I just mentioned the following, which CALLS for my very immediate clarification: "Carl's [Dunn's] remarks last year were not withoutr some criticism off-Line to me, but I now must go back and see just why....never fear---no names involved!" I do NOT mean to create unnecessary controversy in this forum, Dunn was in NO way ever critical to me, or my vice versa....My only clumsy attempt here above was to note that one or two folks on this list (not the "list-owner") did indeed question Mr. Dunn's listed conclusions last year, criticisms I thought worthy but was still far too ignorant to raise myself here....NOW, this would have all been unnecessary altogether, and we all would have been much further along with this matter had we all had more COURAGE in debating these issues forthrightly, on this LIST, in respectful "back & forth"---That is what the LIST exists for! If you think I'm a nutty "crock" then say you reasons (based on factula representations only PLEASE!). I'll be grateful to debate the matter...PERHAPS I'm even WRONG, gasp! But we won't get to the bottom of it with the sort of response I got to my many 'outrageous' ('courageous')theories & ideas presented last year, ...which was basically no response whatever, but from the occasional Mr. Dunn, in this forum anyway, ...which has since been ignored by all for almost the past year...YES unfortunately, this List was of virtually NO help to me, where I otherwise once thought it could be absolutely invaluable. Let's see some debate---perhaps I won't much like that debate, but it could help us all arrive at the truth far more quickly than my traipsing back & forth to England! So, Good Work, Carl! STSquires attempt was simply to