Very good...there have been some notices of other changes as well in regard to the reporting of GENO2. The entire community in addition to R-M222 were somewhat alarmed and FTDNA did get feed back from a plethora of people and groups. I am happy that they are using the feed back to improve things. In regard to SNP testing, our R-M222 haplogroup project is more aware of what is going on with R-M222 than other groups and the vendors at the moment although some of the vendors are more aware than others. If project members and others have questions, it may be best to bring them to the list. If none on the list or those among us that are working the data have the answers, most of us will go the extra steps to learn more. None of us may claim that we know it all, but I believe we may say that we take your information, consider it against the evidences of SNPs and STRs, and the testing there of that we have, and relate what we think the possibilities are in addition to saying what does or doesn't make sense. Susan On 4/29/2014 12:33 PM, Kyle DePew wrote: > Correction: I see now that I am listed as Z70-. > > >