Indeed, although this one is bizarre even by their standards - he doesn't look anything like Mitchell, for example, so why pick this SNP? Iain > From: dcw1000@live.com > To: dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com > Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 22:48:57 -0700 > Subject: Re: [R-M222] R-F3952 SNP positive results > > I am sorry to say I don't trust this classification. There is no green color > coding for the SNP, and the lack of green means (or has historically meant) > that it is not the result of a positive test. On the individual's haplotree, > it is color coded as "presumed positive." > > In the absence of a clear statement from FTDNA concerning assigned or > projected terminal SNPs in individuals who appear to be untested, I would > resist accepting the accuracy of this assignment. I remember too well the > flurry of incorrect SNP reports and bad classifications that followed the > initial release of the current YCC/Geno 2.0 tree. > > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of McKee > Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:21 AM > To: dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com; dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com > Subject: [R-M222] R-F3952 SNP positive results > > Working on the project excel just now and found 115251 with the assignment > of R-F3952. >

They must have put Mitch's and my strs through their prediction programme and that's what's come out. Is there a technical problem with the mail list or is it my e mail?I only seem to be getting about half the messages sent to me out of the ones that appear on the mail list website. Just incase my last message wasn't sent , there are also 3 others designated as R-F3952 who match me at 37 with a gd of 3, a McGrath, Morley and a Ferguson. Rob Sent from my iPhone > On 15 Jun 2014, at 16:36, Iain Kennedy <ikennedy_msdn2@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Indeed, although this one is bizarre even by their standards - he doesn't look anything like Mitchell, for example, so why pick this SNP? > > Iain > > >> From: dcw1000@live.com >> To: dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com >> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 22:48:57 -0700 >> Subject: Re: [R-M222] R-F3952 SNP positive results >> >> I am sorry to say I don't trust this classification. There is no green color >> coding for the SNP, and the lack of green means (or has historically meant) >> that it is not the result of a positive test. On the individual's haplotree, >> it is color coded as "presumed positive." >> >> In the absence of a clear statement from FTDNA concerning assigned or >> projected terminal SNPs in individuals who appear to be untested, I would >> resist accepting the accuracy of this assignment. I remember too well the >> flurry of incorrect SNP reports and bad classifications that followed the >> initial release of the current YCC/Geno 2.0 tree. >> >> David >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com >> [mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of McKee >> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:21 AM >> To: dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com; dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com >> Subject: [R-M222] R-F3952 SNP positive results >> >> Working on the project excel just now and found 115251 with the assignment >> of R-F3952. > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message