I'm one of the supposed Z70+ individuals, and over the last couple months narrowed down my matches to a couple of families named Feeney and Connolly that carry most or all of my off-modals over 67 markers. (All of these individuals are from Connemara according to the kit administrators and none of them are in the M222 Project, if I remember correctly.) At least one of these Feeneys had Geno 2.0 testing and, though I haven't seen his actual file, his list of positive SNPs does not include Z70. I would think maybe Z70 under M222 is unreliable as well? Kyle On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:29 AM, David Maclennan < david.maclennan@utoronto.ca> wrote: > David, can you please check the CTS12773+ status of the others > misrepresented as CTS12173+ (I am CTS12773+). We have had at least one > case in this forum of typos that caused confusion, so that is a potential > explanation of what happened at ftDNA. > David > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

That is possible, but I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss its potential significance. I see that you have a GD of 0/67 and 3/111 from a man named Gray. If there was a possibility of a SNP match, I would think this man would be a test candidate for both DF105 and Z70, David Wilson -----Original Message----- From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Kyle DePew Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 2:39 PM To: dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com; dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [R-M222] The 24 FTDNA SNPs below M222; Locations proposed for PF3292 and Z70, and rough locations for others. I'm one of the supposed Z70+ individuals, and over the last couple months narrowed down my matches to a couple of families named Feeney and Connolly that carry most or all of my off-modals over 67 markers. (All of these individuals are from Connemara according to the kit administrators and none of them are in the M222 Project, if I remember correctly.) At least one of these Feeneys had Geno 2.0 testing and, though I haven't seen his actual file, his list of positive SNPs does not include Z70. I would think maybe Z70 under M222 is unreliable as well? Kyle