A side note: DF106 is another name for S658, not S568, so the DF106 reference is incorrect in this context. David W. -----Original Message----- From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Bernard Morgan Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 1:03 PM To: dna-r1b1c7; dna-r1b1c7 Subject: Re: [R-M222] PF1169 news I am a little lost: Lamont, Bremmer, Byrne, Conroy are all S568/DF106+ Lamont, Conroy only are S566+ Lamont, is also S555-S567 postive, not Conroy Byrne, Conroy are also PF1169+ So Byrne must also be S566+ or Lamont is PF1169+?

Both Byrne and Conroy are S566+ From Paul's FGC file: + 15719082 G A where G is Ancestral and A is derived. 15719082 is S566 according to the BISDNA submitted positions for Chromo2. Susan Lamont, Bremmer, Byrne, Conroy are all S568+ Lamont, Conroy only are S566+ Lamont, is also S555-S567 postive, not Conroy Byrne, Conroy are also PF1169+ So Byrne must also be S566+ or Lamont is PF1169+? ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message