Hi Bob, I have the following burial besides Henry & William - Ann daughter of Henry Granger deceased & Mary his then wife, 30 June 1768. Mary Granger married on the 30th April 1758 to Augustine (Austin) Sheavyn, both of Ticknall, at Ticknall, by banns. I didn't realise it until I looked but there was an earlier Granger marriage - Elizabeth Granger married John Purslom, both of Ticknall, 18 April 1731 at Calke, by banns. Austin Shevin was buried 17 Dec 1780 at Ticknall, he was evidently a widower when he married Mary Granger as there was a Mary wife of Augustin Shevin buried 13 Feb 1757 at Ticknall. Mary herself seems to have been buried 19 Oct 1806 as a widow. Augustine & his first wife had Mary bap 16 Mar 1732/3, Ann bap 1 Mar 1737/8, Rachel bap 7 Dec 1740 and Catherine bap 13 June 1744. Augustine and Mary (Granger) had Hannah bap 22 Aug 1758, buried 16 Dec 1759 and Sarah bap 18 Nov 1760. Hope that helps a little. Just remembered, there is no gravestone to any of these in Ticknall churchyard, not a surviving one anyway. Cheers, Sue   > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 18:13:15 -0000 > From: "Bob Butler" <bob.butler@sky.com> > Subject: Re: [DBY] DERBYSGEN Digest, Henry GRANGER Ticknall > To: "'Sue Brown'" <suegorickbrown@yahoo.co.uk>, >     <derbysgen@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <000d01cdd56f$b240f4e0$16c2dea0$@sky.com> > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="iso-8859-1" > > Thanks Sue, > > I have done a search in the Notts FHS database and there is no Henry in the > likely period that I would imagine he would have been born.  There are a few > Grangers but not in the Sutton area. > > There is a family story that the Grangers were originally Huguenots from > France but there is no evidence to support this. > > I know that William Granger (Henry's son) was buried at Ticknall on 31st Jan > 1755 - just a few months before Henry - but not of any others. > I haven't been able to find anything about Henry's wife Mary after his > death > - she would have been quite young then so probably remarried - especially as > she had children aged 10, 4 and 1 to care for. > Any information about the Grangers in Ticknall  that you can provide would > be appreciated. > I did have a look around the church graveyard but could not find any > headstones. > > Thanks again for your kind interest. > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: derbysgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:derbysgen-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of Sue Brown > Sent: 08 December 2012 16:23 > To: derbysgen@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [DBY] DERBYSGEN Digest, Henry GRANGER Ticknall > > > >> Hi Bob, > There's nothing in the Ticknall settlement certificates, removal orders and > settlement examinations for him either. Might he have come from the Sutton > in Ashfield area if he married there, perhaps he was working in Ticknall and > married a girl back near where he came from. His is the only Granger family > in Ticknall. > Do you have the details of the two children buried at Ticknall as well? If > not I can supply. > Sue > >> Message: 1 >> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 20:34:04 -0000 >> From: "Bob Butler" <bob.butler@sky.com> >> Subject: [DBY] Henry GRANGER Ticknall >> To: <derbysgen@rootsweb.com> >> Message-ID: <00bd01cdd4ba$3379d380$9a6d7a80$@sky.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain;??? charset="us-ascii" >> >> Following Nirvard's recent posting about his Ticknall family I have >> been prompted to enquire if anyone can help with my wife's 5 x gt >> grandfather Henry GRANGER. >> >> >> >> I have his burial in Ticknall on 8th June 1755 - his marriage to Mary >> Slaney in Sutton in Ashfield, Notts gives his parish as Ticknall (4th >> Oct 1742) - the baptism of 4 children in Ticknall - John 1745, William >> 1747 (burial Ticknall 1755), Ann 1751, Francis 1754 >> >> >> >> I cannot find his baptism in or near Ticknall - can anyone help please? >> >> >> >> Many thanks in advance >> >> >> >> Bob >> >> >> >>   > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DERBYSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > >