I am sorry to say I don't trust this classification. There is no green color coding for the SNP, and the lack of green means (or has historically meant) that it is not the result of a positive test. On the individual's haplotree, it is color coded as "presumed positive." In the absence of a clear statement from FTDNA concerning assigned or projected terminal SNPs in individuals who appear to be untested, I would resist accepting the accuracy of this assignment. I remember too well the flurry of incorrect SNP reports and bad classifications that followed the initial release of the current YCC/Geno 2.0 tree. David -----Original Message----- From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of McKee Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:21 AM To: dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com; dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com Subject: [R-M222] R-F3952 SNP positive results Working on the project excel just now and found 115251 with the assignment of R-F3952. Matches 235771 for 34/37. Matches 171920 who is DF97 positive 33/37. I found no record on the 115251 for testing this SNP at FTDNA so must be otherwise ;-) but this assignment of the new SNP on the project excel is perhaps a first of this nature by FTDNA without the member having ordered and tested. Hopefully, a good sign of great things to come. Apologies for not mentioning surnames (as I very much prefer to do) as I don't want to be singled out at Houston again. It's someone else's turn. ;-) Linda ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message