This is an example of exactly what I was saying in the other thread - people need to be SNP tested to determine if they are M222+ or not. We can't just rely on STR's alone. My question is, how many other people who tested with FTDNA, and who do not "appear" to be M222+ - based on STR's - are actually M222+ On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:29 PM, <Lochlan@aol.com> wrote: > By the way, the 12 marker Turner sample is being upgraded to 37 markers. > We'll see how the rest of the markers match up soon. > > > > John > R1b1c7 Research and Links: > > http://clanmaclochlainn.com/R1b1c7/ > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DNA-R1B1C7-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >