Does anyone know if the test results were shared with the test takers during NatGeo's field trip to Mayo? Sent from my Nokia Lumia phone -----Original Message----- From: "Iain Kennedy" <[email protected]> Sent: ‎11/‎11/‎2013 2:54 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [R-M222] M222 in Mayo 80% is a staggering figure. But on the subject of Mayo I was under the impression they have done a special field trip there as opposed to neutral sampling by county all over the country? I could be wrong though. Iain > Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:47:37 +0000 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [R-M222] M222 in Mayo > > Looking at my often hard to read notes, I do not find (nor recall) that Dr. Vilar said M222 had the highest diversity in Mayo. Frequency perhaps. I think he said they tested 105 men and 80% were M222. This should be clarified on the Natioonal Genographic site and blog soon. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message