Just received my RawC2 kit today and just mailed it back this afternoon. I got my kit from "Ireland's DNA", but since it and "Scotland's DNA" and "Britain's DNA" are all affiliates of BSIDNA the distinction between the three is irrelevant - correct? I have opted to wait on the Big Y until I see the Chromo2 results. Bob Doherty FTDNA kit 29142 M222+ DF85+ DF97+ Geno2 transferred to FTDNA Sent from my iPhone

Yes, I agree. Perhaps for ease of reference the name could be reduced to BISDNA, EISDNA or something like that? I, for one, prefer a single name of reference, please! On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Robert Doherty <[email protected]>wrote: > Just received my RawC2 kit today and just mailed it back this afternoon. > > I got my kit from "Ireland's DNA", but since it and "Scotland's DNA" and > "Britain's DNA" are all affiliates of BSIDNA the distinction between the > three is irrelevant - correct? > > I have opted to wait on the Big Y until I see the Chromo2 results. > > Bob Doherty > FTDNA kit 29142 > M222+ DF85+ DF97+ > Geno2 transferred to FTDNA > > Sent from my iPhone > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Other people are referring to the conglomeration as BISDNA (for British Isles DNA). It took me a while to figure out they were doing but it works for me. On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:53 PM, tuulen <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I agree. > > Perhaps for ease of reference the name could be reduced to BISDNA, EISDNA > or something like that? I, for one, prefer a single name of reference, > please! > >

I normally refer to them as ScotlandsDNA or ScoDNA for short, although if I were to send a kit to Ireland I might use the IrelandsDNA box. The 'BISDNA' tag sounds awful in my view. Iain > Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:53:49 -0500 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [R-M222] Chromo2 > > Yes, I agree. > > Perhaps for ease of reference the name could be reduced to BISDNA, EISDNA > or something like that? I, for one, prefer a single name of reference, > please! > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Robert Doherty > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Just received my RawC2 kit today and just mailed it back this afternoon. > > > > I got my kit from "Ireland's DNA", but since it and "Scotland's DNA" and > > "Britain's DNA" are all affiliates of BSIDNA the distinction between the > > three is irrelevant - correct? > > > > I have opted to wait on the Big Y until I see the Chromo2 results. > > > > Bob Doherty > > FTDNA kit 29142 > > M222+ DF85+ DF97+ > > Geno2 transferred to FTDNA > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message