Odd that this got overlooked by everyone (!) but it does look now as if Paul shares two of the Howard Lamont SNPs since as well as S568 he has S566. This are the relevant lines from a join between Paul C's variants and the Chromo2 table: b37 position Reference allele Sample allele dbSNP rsID Named variant status Reliability warning level Samples sharing variant hg19 chromo2ID alias type ref alt Flags Field8 Field9 Field10 Field11 14408586 G C FGC451+ 14408586 S568 S568 SNP G C M222 15719082 G A FGC453+ 15719082 S566 S566 SNP G A The Lamont SNPs are S555-S567 with S568 the branch marker. Iain > From: dcw1000@live.com > To: ChantillyCarpets@earthlink.net; dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com; ikennedy_msdn2@hotmail.com > Subject: RE: [R-M222] PF1169 news > Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 12:12:49 -0700 > > That's very interesting. Thank you for the report. I know where my next > hour (at least) is going to be spent. > > David Wilson > > -----Original Message----- > From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susan Hedeen > Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 11:49 AM > To: dna-r1b1c7; Iain Kennedy; Susan Hedeen; dna-r1b1c7; Iain Kennedy; Susan > Hedeen > Subject: [R-M222] PF1169 news > > Byrne kit # 227877 Chromo2 results is S7072+ S7073+ S568+ PF1169+ S567- > > I have copy of part of Paul Conroy's FGC report. > There is a notation for variant + 14408586 G C with G being > ancestral and C being derived > > According to YSEQ S568 position is: HG19:14408566..14408586 > > If I'm reading Paul's report correctly, he is also positive for S568, I > should be checked on this. If I am reading his report correctly, then it is > confirmed by Byrne coming out of Chromo2. > > I checked the BISDNA CZ2000 spreadsheet. In it I noticed no other S568+ > being positive for PF1169 (may be an old file) > > I've been busy in attempt to verify all of this; none the less I'm bringing > this to your attention now. > > I have suggestion that all who have been derived for PF1169 either do > Chromo2 or single SNP test with > YSEQ for S568. > > If there are consistent results across the board and IF I read Paul Conroy's > FGC correctly then it may well be that > PF1169 sits under S568 and either above or parallell to S567. > > Please, Iain and others double check what I have represented above. I will > forward on the Byrne Chromo2 result to Iain shortly. > > Susan Hedeen > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message