RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [R-M222] 111-Marker results
    2. Marie Kerr
    3. Thank you; this looks very interesting. However, I don't fully understand the meaning of the table: 1. When the kit name is in the same row as itself, Column E, "GD over 111 markers" always = 0. I think I get that. 2. The last column, F, "Number of off-modal matches over 111 markers" has a value (my father's = 8), but I'm not sure what this means. Could you please explain this? 3. Does column E (GD over 111 markers) suggest the order of presumed consanguinity between my father and the other person? For example, is Coyne, Kit # N32460, the closest relationship to my father? Its value = 9 and the next one = 13. 4. What is the relationship between columns E and F? Does the "GD over 111 markers" (column E) of the person next to my father refer to the differences between my father and the other person or is it just associated with that person? 5. I assume a "9" in column E trumps a 13, but what is the difference between a 15/0 vs. a 15/2 in columns E and F? in this example, the15/2 comes before the 15/0, so I'm wondering how to interpret this. Some of our group are so profoundly experienced in all of this that they may forget that the newbies/less academic among us are not up to their level of understanding. If you can shed light on the linked 111-marker results I would greatly appreciate it. Marie Golden Kerr (on behalf of James J. Golden, kit #35946) -----Original Message----- From: dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:dna-r1b1c7-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Paterson Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 5:54 AM To: dna-r1b1c7@rootsweb.com Subject: [R-M222] 111-Marker results I've just done an update of 111-marker results for M222 and have posted a file at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2733445/OMM111.csv It's a comma-separated file that uploads into Excel. The columns are Surname Kit number Surname Kit number GD over 111 markers Number of off-modal matches over 111 markers There are now plenty McGonigals and variants, and I see there's a Fuller that seems quite close to them. This time I've included Hannan, and instead of excluding Burns because of the null value for one of his markers, I've changed the zero to 11. Apart from Fuller, there may also be a link between McKenzie 26794 and McGonigal from pre-surname times. Sandy R1b1c7 Research and Links: http://clanmaclochlainn.com/R1b1c7/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/19/2011 02:20:13