I have now managed to get hold of enough data and permissions to upload a new tree with the following changes 1. FGC4087 has now been merged with FGC4077 and FGC4078 2. The FGC12948 branch linking Wilson and Sheridan has been added underneath 3. Four people have been moved under FGC8739 which is under DF97: McKee B4398, Donaldson, McConnaughhay 205297 and Dowell 4. Dunbar 205549 has been added under S7814 (he is F1265-), he shares no markers with Hamilton on first look 5. O'Donnell 329279 is now under DF97 6. Moody 565 and Braswell 230303 appear to have the same combination of A259+, A260+ but no report for FGC5939.2 as does O'Shaughnessy so I have put the three of them together provisionally, pending a review of the raw data to confirm the ancestral status for FGC5939. I would hope that those who got an S660 as their terminal SNP from Chromo2 or FTDNA/YSEQ but have NO sequencing results would be testing these new branches. All the sub-branches of S660 are on sale at shop.YSEQ.net. As explained previously, if you DID do a BigY or FGC test you should already know your status for them, although if you haven't got a BAM file and shared it with me that may still be awaiting final proof. The other big block that needs breaking up is DF97 and there you can test FGC8739. http://www.kennedydna.com/M222.pdf Iain

Thanks for this, the tree is definitely looking interesting. For us S600+ DF85- folks with Chromo 2 tests, are the recommended SNPs A259, A260, S588, A223, A224, A225, ... for a total of (at least) 6 SNPs to test? I think I am going to bite the bullet ... thanks, John On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Iain Kennedy <ikennedy_msdn2@hotmail.com> wrote: > I have now managed to get hold of enough data and permissions to upload a > new tree with the following changes > > 1. FGC4087 has now been merged with FGC4077 and FGC4078 > 2. The FGC12948 branch linking Wilson and Sheridan has been added > underneath > 3. Four people have been moved under FGC8739 which is under DF97: McKee > B4398, Donaldson, McConnaughhay 205297 and Dowell > 4. Dunbar 205549 has been added under S7814 (he is F1265-), he shares no > markers with Hamilton on first look > 5. O'Donnell 329279 is now under DF97 > 6. Moody 565 and Braswell 230303 appear to have the same combination of > A259+, A260+ but no report for FGC5939.2 as does O'Shaughnessy so I have > put the three of them together provisionally, pending a review of the raw > data to confirm the ancestral status for FGC5939. > > I would hope that those who got an S660 as their terminal SNP from Chromo2 > or FTDNA/YSEQ but have NO sequencing results would be testing these new > branches. All the sub-branches of S660 are on sale at shop.YSEQ.net. As > explained previously, if you DID do a BigY or FGC test you should already > know your status for them, although if you haven't got a BAM file and > shared it with me that may still be awaiting final proof. > > The other big block that needs breaking up is DF97 and there you can test > FGC8739. > > http://www.kennedydna.com/M222.pdf > > Iain > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

> 6. Moody 565 and Braswell 230303 appear to have the same combination of A259+, A260+ but no report for FGC5939.2 as does O'Shaughnessy so I have put the three of them together provisionally, pending a review of the raw data to confirm the ancestral status for FGC5939. O'Hart's work has a pedigree for a Moody family which makes them descents of Aedh Slaine of the Southern Ui Neill. O'Shaughnessy in turn have a pedigree that makes them Ui Fiachrach.  Interesting pairing?