RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 3/3
    1. [Ortenau] definition of relationship
    2. Ruth Hundley
    3. Hello, I am looking for a relationship noted in the mar. banns for my great grandparents: double blood relationship in the thrird degree What does this mean other than they were 3rd cousins??? I think or double cousis. They were both from the town of Waldulm, Baden, Germany and it was a very small village to which I think everyone married into the same family many times and I am altumultly related to everyone!!! Any help would be greatly appreciated in definitions. Thanks, Ruth in IL, USA

    12/16/2008 10:06:04
    1. Re: [Ortenau] definition of relationship
    2. djweber
    3. Ruth, This may be the specific Priest and his method of indicating that a dispensation was required for the marriage. Until 1917 the Catholic Church required dispensation if the parties of the marriage were "related to the fourth degree of consanquinity". In 1917, this dropped to the third degree and in 1983 to the second degree, first cousins. Considering the geographic location, or perhaps the identification should be, geographic isolation of many of the towns of the Black Forest and Baden area, logically dispensations may have been a common action. I have a friend who for years has teased his wife who was born in a town in West Virginia that the town's fifty-page telephone book included only three family names. Certainly this is an exaggeration of truth but eventually in the downward generations of a family, cousins, of various degree, may marry. The more isolated the town may be by hills, forest and rivers, such marriages may be increased in percentage of the total marriages. Procedures may vary but normally the dispensation would be filed separately from the marriage Rite listing. In some instances the need for a dispensation was identified within that Rite listing by the specific Priest. Perhaps your Priest of Waldulm made such an identification with the marginal entry. Perhaps during the tenure of that particular Priest, it was a common entry at Waldum. Earlier this year Dick Eastman in an article on second cousins tried his hand at combining details into a relationship chart. The URL sould be < http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_genealogy/2008/02/what-is-second.html > and while it would not be specific to your instance, it might be helpful. There are a number of other relationship charts online but I might believe that the entry you found was merely for the indication of the needed dispensation. djweber djwdjw@ix.netcom.com ---------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ruth Hundley" <nrhundley@sbcglobal.net> To: <deu-bad-ortenau@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 5:06 PM Subject: [Ortenau] definition of relationship > Hello, > I am looking for a relationship noted in the mar. banns for my great > grandparents: > > double blood relationship in the thrird degree > > What does this mean other than they were 3rd cousins??? I think or double > cousis. > > They were both from the town of Waldulm, Baden, Germany and it was a very > small village to which I think everyone married into the same family many > times and I am altumultly related to everyone!!! > > Any help would be greatly appreciated in definitions. > > Thanks, > > Ruth in IL, USA >

    12/17/2008 12:45:48
    1. Re: [Ortenau] definition of relationship
    2. Wendelin Irslinger
    3. Hello Ruth, I assume it means they had same 2 ancestors, maybe the same great grandparents which means the equal third degree. If the same ancestor were for one the great grandparent and for the other one the grandparent it's the unequal third degree. Or perhaps even 4 ancestors? - Wendelin On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:06:04 -0600 "Ruth Hundley" <nrhundley@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Hello, > I am looking for a relationship noted in the mar. banns for my great > grandparents: > > double blood relationship in the thrird degree > > What does this mean other than they were 3rd cousins??? I think or > double cousis. > > They were both from the town of Waldulm, Baden, Germany and it was a > very small village to which I think everyone married into the same > family many times and I am altumultly related to everyone!!! > > Any help would be greatly appreciated in definitions. > > Thanks, > > Ruth in IL, USA

    12/17/2008 01:53:54