As some of you may know, one of the first human genomes to be sequenced was Jay Flatley who is CEO of Illumina, and his data is in the public domain. I just checked with Greg Magoon and Andy Grierson who I believe used this data in one of their papers and they have confirmed that Flatley is S661/DF104+, S659/DF105+ and negative for all downstream branches. He will appear on the next upload of the tree. Flatley is supposed to be Uí Fiachrach but then again so is Coyne who is FGC4078+, S659/DF105-... Iain
Good to know. Was it (or can it be) determined that Flatley is also DF109/S660+? It's a long shot, but I was wondering if he would split the S659/S660 equivalence. David W. -----Original Message----- From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Iain Kennedy Sent: Friday, May 2, 2014 11:19 AM To: dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com; dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com Subject: [R-M222] Flatley/Uí Fiachrach As some of you may know, one of the first human genomes to be sequenced was Jay Flatley who is CEO of Illumina, and his data is in the public domain. I just checked with Greg Magoon and Andy Grierson who I believe used this data in one of their papers and they have confirmed that Flatley is S661/DF104+, S659/DF105+ and negative for all downstream branches. He will appear on the next upload of the tree. Flatley is supposed to be Uí Fiachrach but then again so is Coyne who is FGC4078+, S659/DF105-... Iain ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Interesting. Hopefully once my Chromo2 results come in, we get more info as I should be Ui Fiachrach [Lachna being brother to the Mac Firbisigh in the 11th century. John On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Iain Kennedy <ikennedy_msdn2@hotmail.com>wrote: > As some of you may know, one of the first human genomes to be sequenced > was Jay Flatley who is CEO of Illumina, and his data is in the public > domain. I just checked with Greg Magoon and Andy Grierson who I believe > used this data in one of their papers and they have confirmed that Flatley > is S661/DF104+, S659/DF105+ and negative for all downstream branches. He > will appear on the next upload of the tree. > > Flatley is supposed to be Uí Fiachrach but then again so is Coyne who is > FGC4078+, S659/DF105-... > > Iain > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >