We already know that as per the post from Sandy I reposted yesterday which listed all the SNPs found in himself and Howard and the original M222 tree diagram Jim Wilson gave out which gives S568 as a branch marker with S555-S567 (NB not 'S555/S567') the range of SNPs underneath. http://www.kennedydna.com/M222_2013Dec16.jpg Iain > From: david.maclennan@utoronto.ca > To: ChantillyCarpets@earthlink.net; dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com > Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 23:03:12 +0000 > Subject: Re: [R-M222] PF1169 news > > It seems that we need to know where S566 fits into the tree in order to > understand where PF1169 lies. Can someone in the know please comment now > on where S566 is thought to be located relative to S568 and S555/567? > Bernard is pointing out that S566 is probably under S568 and above PF1169. > Is this the case? > David > > > On 2014-05-01, 4:09 PM, "Susan Hedeen" <chantillycarpets@earthlink.net> > wrote: > > >Yes, Byrne is S566+ > > > >On 5/1/2014 4:02 PM, Bernard Morgan wrote: > >> I am a little lost: > >> > >> > >> Lamont, Bremmer, Byrne, Conroy are all S568/DF106+ > >> Lamont, Conroy only are S566+ > >> Lamont, is also S555-S567 postive, not Conroy > >> > >> Byrne, Conroy are also PF1169+ > >> > >> So Byrne must also be S566+ or Lamont is PF1169+? > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------- > >> > > > > > >------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > >DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message