In a message dated 7/8/2011 11:35:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time, weh8@verizon.net writes: Let values on the latter site are wrong. They are crucial since they are very slow mutators, hence are valuable for analysis of the phylogenetic tree at high values of RCC. I think someone needs to look into the details of how the clanmaclochlainn values were done. It surely needs correction for those two markers. Someone sent me a new version of that file which I never got around to posting online but in it the values at the markers mentioned match your own. I don't know what happened in the first version. I'll try and get the new ones online when I get a chance. DYS454 AlleleCountPercent 11 607 99.8% 12 10 .2% DYS426 AlleleCountPercent 11 10 .2% 12 635 99.5% 13 20 .3% John