sanders and a huge missed opportunity, given that it is an election promise on which Trump has clearly failed to deliver. More generally, neither moderators nor candidates really addressed the broader issue of work, from the threat of automation (only Andrew Yang) through the highly salient issue of minimum wage to the explosion of the precariat in the wake of the Great Recession. Finally, with the exception of Ohio congressman Tim Ryan’s pseudo-populist appeal to Trump voters in the rust belt, there was no discussion of the ever-growing urban-rural divide and the plight of rural America. Republicans will undoubtedly exploit this by continuing to accuse the Democrats of being the party of coastal elites and minorities, while presenting themselves as the voice of the implicitly white “real America”. If the Democrats want to defeat Trump in 2020, they need to expand beyond relatively narrow progressive causes and start planning their messaging for the general election. Nothing less than the White House is at stake. * Cas Mudde is a Guardian US columnist and the Stanley Wade Shelton UGAF professor in the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgi joe downing

https://books.google.com/books?id=FchKAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA279#v=onepage&q&f=false Complete Baronetage: English, Irish and Scottish, 1649-1664, pg. 279 Best wishes, Mary Lou Cole -----Original Message----- From: Cheryl Rothwell [mailto:genealogysleuth@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 10:45 AM To: downing@rootsweb.com Subject: [DOWNING] Downing Street Downings Someone is looking for information on the descendants of Sir George Downing and Downing Street in London. The title is long extinct. I don't know about current descendants. I found this: https://www.history.com/news/the-surprising-history-of-10-downing-street. If you have information please post it here. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

I knew the title was extinct and I thought the line was also but I wasn't sure. I don't know how it works out with the one who married Winthrop, descendant or collateral. On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:35 AM lynnrow@ozemail.com.au < lynnrow@ozemail.com.au> wrote: > I am not aware of any descendants of Sir George. His line lasted three > generations as I recall and then became extinct. The widow of the last in > the line brought an action in about 1890 claiming money. It is reported in > the English Reports. I can find it if anybody is interested. > I am descended from one of his brothers. > > Best wishes > > Rowan Downing QC > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 5 Feb 2019, at 16:44, Cheryl Rothwell <genealogysleuth@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Someone is looking for information on the descendants of Sir George > Downing and Downing Street in London. The title is long extinct. I don't > know about current descendants. > > > > I found this: > https://www.history.com/news/the-surprising-history-of-10-downing-street. > > > > If you have information please post it here. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

I am not aware of any descendants of Sir George. His line lasted three generations as I recall and then became extinct. The widow of the last in the line brought an action in about 1890 claiming money. It is reported in the English Reports. I can find it if anybody is interested. I am descended from one of his brothers. Best wishes Rowan Downing QC Sent from my iPhone > On 5 Feb 2019, at 16:44, Cheryl Rothwell <genealogysleuth@gmail.com> wrote: > > Someone is looking for information on the descendants of Sir George Downing and Downing Street in London. The title is long extinct. I don't know about current descendants. > > I found this: https://www.history.com/news/the-surprising-history-of-10-downing-street. > > If you have information please post it here. > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Can’t help; my line is totally separate from Sir George Downing. Unless some common ancestor was building Stonehenge around 3000 B.C. LOL -- Ray Downing, Henderson, NV Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Cheryl Rothwell Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 7:47 AM To: downing@rootsweb.com Subject: [DOWNING] Downing Street Downings Someone is looking for information on the descendants of Sir George Downing and Downing Street in London. The title is long extinct. I don't know about current descendants. I found this: https://www.history.com/news/the-surprising-history-of-10-downing-street. If you have information please post it here. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Someone is looking for information on the descendants of Sir George Downing and Downing Street in London. The title is long extinct. I don't know about current descendants. I found this: https://www.history.com/news/the-surprising-history-of-10-downing-street. If you have information please post it here.

Happy Sunday! I received your test. Peggy Berger On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 7:35 AM Cheryl Rothwell <historysleuth@gmail.com> wrote: > Things are still a little wonky. This is a test. > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bit.ly_rootswebpref&d=DwIBaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QMc7Qa_nT3dzjTvTq4c7II6tIsGD8cRcPc3F0bp7BHQ&m=S3Cxi8C4Y2eRD9LcNd-df655hWHOALGQLsqyuWq_BiY&s=jPzsicuGBBZ4AUW62OomLGZy0Oil6Q1FFvL27vdVRms&e= > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ancstry.me_2JWBOdY&d=DwIBaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QMc7Qa_nT3dzjTvTq4c7II6tIsGD8cRcPc3F0bp7BHQ&m=S3Cxi8C4Y2eRD9LcNd-df655hWHOALGQLsqyuWq_BiY&s=jbWXAJZQB4ODd7wFZvLI9p4eW9LL9seqQe-d9xPMdaE&e= Terms and Conditions: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ancstry.me_2HDBym9&d=DwIBaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QMc7Qa_nT3dzjTvTq4c7II6tIsGD8cRcPc3F0bp7BHQ&m=S3Cxi8C4Y2eRD9LcNd-df655hWHOALGQLsqyuWq_BiY&s=ckY6fs83_QkH1s719osiiYdncqIsCmlGw85Hulqm0Vo&e= > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

Things are still a little wonky. This is a test.

i have posted this line (mine from Mo to Oh to Ky to MD) on rootsweb. called the Timothy Downing/Chenoweth line. it is very complete for this time frame. joe downing > On August 30, 2018 at 6:02 PM livelife0725@gmail.com wrote: > > > Hello - my name is Peggy Francis Berger. I am a decendent of Harley Downing from Ontario Wi. My mother, Arlis Downing Francis, is his daughter. She doesn't know much about his family so I thought I'd start looking for her/us. > > It looks like our Downing line was in Ontario Wi, Ohio, and the earliest I've seen was in Kentucky. > > Welcome to the Downing mailing list. Please introduce yourself and list the Downing line(s) you are researching. Names, dates and locations are very helpful. Listing your Downing basics in the subject -- Timothy Downing 1750 Maryland -- will help get the attention of other researchers. > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bit.ly_rootswebpref&d=DwICaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QMc7Qa_nT3dzjTvTq4c7II6tIsGD8cRcPc3F0bp7BHQ&m=-CFtr3LtB9cIKfb12G_gfqZsA_dmorae2Xv1TC1tqE8&s=kaeZBG8p8_sglstPN83Sp-fLCNbmfZdCIv2qHThAdl4&e= > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/downing@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ancstry.me_2JWBOdY&d=DwICaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QMc7Qa_nT3dzjTvTq4c7II6tIsGD8cRcPc3F0bp7BHQ&m=-CFtr3LtB9cIKfb12G_gfqZsA_dmorae2Xv1TC1tqE8&s=8P9Re_n8AQVT9J9xECStnnwj13L4Uai2ZT7-rePX6tc&e= Terms and Conditions: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ancstry.me_2HDBym9&d=DwICaQ&c=kKqjBR9KKWaWpMhASkPbOg&r=QMc7Qa_nT3dzjTvTq4c7II6tIsGD8cRcPc3F0bp7BHQ&m=-CFtr3LtB9cIKfb12G_gfqZsA_dmorae2Xv1TC1tqE8&s=7GNbBVoR0URX7Q6iJxRFwbyryTVUe4-ozpCPfvODR-M&e= > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Hello - my name is Peggy Francis Berger. I am a decendent of Harley Downing from Ontario Wi. My mother, Arlis Downing Francis, is his daughter. She doesn't know much about his family so I thought I'd start looking for her/us. It looks like our Downing line was in Ontario Wi, Ohio, and the earliest I've seen was in Kentucky. Welcome to the Downing mailing list. Please introduce yourself and list the Downing line(s) you are researching. Names, dates and locations are very helpful. Listing your Downing basics in the subject -- Timothy Downing 1750 Maryland -- will help get the attention of other researchers.

Friendly service. Speedy delivery! ENTER HERE