I Margaret, following on from what Joy has found, believe this to be thhe same family in the 1851 Census. RG number: HO107 Piece:1907 Folio:255 Page:25 Reg. District:St Austell Sub District:St Austell Parish:St Austell Enum. District:1Q Ecclesiastical District: City/Municipal Borough: Address:Old West Turnpike, St Austell County:Cornwall Name Relation Condition Sex Age Birth Year Occupation , Disability Where Born ENGLAND, Elizabeth Wife Married F 71 1780 Cordwainer's Wife Perranzebulow, Cornwall ENGLAND, Humphry Son Unmarried M 28 1823 Tailor & Clothes Seller Padstow, Cornwall LYTTON, William Lodger Married M 35 1816 Hatter Carlisle, Cumberland LYTTON, Elizabeth Lodger Married F 31 1820 Hatter's Wife Hatherleigh, Devonshire LYTTON, Jane Lodger F 11 1840 Hatter's Daughter Deaf & Blind Colchester, Essex LYTTON, Mary Ann Lodger F 1 (1 YRS 9 MOS) 1850 Hatter's Daughter Newcastle upon Tyne PINCH, Julius Lodger Unmarried M 32 1819 Panssea BURBERRY, Mary Ann Lodger Married F 22 1829 St Austell, Cornwall VERCOE, David Lodger Unmarried M 37 1814 St Ewe, Cornwall On 09/01/2014 13:07, Joy Langdon wrote: > Hello Margaret, > > I have just found the marriage on Find My Past and I think it confirms that the 1871 census sighting is correct because Mary Ann's address at the time of the wedding is 5 Stoke Hill and Stoke Hill is where she and Elizabeth are in 1871. Also, the witnesses are G. Watson and Mary(?) Watson; I have been unable to trace the Michael Watts visiting in the 1871 census, perhaps the enumerator should have put Watson? > > Because, Mary Ann gave the birthplace of Newcastle and William Hylton was originally from Cumberland, I am wondering if she is the daughter of an earlier marriage? > > Joy >