Agreed! Susan On 5/21/2014 2:29 AM, Iain Kennedy wrote: > Progress is going to be limited if she can't test all the latest NGS SNPs at yseq but if that is the only route I would start with S659 or DF105 as they are calling it and take it from there. > > > Iain > > > > > >> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 23:10:20 -0700 >> From: john.loughney@gmail.com >> To: dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com >> Subject: [R-M222] Advise for testing on McLaughlin >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have been talking to someone admingin kit 317948 , I have a match with >> a Mr. Richard McLaughlin. The kit is being administered by his sister, as >> she is the genealogist. She stated that she might not be able to get >> another sample from him, but she has done a 37 step test at FTDNA, and >> wanting to know what would be the best options to move forward. I think >> doing testing on the current FTDNA sample would be the best. Should she go >> to 111 steps, should she get specific SNP tests? Her brother is M222+ and >> two steps from me at 25. >> >> Here comment on her paper trail is: "My McLaughlin’s – as far back as I >> have been able to trace (early 1800’s) came from the Carncastle (Larne) >> area of Co. Antrim." >> >> Any suggestions on what she could do going forward? >> >> John >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >