I need to ask list members who correspond with large numbers of individuals simultaneously NOT to include the R-M222 list as part of that conversation. The RootsWeb mail filters half strangle on TO fields that include lots of addresses. When a recipient replies with REPLY TO ALL, the mail filters stumble again because not all recipients of the original email are subscribers to this list. PF1169 is absolutely a proper topic of discussion for this list, but the current conversation includes a few comments that might have been better addressed to individuals in the recipient list, not the whole world. If the PF1169 discussion is to continue, I'd like to ask individuals to submit a completely new post rather using a REPLY feature. If you feel it is proper to reply to all the named individuals in TO or CC fields, please delete the email address for this RootsWeb List from the field of recipients before hitting SEND. I'm to blame for part of the current flood of PF1169 posts. Earlier this morning I mistakenly accepted for posting some filtered messages that in retrospect it would have been wiser to block. By all means keep talking about PF1169. But please submit new posts on the topic from this point on and, where appropriate, reply to those new threads rather than replying to the ones that have come in up until now. Many thanks. David Wilson