RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [R-M222] Tree update
    2. Paul Conroy
    3. Iain, Thanks to you and all the other collaborators for getting this far. Is it possible to get an updated tree, with just the branch labels and SNP's? I'm going to try and get a few more people to test for the SNP just above PF1169, which is S566? I'm also try and get more of my private SNP's listed by YSEQ, as then people who are positive can for S566, can then begin to test for these. As many of you know, PF1169 has been deemed too hard to create a single SNP (Sanger Sequencing) test for, as it is in a highly repetitive area of the Y-chromosome. Cheers, Paul On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, john.loughney@gmail.com < john.loughney@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for this, the tree is definitely looking interesting. For us S600+ > DF85- folks with Chromo 2 tests, are the recommended SNPs A259, A260, S588, > A223, A224, A225, ... for a total of (at least) 6 SNPs to test? > > I think I am going to bite the bullet ... > > thanks, > John > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Iain Kennedy <ikennedy_msdn2@hotmail.com > > > wrote: > > > I have now managed to get hold of enough data and permissions to upload a > > new tree with the following changes > > > > 1. FGC4087 has now been merged with FGC4077 and FGC4078 > > 2. The FGC12948 branch linking Wilson and Sheridan has been added > > underneath > > 3. Four people have been moved under FGC8739 which is under DF97: McKee > > B4398, Donaldson, McConnaughhay 205297 and Dowell > > 4. Dunbar 205549 has been added under S7814 (he is F1265-), he shares no > > markers with Hamilton on first look > > 5. O'Donnell 329279 is now under DF97 > > 6. Moody 565 and Braswell 230303 appear to have the same combination of > > A259+, A260+ but no report for FGC5939.2 as does O'Shaughnessy so I have > > put the three of them together provisionally, pending a review of the raw > > data to confirm the ancestral status for FGC5939. > > > > I would hope that those who got an S660 as their terminal SNP from > Chromo2 > > or FTDNA/YSEQ but have NO sequencing results would be testing these new > > branches. All the sub-branches of S660 are on sale at shop.YSEQ.net. As > > explained previously, if you DID do a BigY or FGC test you should already > > know your status for them, although if you haven't got a BAM file and > > shared it with me that may still be awaiting final proof. > > > > The other big block that needs breaking up is DF97 and there you can test > > FGC8739. > > > > http://www.kennedydna.com/M222.pdf > > > > Iain > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    05/29/2014 09:08:11
    1. Re: [R-M222] Tree update
    2. Paul Ó Duḃṫaiġ
    3. Paul, Iain has a "Label only version" of his tree, though I don't know when it was last updated see here: http://www.kennedydna.com/M222_tree.png -Paul (DF41+) On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Paul Conroy <pconroy63@gmail.com> wrote: > Iain, > > Thanks to you and all the other collaborators for getting this far. > > Is it possible to get an updated tree, with just the branch labels and > SNP's? I'm going to try and get a few more people to test for the SNP just > above PF1169, which is S566? I'm also try and get more of my private SNP's > listed by YSEQ, as then people who are positive can for S566, can then > begin to test for these. > > As many of you know, PF1169 has been deemed too hard to create a single SNP > (Sanger Sequencing) test for, as it is in a highly repetitive area of the > Y-chromosome. > > Cheers, > Paul > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, john.loughney@gmail.com < > john.loughney@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for this, the tree is definitely looking interesting. For us > S600+ > > DF85- folks with Chromo 2 tests, are the recommended SNPs A259, A260, > S588, > > A223, A224, A225, ... for a total of (at least) 6 SNPs to test? > > > > I think I am going to bite the bullet ... > > > > thanks, > > John > > > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Iain Kennedy < > ikennedy_msdn2@hotmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > I have now managed to get hold of enough data and permissions to > upload a > > > new tree with the following changes > > > > > > 1. FGC4087 has now been merged with FGC4077 and FGC4078 > > > 2. The FGC12948 branch linking Wilson and Sheridan has been added > > > underneath > > > 3. Four people have been moved under FGC8739 which is under DF97: McKee > > > B4398, Donaldson, McConnaughhay 205297 and Dowell > > > 4. Dunbar 205549 has been added under S7814 (he is F1265-), he shares > no > > > markers with Hamilton on first look > > > 5. O'Donnell 329279 is now under DF97 > > > 6. Moody 565 and Braswell 230303 appear to have the same combination of > > > A259+, A260+ but no report for FGC5939.2 as does O'Shaughnessy so I > have > > > put the three of them together provisionally, pending a review of the > raw > > > data to confirm the ancestral status for FGC5939. > > > > > > I would hope that those who got an S660 as their terminal SNP from > > Chromo2 > > > or FTDNA/YSEQ but have NO sequencing results would be testing these new > > > branches. All the sub-branches of S660 are on sale at shop.YSEQ.net. > As > > > explained previously, if you DID do a BigY or FGC test you should > already > > > know your status for them, although if you haven't got a BAM file and > > > shared it with me that may still be awaiting final proof. > > > > > > The other big block that needs breaking up is DF97 and there you can > test > > > FGC8739. > > > > > > http://www.kennedydna.com/M222.pdf > > > > > > Iain > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > > DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the > > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    05/29/2014 05:20:05