Susan your comment: > Our own Iain Kennedy may be interested in the initial BigY raw results > performing the function for M222's BigY that Mark Jost is for the L21 > FGC results. Iain has already volunteered to do same with Chromo2. I > noticed DW has joined Mark with his FGC results, but I think there are > only 3 FGC results...is that correct?...and those circumstances are > somewhat different than what we will have with both Chromo2 and BigY. We know for certain that Our Own Iain is interested in the Full Y results, has he not given us a great deal of proof while working with the tree he is maintaining for all of us, been discussed several times, I don't think Iain has said he'll be developing any SNPs for singleton tests. We don't need to be divisive in these matters. Linda

Linda, I'm not understanding your comment in response to discussions on possible approaches to the assessments regarding FTDNA's Big Y...that is what we are discussing? Susan On 11/22/2013 1:28 PM, Linda McKee wrote: > Susan your comment: > >> Our own Iain Kennedy may be interested in the initial BigY raw results >> performing the function for M222's BigY that Mark Jost is for the L21 >> FGC results. Iain has already volunteered to do same with Chromo2. I >> noticed DW has joined Mark with his FGC results, but I think there are >> only 3 FGC results...is that correct?...and those circumstances are >> somewhat different than what we will have with both Chromo2 and BigY. > > We know for certain that Our Own Iain is interested in the Full Y > results, has he not given us a great deal of proof while working with > the tree he is maintaining for all of us, been discussed several times, > I don't think Iain has said he'll be developing any SNPs for singleton > tests. > > We don't need to be divisive in these matters. > > Linda > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >