Byrne kit # 227877 Chromo2 results is S7072+ S7073+ S568+ PF1169+ S567- I have copy of part of Paul Conroy's FGC report. There is a notation for variant + 14408586 G C with G being ancestral and C being derived According to YSEQ S568 position is: HG19:14408566..14408586 If I'm reading Paul's report correctly, he is also positive for S568, I should be checked on this. If I am reading his report correctly, then it is confirmed by Byrne coming out of Chromo2. I checked the BISDNA CZ2000 spreadsheet. In it I noticed no other S568+ being positive for PF1169 (may be an old file) I've been busy in attempt to verify all of this; none the less I'm bringing this to your attention now. I have suggestion that all who have been derived for PF1169 either do Chromo2 or single SNP test with YSEQ for S568. If there are consistent results across the board and IF I read Paul Conroy's FGC correctly then it may well be that PF1169 sits under S568 and either above or parallell to S567. Please, Iain and others double check what I have represented above. I will forward on the Byrne Chromo2 result to Iain shortly. Susan Hedeen
That's very interesting. Thank you for the report. I know where my next hour (at least) is going to be spent. David Wilson -----Original Message----- From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susan Hedeen Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 11:49 AM To: dna-r1b1c7; Iain Kennedy; Susan Hedeen; dna-r1b1c7; Iain Kennedy; Susan Hedeen Subject: [R-M222] PF1169 news Byrne kit # 227877 Chromo2 results is S7072+ S7073+ S568+ PF1169+ S567- I have copy of part of Paul Conroy's FGC report. There is a notation for variant + 14408586 G C with G being ancestral and C being derived According to YSEQ S568 position is: HG19:14408566..14408586 If I'm reading Paul's report correctly, he is also positive for S568, I should be checked on this. If I am reading his report correctly, then it is confirmed by Byrne coming out of Chromo2. I checked the BISDNA CZ2000 spreadsheet. In it I noticed no other S568+ being positive for PF1169 (may be an old file) I've been busy in attempt to verify all of this; none the less I'm bringing this to your attention now. I have suggestion that all who have been derived for PF1169 either do Chromo2 or single SNP test with YSEQ for S568. If there are consistent results across the board and IF I read Paul Conroy's FGC correctly then it may well be that PF1169 sits under S568 and either above or parallell to S567. Please, Iain and others double check what I have represented above. I will forward on the Byrne Chromo2 result to Iain shortly. Susan Hedeen ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message